Nope I disagree. it was needed to prevent the board from going to far extreme. Clouding the other info that needed to come out. Time and place for everything..it's similar to the Jew talks. Gotta make sure we don't lose sight of what we are doing here. It all served a purpose. Mods do an amazing job, a tough job but they have remained mission focused this whole time. Guardians over this place.
It also allowed the admin and leaders here to really test the anons and see who is who, how they react to conflict and leadership, team player or solo. Lots of good info was gathered
The idea that we should discourage (or more importantly, censor) any topic in the framework of the Great Awakening is exactly how the Cabal works, not legitimate investigators.
it's similar to the Jew talks
It's not about the topic, it's how it's presented. (This is the case for all relevant topics, not just the Jews.) If you show the evidence in a non-aggressive or not "This is the truth" way, that is exactly how people learn the truth. I assert that is WHY people are awakening to the truth (on all topics). The reason we are able to even begin to talk about "the Jew" debate is because WE have given evidence that people are willing to see. That evidence leads to other evidence, and the discussion begins to create an Awakening. You are giving way too much credit to Q (and the Censors) and way too little for investigative anons.
In general, your assessment of the situation and applauding the censorship of legitimate evidence is... I'll call it, "missing the entire point."
I simply am sharing what the Lord has revealed to me about this place and the leaders. You are free to see it how you want. I might have a unique understanding that few do. The story will continue to unfold :)
I appreciate that information is coming in (by the Q team) in it's proper time and place. That's what Q meant (in part) when they said, "Enjoy the Show."
But we are not Q. The censors here are not Q. And Q never discouraged any topic, and they certainly never censored any investigation. On the contrary, that is the opposite of their entire purpose.
The censorship here (that is topical) is pure evil. I'm not saying that any censor here is intentionally evil, but their actions of censorship are evil (and against Q). And, in some cases, I'm fairly certain some of our mods are controlled opposition. I'm not naming names, and my thoughts on this probably aren't what people would think, but that is a topic I won't elaborate, and I can't be certain regardless.
There is a difference between guiding the narrative and censoring the truth.
One is the guiding hand of the Director. The other is the most important tool of the Cabal (see 1A).
You are correct. When we moved over from Reddit and voat there was direct understanding of forum sliding measures and sensitivity to having the website banned and blacklisted. People forget the political and economic climate after the election was stolen. Anons were down and shills were spamming the boards to demoralize and also posting legit crazy things to paint us all with a broad stroke.
This is pretty well the same impression I got, and I don’t like being told to be quiet, but as explained it was never “this will not be discussed” but more “it’s not the right time to discuss this”, which comes off differently.
“I have this raging case of diarrhea, here are the symptoms, here’s some episodes I’ve had, heres what it got onto and how I cleaned it up, and here’s the rotten stuff that might have caused it.”
Do you discuss this
at your gastroenterologist office
mid-bite at Christmas dinner with your 7 year old niece and aunt
This is a false analogy. You are suggesting the removal of posts that are "off topic." But if the diarrhea was topical it would be a completely different situation. Like, what if that was a symptom of Covid v. 3.0 (Sars was v. 1.0) and not discussing it was essential to the exposure of the evil? Then censoring the important information about diarrhea would be evil and possibly deadly (murderous) on a massive scale.
In this case, we are talking about DEWs. They are topical to Q (clearly). But DEWs have been censored repeatedly with legitimate research and evidence.
I keep trying to help people understand that CENSORSHIP is not the same thing as "disagreeing with," or "thinking we should be focused on something else right now," etc. CENSORSHIP (in this case) IS ELIMINATING TOPICAL INFORMATION FROM INVESTIGATING RESEARCHERS.
I keep saying this, and the proponents of censorship keep ignoring it (this is not the first time this has come up, including with mods). I'm talking about TOPICAL, LEGITIMATE information and discussions, not "stuff that doesn't belong here." Unfortunately, if there is a whimsical power to determine "what is appropriate" it can be abused (we see that regarding censorship all the time in the news; see "hate speech"). That abuse has happened many, many times here.
The problem though was that C5 pretended to be fully blue-pilled about these topics in private conversation. Although, on the other hand he has no way of knowing for sure who is a shill and who isn't. He wanted to play it safe even though it meant he would alienate all the best researchers on the site by doing so....I brought this up with the mods multiple times. I said something like: How are you not banning flat earth tards/shills but telling everyone DEW's do not exist when it is literally on Lockheed Martin's website?. Then mentioned how most stickies used to get 400 to 500 updoots before mods went full retard. Then again maybe half of those were bots that they had banned during that time....Only the mods really know and they have done an amazing Job in many many ways....If you don't believe me just look at the other .win sites.
TLDR, dunno what to tell you. Only thing I’ve had removed was on “chemtrails”, but which was later allowed, as were DEWs. In both cases, valid research or not, there isn’t exactly a high level of responsive or preventative action that can be taken on either subject, so I’m not sure what the actual impacts are. For whatever it’s worth, there’s also no “free speech” in the military, which is kinda how I see our position, Digital Soldier, nor are the forum mods Congress, nor are they excessively censorial. It’s tended to be pretty clear guardrails set around specific topics from what I’ve seen.
If they start removing actionable research on how to be freer and healthier and more righteous, or of decodes or major habbenings, as opposed to simply being aware of certain things, by all means, hammer that alarm bell, but by what I’ve seen, we’ve lost exponentially more, and much more important work, from disgruntled posters who’ve reacted by fully censoring themselves, voluntarily. 😞
Kek, I get where you are coming from and agree with what you are trying to say but don't forget that the commies/globalists want everyone to "be of one mind" as well. Individual thought is the most important things in the universe.
C5 is a retard for doing a lot of other things (and trust me I've argued with him a lot about many of the directions he took this site in) but I don't think this is one of them. I think he did take a silly position by trying to flat out deny the existence of dews/chemtrails/etc but we also don't know exactly what the mods were being instructed/forced to do over the last few years.
C5 is a retard for preventing us talking about this.
Nope I disagree. it was needed to prevent the board from going to far extreme. Clouding the other info that needed to come out. Time and place for everything..it's similar to the Jew talks. Gotta make sure we don't lose sight of what we are doing here. It all served a purpose. Mods do an amazing job, a tough job but they have remained mission focused this whole time. Guardians over this place.
It also allowed the admin and leaders here to really test the anons and see who is who, how they react to conflict and leadership, team player or solo. Lots of good info was gathered
The idea that we should discourage (or more importantly, censor) any topic in the framework of the Great Awakening is exactly how the Cabal works, not legitimate investigators.
It's not about the topic, it's how it's presented. (This is the case for all relevant topics, not just the Jews.) If you show the evidence in a non-aggressive or not "This is the truth" way, that is exactly how people learn the truth. I assert that is WHY people are awakening to the truth (on all topics). The reason we are able to even begin to talk about "the Jew" debate is because WE have given evidence that people are willing to see. That evidence leads to other evidence, and the discussion begins to create an Awakening. You are giving way too much credit to Q (and the Censors) and way too little for investigative anons.
In general, your assessment of the situation and applauding the censorship of legitimate evidence is... I'll call it, "missing the entire point."
I simply am sharing what the Lord has revealed to me about this place and the leaders. You are free to see it how you want. I might have a unique understanding that few do. The story will continue to unfold :)
We can agree to pray on each other's words.
I appreciate that information is coming in (by the Q team) in it's proper time and place. That's what Q meant (in part) when they said, "Enjoy the Show."
But we are not Q. The censors here are not Q. And Q never discouraged any topic, and they certainly never censored any investigation. On the contrary, that is the opposite of their entire purpose.
The censorship here (that is topical) is pure evil. I'm not saying that any censor here is intentionally evil, but their actions of censorship are evil (and against Q). And, in some cases, I'm fairly certain some of our mods are controlled opposition. I'm not naming names, and my thoughts on this probably aren't what people would think, but that is a topic I won't elaborate, and I can't be certain regardless.
There is a difference between guiding the narrative and censoring the truth.
One is the guiding hand of the Director. The other is the most important tool of the Cabal (see 1A).
You are correct. When we moved over from Reddit and voat there was direct understanding of forum sliding measures and sensitivity to having the website banned and blacklisted. People forget the political and economic climate after the election was stolen. Anons were down and shills were spamming the boards to demoralize and also posting legit crazy things to paint us all with a broad stroke.
This is pretty well the same impression I got, and I don’t like being told to be quiet, but as explained it was never “this will not be discussed” but more “it’s not the right time to discuss this”, which comes off differently.
“I have this raging case of diarrhea, here are the symptoms, here’s some episodes I’ve had, heres what it got onto and how I cleaned it up, and here’s the rotten stuff that might have caused it.”
Do you discuss this
u/StormzAComing
This is a false analogy. You are suggesting the removal of posts that are "off topic." But if the diarrhea was topical it would be a completely different situation. Like, what if that was a symptom of Covid v. 3.0 (Sars was v. 1.0) and not discussing it was essential to the exposure of the evil? Then censoring the important information about diarrhea would be evil and possibly deadly (murderous) on a massive scale.
In this case, we are talking about DEWs. They are topical to Q (clearly). But DEWs have been censored repeatedly with legitimate research and evidence.
I keep trying to help people understand that CENSORSHIP is not the same thing as "disagreeing with," or "thinking we should be focused on something else right now," etc. CENSORSHIP (in this case) IS ELIMINATING TOPICAL INFORMATION FROM INVESTIGATING RESEARCHERS.
I keep saying this, and the proponents of censorship keep ignoring it (this is not the first time this has come up, including with mods). I'm talking about TOPICAL, LEGITIMATE information and discussions, not "stuff that doesn't belong here." Unfortunately, if there is a whimsical power to determine "what is appropriate" it can be abused (we see that regarding censorship all the time in the news; see "hate speech"). That abuse has happened many, many times here.
That is what I'm talking about.
The problem though was that C5 pretended to be fully blue-pilled about these topics in private conversation. Although, on the other hand he has no way of knowing for sure who is a shill and who isn't. He wanted to play it safe even though it meant he would alienate all the best researchers on the site by doing so....I brought this up with the mods multiple times. I said something like: How are you not banning flat earth tards/shills but telling everyone DEW's do not exist when it is literally on Lockheed Martin's website?. Then mentioned how most stickies used to get 400 to 500 updoots before mods went full retard. Then again maybe half of those were bots that they had banned during that time....Only the mods really know and they have done an amazing Job in many many ways....If you don't believe me just look at the other .win sites.
Unfortunately, every case of diarrhea (jet screamers) that I've ever had was always pretty deep. I could only wish that it was topical.
I had a reply written on this but lost it.
TLDR, dunno what to tell you. Only thing I’ve had removed was on “chemtrails”, but which was later allowed, as were DEWs. In both cases, valid research or not, there isn’t exactly a high level of responsive or preventative action that can be taken on either subject, so I’m not sure what the actual impacts are. For whatever it’s worth, there’s also no “free speech” in the military, which is kinda how I see our position, Digital Soldier, nor are the forum mods Congress, nor are they excessively censorial. It’s tended to be pretty clear guardrails set around specific topics from what I’ve seen.
If they start removing actionable research on how to be freer and healthier and more righteous, or of decodes or major habbenings, as opposed to simply being aware of certain things, by all means, hammer that alarm bell, but by what I’ve seen, we’ve lost exponentially more, and much more important work, from disgruntled posters who’ve reacted by fully censoring themselves, voluntarily. 😞
Wow fren really well said and great example..thanks for putting it into better words then I could.
This place has a far greater story then many understand..I'm so excited to watch that story be revealed for all to see. God wins.
Love you fren. Thanks for being such a loving presence in my life
Can we agree to pray on each others words and let the Spirit bring us to one mind??
Kek, I get where you are coming from and agree with what you are trying to say but don't forget that the commies/globalists want everyone to "be of one mind" as well. Individual thought is the most important things in the universe.
Was this for me?
Don't you love it when he puts up a low effort post and immediately stickies it? Yeah, I think the term retard applies quite well.
And don't forget his chemtrail shilling.
C5? You mean the boomer expat admin who fled America to go live in Malta with his multiple retirement funds??? That c5?
Colour me shocked. 🙄
-_- I think he lives in southeast Asia, dude...
C5 is a retard for doing a lot of other things (and trust me I've argued with him a lot about many of the directions he took this site in) but I don't think this is one of them. I think he did take a silly position by trying to flat out deny the existence of dews/chemtrails/etc but we also don't know exactly what the mods were being instructed/forced to do over the last few years.