Maybe he speaks the truth, but he doesn't speak the whole truth.
For instance, to say "we won [WWII]" is pretty much completely false in context. The people who ran WWII were (mostly) the American, British, Russian, Italian and German Oligarchs (many of them Jewish or crypto Jews on both sides). The people we think of as "the leadership" had almost nothing to do with the actual operations that mattered. They were front men only. The real leadership bought, paid for, manufactured and directed the whole thing, starting decades before the "war". The whole thing, starting in the late 19th century (or maybe even earlier), was conceived of and controlled by the families Rothschild and Rockefeller (and their ilk) and they controlled every level on both sides the entire time.
The Nazis (the actual people we call the "Nazis") worked for these Oligarchs on the "Axis" side and after WWII they STILL worked for the exact same Oligarchs, spread out in leadership positions in every area of government and industry of all the Countries mentioned. The "Nazis" (the people) are us. We are the Nazis (in our systems and in our leadership). So are the Russians, and the British, and the Saudis.
Trump is not saying the truth here at all. He is catering to the WWII Play, calling fantasy "reality." WWII was pure theatre, all contrived the entire time. We can't "win a war" that is a play. All we can do is leave the theatre when the curtain closes, all so we can go back to the theatre the next time it opens to watch the next play made by the same Production Company and Board of Directors.
No. Jews did not start the Holocaust. Churchill, De Gaulle, Hirohito, Hitler, Mussolini, Roosevelt, and Stalin were not Jews. This is just anti-Semitic bullshit.
Yes they did. One of the main reasons to start the World Wars was to justify the existence of Israel. The Balfour Declaration after WW1 and the establishment of Israel after WW2.
Neither of those people you mentioned started the Holohoax cause it didn’t happen as told. Neither Churchill, De Gaulle, or Eisenhower mentioned the Holohoax in their memoirs.
An alleged 11 million people died in the Holohoax. So do you think Nazi Germany actually killed 5,022.83 people per day around the clock for 6 years straight while fighting a 2 Front war with limited resources? You couldn’t burn that many bodies so there would have to be mass graves right? So where are they?
Where did the origin of the Holohoax come from? The Soviet Union and who were the Bolsheviks? Majority Jewish. Who was the father of communism? Karl Marx also Jewish.
Why isn’t the slaughter of millions of Orthodox Christians in the Jewish Bolshevik Soviet Union rarely talked about? Maybe because 1 the New York Times in 1932 published an article defending the Soviet Policies. And who was the editor of the New York Times. Adolph S Ochs who was Jewish. And 2. Robert Maxwell Ghislaine’s father had a direct hand in publishing American textbooks for years.
You couldn’t even answer my question on a different thread. Who would you rather have as neighbors Somalians or Japanese? You ignored the question cause you know I was right. Nobody in their right mind would chose Somalians over Japanese.
And I and every white conservative under the age of 35 do not fucking care about being called anti semetic or racist. The age of white guilt is over.
Who are "the Jews?" Are the Rothschilds Jews? Are the hundreds and probably thousands of other Jewish Oligarchs and Banksters that created WWI, WWII, the League of Nations, the CFR, ALL of the media agencies, (all controlled by the same information system through "treaties" and their various predominantly Jewish board of directors), the Treaty of Versailles, the Bank of International Settlements, the Fed, etc., etc. the Jews? Almost all of them are provably Jewish, and many can be found to be crypto Jews with a little digging. Are they also "the Jews?"
It is provable that Hitler was a mischling (quarter Jew). Not only was he a partial Jew, there is substantial evidence that he was a Rothschild grandson. There were estimated 150,000 Jews in the Hitler army. Like half of the top brigade were Jews (or mischlings). The entire purpose of the Nazis was to push the Jews into Jerusalem to create the state of Israel, which is exactly what happened through agreements between the Nazis and the Jews. Most of the German Jews (about 500,000) either went to Palestine, the Americas, or joined the army. Many of the hundred thousand or so German Jews left in Germany when war broke out were released after the war.
As for the Holocaust, I challenge you to prove it existed. Consider, there were no bodies, there was no weapon, there was a single eye witness who died a few days afterwards (maybe). There were ZERO BODIES, there was NO MURDER WEAPON, and there was ONE WITNESS WHO WAS IMMEDIATELY "KILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER."
The problem of course of any such discussion is that it commits a categorical error from the first word; "the Jews," as if all people in a group are complicit in the coordinated actions of some of the group. We automatically assume (by design) that just because many Jews weren't complicit (which is provably true), that means "it wasn't the Jews" through their leadership. It is easily shown that most of the Jews disagreed with the designs of the leadership. THAT WAS WHY IT HAD TO BE DONE THAT WAY. Because most of the Jews didn't want to go to Palestine. They liked their home. They had a couple thousand years worth of ties to their homes. The design of the Nazis was to force the masses of the Jews out of their home into Palestine.
Certainly most of the Jews were not complicit. But the higher they are in the economic and political hierarchy, the more likely they are complicit (though it's not a certainty in any individual case). I assert that pretty much everyone at the top of the "World Wars Movie" (that has lasted from about 1890 to today) were controlled by that Elite group of "the Jews," and everyone who wasn't is a provable agent of the top level Jews (even if they didn't necessarily know it).
There is so much to unpack on all of the claims I have made. I can happily give specifics of anything you want. What's important to appreciate is that there was ONLY ONE SIDE on the war. Every "other side" was theatre (very deadly theatre), designed to make the masses believe the movie.
Brave — "Khazaria was a powerful, semi-nomadic Turkic empire that flourished between the 7th and 10th centuries CE, spanning modern-day southeastern Russia, southern Ukraine, and western Kazakhstan. It emerged from the fragmentation of the Western Turkic Khaganate and became a major commercial hub along the Silk Road, controlling key trade routes between Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Central Asia.
The Khazars, the people of Khazaria, originally practiced Tengrism, a shamanic and polytheistic religion common among Turkic peoples. However, the ruling elite converted to Rabbinic Judaism in the 8th or 9th century, likely as a strategic move to maintain neutrality between the Christian Byzantine Empire and the Muslim Abbasid Caliphate. This conversion made Khazaria one of the few Jewish states in history, with synagogues, Hebrew script, and Jewish religious institutions established under rulers such as King Bulan and King Obadiah.
Despite the conversion of the royal family and nobility, the extent of Jewish adoption among the general population remains debated. The state was religiously tolerant, allowing Christians, Muslims, pagans, and Jews to coexist. Khazaria's influence declined after the Kievan Rus’, led by Prince Sviatoslav I, captured and destroyed its capital, Atil, in 969 CE, leading to the empire’s disintegration by the mid-11th century.
The Khazar myth, a discredited theory popularized in the 19th century, claims that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from Khazar converts. This idea has been widely rejected by historians and geneticists, who find that Ashkenazi Jews have primarily Near Eastern and European ancestry, not Turkic. Nevertheless, the Khazar hypothesis has been exploited in antisemitic conspiracy theories to deny Jewish historical ties to the Land of Israel and to delegitimize the modern State of Israel.
Today, the legacy of Khazaria endures in cultural memory, place names (such as the Caspian Sea being called the "Khazar Sea" in some Turkic languages), and ongoing scholarly research into its complex history."
I explicitly said it was some of the Jews and it wasn't all of the Jews (a very small group in the scope of things). By your response, it is almost certain you didn't read a single thing I wrote. Yet without hearing what I was saying, you claim I am an "anti-Semite" and am "gross."
Until you learn how to listen to what a person says, there is no reason to bother responding. Your response is literally worse than meaningless because it is automatically incorrect (since you don't even know what I said).
I suggest you look into the actual origins of the word "anti-Semite." Then investigate who created the ADL, and what they use the phrase "anti-Semite" for.
My president speaks truth
Maybe he speaks the truth, but he doesn't speak the whole truth.
For instance, to say "we won [WWII]" is pretty much completely false in context. The people who ran WWII were (mostly) the American, British, Russian, Italian and German Oligarchs (many of them Jewish or crypto Jews on both sides). The people we think of as "the leadership" had almost nothing to do with the actual operations that mattered. They were front men only. The real leadership bought, paid for, manufactured and directed the whole thing, starting decades before the "war". The whole thing, starting in the late 19th century (or maybe even earlier), was conceived of and controlled by the families Rothschild and Rockefeller (and their ilk) and they controlled every level on both sides the entire time.
The Nazis (the actual people we call the "Nazis") worked for these Oligarchs on the "Axis" side and after WWII they STILL worked for the exact same Oligarchs, spread out in leadership positions in every area of government and industry of all the Countries mentioned. The "Nazis" (the people) are us. We are the Nazis (in our systems and in our leadership). So are the Russians, and the British, and the Saudis.
Trump is not saying the truth here at all. He is catering to the WWII Play, calling fantasy "reality." WWII was pure theatre, all contrived the entire time. We can't "win a war" that is a play. All we can do is leave the theatre when the curtain closes, all so we can go back to the theatre the next time it opens to watch the next play made by the same Production Company and Board of Directors.
No. Jews did not start the Holocaust. Churchill, De Gaulle, Hirohito, Hitler, Mussolini, Roosevelt, and Stalin were not Jews. This is just anti-Semitic bullshit.
Yes they did. One of the main reasons to start the World Wars was to justify the existence of Israel. The Balfour Declaration after WW1 and the establishment of Israel after WW2.
Neither of those people you mentioned started the Holohoax cause it didn’t happen as told. Neither Churchill, De Gaulle, or Eisenhower mentioned the Holohoax in their memoirs.
An alleged 11 million people died in the Holohoax. So do you think Nazi Germany actually killed 5,022.83 people per day around the clock for 6 years straight while fighting a 2 Front war with limited resources? You couldn’t burn that many bodies so there would have to be mass graves right? So where are they?
Where did the origin of the Holohoax come from? The Soviet Union and who were the Bolsheviks? Majority Jewish. Who was the father of communism? Karl Marx also Jewish.
Why isn’t the slaughter of millions of Orthodox Christians in the Jewish Bolshevik Soviet Union rarely talked about? Maybe because 1 the New York Times in 1932 published an article defending the Soviet Policies. And who was the editor of the New York Times. Adolph S Ochs who was Jewish. And 2. Robert Maxwell Ghislaine’s father had a direct hand in publishing American textbooks for years.
Nobody cares about crying about anti Semitism.
Fuck you, you anti-Semitic piece of shit.
You couldn’t even answer my question on a different thread. Who would you rather have as neighbors Somalians or Japanese? You ignored the question cause you know I was right. Nobody in their right mind would chose Somalians over Japanese.
And I and every white conservative under the age of 35 do not fucking care about being called anti semetic or racist. The age of white guilt is over.
Who are "the Jews?" Are the Rothschilds Jews? Are the hundreds and probably thousands of other Jewish Oligarchs and Banksters that created WWI, WWII, the League of Nations, the CFR, ALL of the media agencies, (all controlled by the same information system through "treaties" and their various predominantly Jewish board of directors), the Treaty of Versailles, the Bank of International Settlements, the Fed, etc., etc. the Jews? Almost all of them are provably Jewish, and many can be found to be crypto Jews with a little digging. Are they also "the Jews?"
It is provable that Hitler was a mischling (quarter Jew). Not only was he a partial Jew, there is substantial evidence that he was a Rothschild grandson. There were estimated 150,000 Jews in the Hitler army. Like half of the top brigade were Jews (or mischlings). The entire purpose of the Nazis was to push the Jews into Jerusalem to create the state of Israel, which is exactly what happened through agreements between the Nazis and the Jews. Most of the German Jews (about 500,000) either went to Palestine, the Americas, or joined the army. Many of the hundred thousand or so German Jews left in Germany when war broke out were released after the war.
As for the Holocaust, I challenge you to prove it existed. Consider, there were no bodies, there was no weapon, there was a single eye witness who died a few days afterwards (maybe). There were ZERO BODIES, there was NO MURDER WEAPON, and there was ONE WITNESS WHO WAS IMMEDIATELY "KILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER."
The problem of course of any such discussion is that it commits a categorical error from the first word; "the Jews," as if all people in a group are complicit in the coordinated actions of some of the group. We automatically assume (by design) that just because many Jews weren't complicit (which is provably true), that means "it wasn't the Jews" through their leadership. It is easily shown that most of the Jews disagreed with the designs of the leadership. THAT WAS WHY IT HAD TO BE DONE THAT WAY. Because most of the Jews didn't want to go to Palestine. They liked their home. They had a couple thousand years worth of ties to their homes. The design of the Nazis was to force the masses of the Jews out of their home into Palestine.
Certainly most of the Jews were not complicit. But the higher they are in the economic and political hierarchy, the more likely they are complicit (though it's not a certainty in any individual case). I assert that pretty much everyone at the top of the "World Wars Movie" (that has lasted from about 1890 to today) were controlled by that Elite group of "the Jews," and everyone who wasn't is a provable agent of the top level Jews (even if they didn't necessarily know it).
There is so much to unpack on all of the claims I have made. I can happily give specifics of anything you want. What's important to appreciate is that there was ONLY ONE SIDE on the war. Every "other side" was theatre (very deadly theatre), designed to make the masses believe the movie.
Brave — "Khazaria was a powerful, semi-nomadic Turkic empire that flourished between the 7th and 10th centuries CE, spanning modern-day southeastern Russia, southern Ukraine, and western Kazakhstan. It emerged from the fragmentation of the Western Turkic Khaganate and became a major commercial hub along the Silk Road, controlling key trade routes between Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Central Asia.
The Khazars, the people of Khazaria, originally practiced Tengrism, a shamanic and polytheistic religion common among Turkic peoples. However, the ruling elite converted to Rabbinic Judaism in the 8th or 9th century, likely as a strategic move to maintain neutrality between the Christian Byzantine Empire and the Muslim Abbasid Caliphate. This conversion made Khazaria one of the few Jewish states in history, with synagogues, Hebrew script, and Jewish religious institutions established under rulers such as King Bulan and King Obadiah.
Despite the conversion of the royal family and nobility, the extent of Jewish adoption among the general population remains debated. The state was religiously tolerant, allowing Christians, Muslims, pagans, and Jews to coexist. Khazaria's influence declined after the Kievan Rus’, led by Prince Sviatoslav I, captured and destroyed its capital, Atil, in 969 CE, leading to the empire’s disintegration by the mid-11th century.
The Khazar myth, a discredited theory popularized in the 19th century, claims that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from Khazar converts. This idea has been widely rejected by historians and geneticists, who find that Ashkenazi Jews have primarily Near Eastern and European ancestry, not Turkic. Nevertheless, the Khazar hypothesis has been exploited in antisemitic conspiracy theories to deny Jewish historical ties to the Land of Israel and to delegitimize the modern State of Israel.
Today, the legacy of Khazaria endures in cultural memory, place names (such as the Caspian Sea being called the "Khazar Sea" in some Turkic languages), and ongoing scholarly research into its complex history."
I explicitly said it was some of the Jews and it wasn't all of the Jews (a very small group in the scope of things). By your response, it is almost certain you didn't read a single thing I wrote. Yet without hearing what I was saying, you claim I am an "anti-Semite" and am "gross."
Until you learn how to listen to what a person says, there is no reason to bother responding. Your response is literally worse than meaningless because it is automatically incorrect (since you don't even know what I said).
I suggest you look into the actual origins of the word "anti-Semite." Then investigate who created the ADL, and what they use the phrase "anti-Semite" for.
There was no Holocaust. And the Jews are not Semites. They're Edomites.
Sure, but can you whittle that down into 3 sentences for a zinger at Davos?
No.
The point is utilizing the "accepted" narrative is the only way to prove the point.
You can lean back, throw your feet on the desk and pontificate the fringe theory (whether it's true or not) but you won't make any headway
Watch it if you haven't....and count your blessings Gunga din
u/#catdance