Welcome To TruthVids.net What happened to the Twelve Lost Tribes of Israel? Did they just disappear from history? This is perhaps the biggest mystery in the Bible and it has never been satisfactorily answered by mainstream Christianity or academia. But there is an answer, although it is an answer that some people would rather keep hidden. This website sets out to give that answer in clear, plain language with supporting documentation. The truth is that the ancient Israelites migrated to Europe under different names over a period of time. Whether they were called Scythians, Cimerians, Sakea, Gaulic, Celtic, or Germanic Tribes, they were all the descendants of the ancient Israelites. These tribes eventually destroyed the Roman Empire and became Saxons, Angles, Jutes, Danes, Franks, Frisians, Goths, and many other related tribes and peoples. The point is that these peoples are the people of the Old Testament and of the New
Comments (51)
sorted by:
Exactly.
Now you know why the wicked are so obsessed with destroying western civilization.
I feel a couple of them may be here to help maintain the status quo. To help keep eyes from looking too deeply.
This is an open forum. Remember, these people have much vested in their status quo.
Careful who you follow.
WELL, that certainly explains the targeting of Europe we see today. I watched several compilations of NYE in Europe and the ONLY Europeans were the ones filming!
Yes. It's easy to see the play, once you know the plan.
They're northwest europe
Many are.
I don’t think anyone knows.
I have seen deep conversations that they were not Europeans.
I have no idea
That's why they present you "proof".
This is why the false jews want the real one's destroyed so badly.
Dig, read, and learn.
The tribes were originally from hotter climates right?
Possibly, but climate always changes.
I think their history goes back far before the old testament. I think it goes back to the Richat Structure, or "Eye of the Sahara," in Mauritania, Northwest Africa, proving Plato's Atlantis with its distinct history. Notice the nearby Atlas Mountains. The first ruler of Atlantis was Atlas.
They would have to be darker skinned due to how close to the equator they are.
Skin tone is a clue of someone’s distance towards the equator.
There was no sun screen back then. White skin would burn in those areas.
Climate's change, they were not always what they are now.
Wrong, you will notice that many Egyptian hieroglyphs show the people as being red, because they wore red ochre as sun screen.
I provided you proof here:
https://youtu.be/PnP7yPfJZSk?si=ATRCTtJFTZTM_86c
I just don’t buy it.
They weren’t white. Whites are from colder climates:
It’s why culturally whites are better inventors and system designers.
Whites had to survive the winter which forced them to think long term like storage and supply chains.
No amount of proof will ever satisfy you. Even if God came down on earth and told you, you would still deny him.
Everyone just moved around so they all became intermingled, but the earliest verses of the Torah (song of Deborah) only describe 10 tribes and not 12, and the two were added later to accomodate Judea and Israel.
One leading theory suggests, the Tribe of Dan was probably Aegean, based on archeology and were called out for not assisting in a war for being too close to their ships and were located just above the Phillistines. And could be related to the Denezen in the bronze age collapse. Jacob tells the brothers, "Dan will provide justice for his peopleas one of the tribes of Israel." Why would he need to spell this out unless they were foreign? Also Samson comes from Dan, and the story reads out like a typical Greek tragedy.
The rest were most likely Canaanite with the exception of the Levites, who were possibly the only tribe to come from Egypt. They were not assigned land but were assigned the priestly class and the only ones with Egyptian names.
Isa.11:11 It shall come to pass in that day That the Lord shall set His hand again the second time To recover the remnant of His people who are left, From Assyria and Egypt, From Pathros and Cush, From Elam and Shinar, From Hamath and the [d]islands of the sea.
12 He will set up a banner for the nations, And will assemble the outcasts of Israel, And gather together the dispersed of Judah From the four corners of the earth.
Spoiler Alert: The Phrygians became the Khazarians.
https://rumble.com/v5c27lm-dr.-lee-merritt-all-roads-lead-to-phrygia.html
Great video. 👍
Did you perhaps mean the TEN “lost” tribes of Israel? The tribes of Benjamin and Judah, along with the Levites were never lost - they went into captivity into Babylon -read Daniel- and returned to Jerusalem after 70 years in captivity.
Some say 10, some say 12, some say 13. Let's just say the true lost tribes of Israel.
You can do that if you wish. I was simply going by what the Bible says. The kingdom of Judah, which included the tribe of Benjamin as well as the priestly Levites, were taken into captivity by the Babylonians, and then allowed to return after 70 years by King Cyrus (Persia). Read the books of Daniel, Ezra, and Nehemiah to see what they went through both during and after the 70 years. Also, just going to add, the main reason for the split between the northern and southern kingdoms was because the northern kingdom openly returned to idol worship, while the southern kingdom, at least superficially, worshipped God in the temple. People in the northern kingdom who did not agree with idol worship migrated to the southern kingdom, the ten tribes were never lost, at least not the true believers in God. It’s kind of like today, we see pissed off patriots leaving blue states because they don’t like their rights being trampled on and are moving to red states. Same thing.
But it doesn't say what ultimately happened to them after they returned. It says nothing about where they are now and what became of them.
Yeah, it does. You can read the rest of the OT to find out for yourself.
It does not say what ultimately happened to all of the tribes. I present you proof of what happened. Take the time to read it before trying to debunk it.
I’ve read about the Diaspora. Tell me about the decree of Caesar that caused Jesus to be born in Bethlehem. Did it only apply to the tribe of Judah? Take the time to seriously read the Bible before trying to debunk it.
How am I trying to debunk the bible?
And some say thirteen with Joseph's son Ephraim and Manasseh receiving the blessing of Abraham from Jacob.
Yes, I've heard ten, twelve, and thirteen.
Revelation 2:9 NIV [9] I know your afflictions and your poverty—yet you are rich! I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
https://bible.com/bible/111/rev.2.9.NIV
Revelation 3:9 NIV [9] I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars—I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.
https://bible.com/bible/111/rev.3.9.NIV
There is a reason Jesus warned us.
If you understand Satan, reality, and especially God....the war we are in is unchanging. God doesn't change, Satan's schemes are the same, the LORD is in charge of it all.
Time is an illusion to us. Theory of relativity proves that time can be bent by velocity.
All that to say, the book of Revelation is special. Those 7 letters to His beloved Church are vastly important. They exist outside of time.
There is a reason Jesus warned us about the opposition. He promised us that we would not be left unaware of Satan's schemes. Especially at the end of the age of grace, when the world would be at a fever pitch of evil under Satan's lame duck regime.
This is who Satan is, this is what he is allowed to do. We are admonished regularly by the Lord to not be deceived.
If we focus on Jesus, the reality of everything comes into perfect clarity. Reality comes into perfect focus.
He showed us the way. And sealed it with the promise of His Holy Spirit doing greater things than He did.
www.holyspiritproductions.com
#ComingSoon #Jesus #HolySpiritProductions #Revival #TheCalledOutOnes
An interesting, little-known historical account by Eusebius about Pilate's report to Tiberius Caesar concerning Jesus' resurrection and deity Eusebius records in book two of his Ecclesiastical History that after Jesus' death and resurrection, reports of his resurrection spread all throughout Judea, and Pilate reported this to Tiberius Caesar. Tiberius referred the matter to the Roman Senate to vote whether or not Jesus should be considered a God, but the matter was rejected. Eusebius received this information from an earlier church father, Tertullian.
A clear and detailed description of Jesus is in this letter.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/106qgcf/an_interesting_littleknown_historical_account_by/
Here is a free book on the subject with over a hundred confirmed proofs.
https://media.christogenea.org/system/files/sharedfiles/843/PDFs/100%20Proofs%20Book%201-10.pdf
Supporting information on the subject:
https://seed167.bitchute.com/Ir8GPaGbhUj7/VxT2hw8KmhCe.mp4
https://seed122.bitchute.com/guPLgD6hFJJv/PhfZc4YvJZaX.mp4
https://www.bitchute.com/video/duY2oh8PCAWx
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VxT2hw8KmhCe/
Old 1902 article about this subject.
https://seed163.bitchute.com/AMhoJpc4Zf2T/bbDNgt12zbsM.mp4
When you read the nature of the captivity in Babylon, only the most important ones were taken: blacksmiths, artisans, lawmakers, that sort of thing: i.e. a rump was left behind. It only concerned a certain fraction, and if memory serves me well: Chronicles lists the character of the people taken.
Read Ezrah and Nehemiah ... what did they encounter? (yeah ... pulling a few beards and chasing away women and children from the Westbank. Pun!)
The image we have is that the WHOLE nation went into exile and lived in Babylon. Anyone with half a brain would note that this is not possible. Hyperbole, iconography.
Take then this framework and apply it to Assyrian depopulation agenda ... In effect, the image is that the WHOLE population was moved, leaving the northern areas void of people.
All of a sudden it not longer is the biggest mystery in the bible. Even saying that belies the fact that there are a couple of mysteries: one a holy mystery, which is that all knowledge is hidden in Jesus Christ. (Paul), and Revelation: Gods Finished Mystery.
But ok, let's put semantics aside. Take the model I just described, and then consider that certain members of those groups forced into exile may have found refuge with other tribes, being subsumed by them. That is something different and certainly something that might have happened. (See also New Zealand whites; Whites in South America; White in Japan). Anthropological data is not with this idea that these lost tribes made Frisians, Angles, Saxons, etc. There is however a relationship between: Futhark and Turkic writing styles. Between Phoenician Alphabet and Roman/Etruskuan. Language: Phoenician and Judaic. Welsh and Egyptian hieroglyphs (sign -.- => skr => sicher, zeker, meaning wall anker, securing, sure, fixed)
In other words, instead of a middle EAST centric world view, which is usually prevailing thanks to ideas as bible = absolute truth; instead of the " out of Africa model"; data rather gives us a Steppe baseline from which we can view the world. The Aryan language tree is what it is.
I am sure, that not one model is the ultimate truth, region across geological time is a relative word. People differ in essence. The advantage of say: Oera Linda bok telling the story of these differences or believing these differences came upon us because of just 1 man and 1 woman is quite visible, because these difference were creative acts by God, rather than the accidental sperm meet egg contraption. Why? Because our own experiences tells us, that besides DNA degeneration, two Han chinese doe not produce a blond blue eyes tall Saxon.
Come on guys ... logical thinking.
👏