👉🏻 https://x.com/113official/status/2015201496217088050
👉🏻 https://nitter.net/113official/status/2015201496217088050
The Hidden Empire:
Contrary to popular perception, Klaus Schwab neither founded nor strategically directed the WEF, some of its members rank far higher than him in the globalist pecking order.
It was founded by Otto von Habsburg, who arranged in advance for Kissinger to mentor Schwab as its puppet figurehead.
The Habsburgs were behind Federal Europe and Le Cercle, the latter far higher and more hidden than the WEF in the hierarchy.
The WEF was originally the “European Management Symposium,” and it openly admits: “Klaus Schwab had two important mentors: Henry Kissinger, (his former professor at Harvard,) and Edward Heath, the (symposium’s chair.)”
What connects the Habsburgs to Bauer (Rothschild), and families like Cecil, Saxe-Coburg, Astor, Huguenot Roquefueilles (Rockefeller), Del Banco (Warburg), Morgan, etc, and their senior agents such as Kissinger, Soros, Albright, Gates, etc, are ancient Roman aristocratic lineages, funnelled through orders like Malta, Templar, Garter, Rose Croix, and Jesuits.
Their ultimate authorities include Massimo, Medici/Pallavicini, Farnese/Bourbon-Two Sicilies, Lancelotti, Borghese, Odescalchi, Torlonia, etc.
These represent the apex of a direct lineage from the Roman dynasty.
The Massimo family name even adorns the Fabian Society, echoing Quintus Fabius Maximus.
The British Empire is simply a subset and strong-arm of the Roman Empire.
Thus, the “visible” apex of the globalist structure aligns with the head of the British establishment: the Privy Council, Rhodes-Milner group, and Fabians.
The US, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Israel, and Iran are all examples of British colonies to this day.
“And he who is and remains emperor of the Romans is also emperor of the whole earth” — George Trapezuntios, Greek philosopher, to Mehmet the Conqueror in 1466, after the 1453 conquest of Istanbul.
This same ancient dynasty generated nearly all European (and much other) royalty and aristocracy through the centuries.
Also controlled by Malta is the Rothschilds' Rhodes-Milner group, itself far higher than the WEF (which is one of its many doctrinal and institutional great-grandchildren).
Along with the political Vatican, Crown Temple, Washington D.C., Templars, Garter, Rose Croix, and Jesuit Order, these form the principal apparatuses by which the real heads, who created and own them, run the show.
They're not foolish enough to put themselves on display.
The goal is that people like us never discover who's truly in charge, because the (so-called) elite fears most the world masses uniting and seizing the heads of the snake.
Everything said by Schwab, Fink, Hoffmann, etc., is scripted for them, just as Karl Marx, Lenin, Mussolini, Hitler, and others were fully scripted puppets, put on full display.
The empire destroyed in Rev 17 & 18 is London & England! Yes that's what many believe. Others argue that Revelation 17 describes the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70, not Rome or a future global system.
Revelation uses the phrase "the great city" consistently. Revelation 11:8 states "the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified." That can ONLY be Jerusalem. Then in Revelation 17-18" we see "the great city", "the woman', "Babylon the Great". John is using symbolic names for apostate Jerusalem, just as the prophets did.
Revelation 17 describes a harlot guilty of blood. That language is straight out of the OT prophets - and it's applied to Jerusalem, NOT Rome.
Examples: Isaiah 1:21 - "How the faithful city has become a harlot"; Jeremiah 2-3; Ezekiel 16 & 23 (explicit harlot imagery); Lamentations 1. Revelation isn't inventing new imagery - it's recycling covenant-lawsuit language.
I could continue if you like....
Go ahead.
But you can also note that Rome is known as the "Mother of all Harlots."
Sure I'd be glad to:
Drunk with the blood of the saints? Rev. 17:6 - "drunk with the blood of the saints and the righteous blood shed on the earth..."
Luke 13:33 - "it cannot be that a prophet perish outside of Jerusalem".
Rome persecuted Christians, yes - but Jerusalem killed the prophets and handed Jesus to Rome.
The woman rides the beast (Rome)? In Rev. 17 the woman (Babylon) rides the beast. The Beast equals the Roman Empire while the Woman equals Jerusalem.
Jerusalem depended on Roman power, favor & enforcement until Rome turned and destroyed her in AD 70. Roman troops would ultimately burn the city and temple under General Titus.
How about the 7 mountains? Well when most think of the city on 7 hills they think of Rome. Rev. 17:9 - "The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits". Rome had 7 hills - BUT so did Jerusalem in ancient sources (Mount Zion, Moriah, Bezetha, Acra, Ophel, etc.
Also "mountains" in Scripture often mean kingdoms or authorities (Dan 2: Jer 51:25). Apostle John explains the symbol in Rev. 17:10 - "they are seven kings". So the text itself moves from geography to political power.
"Where the Lord was crucified" - Revelation already anchors the book of Revelation to Jerusalem explicitly (Rev. 11:8). Wouldn't it be strange for John to clearly identify Jerusalem once then suddenly switch "the great city" to Rome with no notice?
Then you have the time statements in Revelation. There are actually 11 time statements. Rev. 1:1 - "must shortly take place"; Rev. 1:3; 22:10 - "the time is near". Revelation describes the end of the Old Covenant age, not the end of the planet.
There is a strong, internally consistent biblical argument that Rev. 17 (& much of 18) describes Jerusalem' destruction in AD 70, using prophetic symbolism drawn from the Old Testament.
I would have to argue that Rome took over Jerusalem's power even before AD 70. The reason is because the Jews had to conscript to Rome. We see this at both ends of the life of Jesus. At the beginning, Joseph and Mary had to travel to Bethlehem for a census. At the end, the requirement for Jesus to be put to death required the approval of Roman Governor Pontius Pilate. It is likely that Revelation 17 and 18 is also describing Rome as it currently exists, and boy does Rome have power. I would also argue that Revelation's time statements are consistent with the rest of the bible as the weeks and months are on biblical time. I think Rome took on the role of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
Ive had it out with Root before on this. He's super convinced kek
I think his position is weak, but he will have to figure that out.
He simply cannot show that JERUSALEM, the annex of Rome, then wiped off the map for 2,000 years and now its some measley little blip in the ME, meanwhile Rome has existed as Papal Rome for the whole time, has global presence and influence, way more money than Israel, I mean emperors submitted to the pope for centuries, and he still says its Jerusalem.
I think this is what you are missing in your analysis: who was the primary audience that John was writing to? It was the 7 churches in Asia in the 1st century. Why would John describe "Rome as it currently exists"? In the year 2026?
Listen - the main difference between you and me is that you are a dispensationalist - right? I am not. Have a nice day!