I mean sure, there is a possibility that because Singham is in Shanghai and doing so could be seen as an act of war, but why can't it be done?
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Mossad traveld the world hunting and kidnapping NAZi's
for recruitment i assume
Yes we can and yes we will.............when the time is right. Everything has a moment in time when it needs to be done. Q's plan is no different. We cannot get the cart before the horse, yet a lot of MAGA folks want justice and retribution right here and right NOW. But that isn't how Q needs for this operation to move forward. He needs to get rid of judges who release illegals because of a minute problem or Congressmen and Senators who would hold back on President Trump's actions by saying he is not working with Congress or using nefarious means to get his vision executed.
Just be patient and let the Q plan come to you. Once Soros is in prison what will be your next pound of flesh? Hillary? Then Bill?......yada, yada, yada. Maybe instead of picking these chess pieces up one by one Q will grab them all in one operation, on a particular day when they are not expecting it and in a manner that will stun the world.
AND YOU HAVE JUST ELUCIDATE QUITE ELOQUENTLY what I have been thinking for awhile NOW!!!!!!....
These malcontents CANNOT KNOW WHEN THE HAMMER IS GOING TO FALL...it will be a surgical strike(s) at ONE TIME.
There can be NO ESCAPING the Special Ops People who will be doing this!!!!!! Along with the NECESSARY Law Enforcement!!!!
Plus, these will be military tribunals. Think about the mechanics of how many military judges need to be seated BEFORE the prosecutions begin. There will be so many people needing to be prosecuted that President Trump have to beef up the military judiciary. Have you heard anything about that? Probably not since I believe the trials will happen in Cuba, thus the blue and pink haired idiots cannot protest those courthouses.
The military needs to be brought up to speed on how to arrest certain people, when to arrest them, how to transport them to a holding facility not on CONUS, and how to try them in court. All that takes time to bring up to speed.
How will there be military tribunals when the people involved aren't military?
This is the issue I have with all the military tribunals talk. The military doesn't have jurisdiction over civilians.
What is the legal pathway of there being military tribunals that involve non-military civilians?
And I mean actual, real laws that are on record. Not just hand waving and lots of vague claims.
Seriously, I would really like to understand this, but I need actual, real facts that clearly show this. Not vague claims or trying to shoehorn in some unrelated law, which is what always happens when I ask for someone to explain this to me.
We are under a soft martial law. Law of war manual.
It's obvious Bakas is here to sow division here at GAW fren. He's just a shill shillin'.
I agree with your statement, it's exactly what is happening.
Who am I shilling for? And what exactly is your definition of "shilling"? Asking basic questions? Pointing out obvious facts?
Let's go over what I said in my last post to you, when you claimed I wasn't following Q.
I pointed out that Q has stressed that things must be done legally. That's why I'm asking for any information about how the military can legally put non-military civilians through military tribunals. Because from all the research I've done, legally speaking, they can't. But I acknowledge that I don't know everything and others here might have info I haven't come across, which is why I'm asking. It would stand to reason that people making these claims would have done their own research on it, seeing as how this is an elite research board and come across legal loopholes to allow it. Notice, though, that no one has actually named any laws that would allow the military to hold tribunals on citizens. So obviously others are having the same problem finding info on this as well.
My second point in our other conversation was that Q said to question everything. He didn't say "question everything except what random people say on GreatAwakening.win" or "Question everything except what makes people uncomfortable." So I question everything.
As to believing The Plan, I 100% believe that there is A Plan. What exactly that plan is, I don't know. Q never actually sat down and wrote out what The Plan was.
So we have people interpreting what they think The Plan is, based on Q's drops. And sometimes they're wrong. For instance, pre-January 2021, there was not a single person here saying that The Plan involved Biden being in the White House for 4 years, playing President. They were saying the exact opposite. If you want a timeline of every failed prediction that was at some time or other accepted as part of The Plan by large numbers of Anons, look at the top of the screen and you'll see the toggles where you can sort messages both by "hot, new, top, etc.." and by day, week, month, all time, etc. Take an hour or so and click "Top" and ""All time" and it will basically take you back to when this forum was at its peak, right after J6 and kind of go from there, because sadly, the activity on this forum has consistently fallen since then. And one reason for that is because people get tired of getting their emotions jerked around when they keep getting told all this stuff that's supposed to happen (because it's part of the plan) only to have the goal post moved back farther and farther.
So obviously sometimes people get things wrong. It happens. People aren't perfect. But pretending that there is some sort of official Plan, approved by Q, that everyone is on the same page with is just ludicrous.
It's usually the loudest or most Prolific people who set the idea of what The Plan is. Unfortunately, loudness =/= Truth.
Finally, why I do this is because we're supposed to be redpilling normies, and when they're presented with things that just don't make sense, legally (like the military putting civilians through military tribunals), they're obviously going to ask "How?". And the only responses that Anons have to that is either hand wavy vague nonsense like "Nuremberg 2.0!" or they angry because the normies aren't impressed with their "Trust me, bro!" type of answers.
I'm tired of waiting for The Storm, so if the reason why it hasn't come yet is because we haven't gotten the normies on board, then we need to change how people go about trying to redpill them. Vague nonsensical explanations and "Trust me, bro!" vibes have obviously failed, since we're almost 10 years into the plan.
So maybe trying to get people to (a) not make up random shit and then run around screaming that it's part of The Plan and anyone who questions it is a shill and (b) learn how to make convincing arguments that will actually get normies on board is a better course of action than what people are doing now.
Because it's absolutely embarrassing to see Anons on X or Facebook or some other site arguing with normies and making fools of themselves and us because everyone judges every Anon, because of the asinine shit people are saying out there.
So I'm actively on here trying to get people to use logic and reason and facts when discussing the plan because guess what normies respond best to? Logic, reason, and facts. So if I'm here shilling, I must really suck at it, when I'm trying to actively get other people here to make better arguments so they will actually succeed at redpilling normies and to not believe anything they hear just because they want it to be true.
Maybe that's the issue. I'm on here, treating this place as the elite research board it claims to be, following things that Q literally instructed us to do, and that just pops people's hopium and copium ballons.
So I suppose you're upset because I'm asking you to actually think about stuff rather than just believe something because you want it to be true rather than believe it because you have solid evidence that it's true.
So, if all that makes me a shill, guilty as charged. 🤷♀️
K.
🙄
There is no such thing as a "soft martial law", legally speaking.
Even so, being under martial law (actually and legally) does not give the military the power to hold military tribunals for civilians.
Nuremberg 2.0 imo. The press weren’t military either.
Nuremberg was an international war-crimes tribunal after a world war and an occupation.
That’s not the same as the military arresting and putting civilians on trial at home.
If “Nuremberg 2.0” is the whole argument, you’re just proving my point..🤷♀️
Imo means in my opinion, don’t like mine? Get your own. Real simple.
This isn't about opinions, though. It's about actual facts, which I pointed out above.
I specifically said that in my previous post. That I'm looking for facts, not just vague ideas (ie, opinions).
So I don't understand why you felt the need to jump into the conversation just to give me a response I set out to avoid.
Insurrection and TREASON are both contrary the Contitution of the Republic correct? I'm definitely not an attorney or expert about this, but, if the Insurrection Act is invoked doesn't thar give the military overall jurisdiction? I can't present facts myself, but that is my pea brain way of understanding
No. Even if the Insurrection Act was invoked, it does not give the military the right to hold tribunals for civilians.
Ok, I don't know personally. Did anyone give you a legal response?
No.
Everything you said is correct. The plan is not on our personal timetable. People need to get that through there heads. Everything happens at the right time not our time. Your frustration and feelings are not taken into concideration.
i wonder if ppl miss the fact that Trump n teams r working to destroy the WHOLE corrupt cabal? i focus more on the SYSTEMS being destroyed permanently, than any specific individuals. that'll come.
Is there an indictment and warrant? By the law or we lose.
exactly!
Jews will not 'arrest or otherwise' another Jew or shabos goy while they are still useful.
Every person doing this work is been identified. If soros stops then all this happens in a vacuum. It needs to continue just as it is until it doesnt. For the protesters its a trap that will eventually be sprung. DOJ is goIng to post their faces and names. SOROS for all we know could be dead.
Good question. 🤔
Or reverse Maduro all the liberals
Dead man switches, threats on civilians, certain truce? Many possibilities
Who says it hasn’t already been done?
What’s to say they haven’t been?
Let's do it!