The Cult of Morpheus - On the Misappropriation of the Q Drops and the Hijacking of the Great Awakening By Burning Bright
(substack.com)
🤜 FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! 🤛
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (83)
sorted by:
Good candidates are not winning everywhere. Sorry I have a realistic attitude...
It's a legitimate question to ask, and one I ask myself a lot. If this world is only temporary, why are we fighting for anything about it? Does God care about countries or governments? Revelations tells us the devil has his time, and there's no stopping that. Maybe Q invoked God to add a little pizzazz to their posts, who knows?
How do you mean? We, regular everyday people, won't be doing those things. That would be the military. You suggest doing more than sitting on the sidelines. Well, (and I'm not suggesting it or condoning it but pointing out one possible outcome) some people want a fight, some want to instigate a fight and make the other side strike first, because there's a lot of people who feel it's next to impossible to reconcile with the others on things like abortion, illegal immigration, etc.
Regardless of protestors being paid, those people are willing to take time out of their day to do it; there's no reasoning with people like that, nor will you likely reach them with a sermon, as they gain entertainment by trying to trash on one's faith. Just simple reality. I'm not sure how those people would ever be reached or brought back from the ledge. So what is to be done with them? Is that for us to decide, or Q?
And we regular everyday people don't have the power to lock people up. We rely on the rule of law for that, and the people tasked with upholding the law as agents of it.
I am hearing conflicting messages. It really doesn't sound like you are waiting on the final act - it sounds like you want to take some kind of action outside the information & political sphere.
I think the best thing you could do right now is study the Q drops. There are fundamental concepts that need to be incorporated into your analysis of current events in order to see them with any clarity.
If you're hearing that from all I've said, I think it's what you want to hear. If anything, I'd like more action by Kash and Bondi, and I'm certainly not alone in that.
You're interpretation is no more concrete than anyone else's, where there is room for interpretation. No one can agree on things like what "Watch the water" means, be it snake venom or the Potomac sewage, or some of the other things in the drops. Can you?
Not trying to be mean, but Instead of talking down to people, and acting like you're in the know because of your faith, how about just being conversational, eh? You have your interpretations and others have their own. Neither you or anyone else is right, at this moment in time. And it certainly doesn't mean we all echo a mentality of accepting monarchs as the true rulers.
Have a good one.
Actually, some people agree on <this interpretation> and others agree on <that interpretation>, all the time. If you miss this point, you're ignoring certain realities.
I know you are talking to Don't Tread here, but I think this approach is essentially moral relativism.
Obviously, Q had intentions when they posted and said certain things. Not knowing what is the 'right' or correct interpretation doesn't mean all interpretations are equal.
You're saying that Don't's interpretation is <no more concrete> is essentially just you admitting <I have no idea whether its a good interpretation or not>. Fair enough, but then you do not get to claim that interpretation is <no more correct>. Just admit that you don't know, and have no idea, or own the interpretation that you yourself have adopted.
It's clear that you have your interpretations, but you seem to want to avoid any moral responsibility for that by saying (paraphrase) 'hey, all interpretations are equal, and no one can know which is better'.
It seems like you think there is no actual right way of understanding, so any and every understanding can/should be ignored. Except the one you yourself have arrived at, guiding you to make your choice to "Just sit(ting) back waiting on the final act."
I'm not criticizing that. If that's your view, it's your view.
Obviously, there are limitations on what we can definitively understand. The Q drops deliberately employ a Socratic method, not to give people answers, but to get them to question.
You've misrepresented what I wrote. I never said "all", and I absolutely do not think that all echo that mentality.
No, I don't think every understanding can/should be ignored. It's that sometimes the drops speak plainly, and they don't. I understand that "disinfo is necessary," and I've even toyed with the idea that sometimes that disinfo may even have been necessarily used on us. With that in mind, I try to parse the drops for what is something with actual meat, and what is just "fluff" for those black hats who undoubtedly have gone over the drops too.
So I think there is a right way to interpret them (not saying I know what it is), but I also believe there is a lot of noise coming from people, such as those who are eager to be the first to crack the code for the sake of clout, like Paytriots. Some people see it and run with it, without proper discernment, and it turns out to be a red herring or something. I watched the "snake venom in the water supply" thing play out. To me, that was kind of a low point for this whole thing, because it just didn't hold water (no pun intended) under basic scrutiny.
That's what I mean by sitting back and waiting for the final act of this movie.
You said you are not pleased with progress made...and yet you are content waiting for the next act and do not think it worth your trouble to get involved in local politics. Nothing in there is "what I want to hear" they are your words.
This forum is for people who support and are familiar with Q. Do not confuse friendly advice for condescension. If you are not willing to inform yourself of the basic lessons Q taught us then your time here will be short.
Am I the only one to express displeasure at the speed (or perceived lack thereof) of progress on this board? Many people have called for the firing of Bondi or Kash on here, or at least expressed their distrust of one or the other.
I live in a blue state, I really don't think someone who is MAGA would win in it. I never said it was not worth my trouble; I said
There have been great candidates who haven't won, explicitly because of those tactics we see daily. It's worth my trouble, but there is no path to victory, yet.
And as for your words, and I know its a sidebar rule, you said
When that is not what I have ever expressed, especially when I said
In the response above. Is that why you turned your mod flair on?
I support Q, and I'm trying to learn, that doesn't mean I'm not allowed to have questions along the way.