BRITISH TIMES - British Royal Navy will take the lead in forming an alliance to reopen the Strait of Hormuz — IT'S ALL STARTING TO MAKE SENSE
(media.greatawakening.win)
- UK LEADERSHIPS! -
Sauce: https://x.com/disclosetv/status/2036501416919834735
OK, this was discussed days ago (MVP u/RitcherBelmont), but, I think this is important enough to bring back up so all frogs see it. It's all starting to make sense that this is the right interpretation of events. There was this other tweet which said:
https://x.com/johnkonrad/status/2036493725182963934
Also. Know why my instincts tell that this guy is on the money here with this? Because fvckwits like this show up:
https://x.com/chris_gerrib/status/2034330703412822495
Imagine being this simple, after watching the Dems get non-stop REKT the past 12 years. Unreal.
Talking of panicking... my son told me last night he's seeing people say we will see another shut down of everything like during cvd. Price of gas and food skyrocketing, shelves being cleared.... because of all the stuff going on with Iran & Texas. At first, I was like...nah, but then I just saw this morning about a million acres of farmland for cows in Nebraska is in flames, and makes me wonder who is doing this, is it on purpose or is it a coincidence? Still not panicking though, lol. Just thought wth is going on? Trying to make Trump economy tank, to make him look bad because dems don't know what else to do?
🚨Nearly 1 Million Acres are on Fire in Nebraska — The Largest in state history — Ranchers Devastated
🔻 Direct Rancher Losses: Fires burned critical Sandhills prairie/grazing land supporting ~35,000–40,000 head of cattle (Nebraska = #2 U.S. cattle-producing state). Destroyed fencing, stockpiled hay, and some structures; livestock deaths appear minimal but herds displaced. Long-term: Soil sterilization in spots may require reseeding; ranchers face multi-year rebuild. Recovery of native grassland could take years; many ranchers now seeking alternative pasture, supplemental feed, or FORCED SALES.
Bottom line… it hits ranchers hard (livelihoods, operations) and ripples into U.S. beef supply/food prices at a vulnerable time.
https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/2036455654664048753?s=20
Ill bet the land recovers in a year of they get the water. Fire rejuvenates even after destruction. Those prairies used to burn all the time. Thst grass has cast seed thst still sits in the soil.
The Ogalalla aquifer is under that fire. Kill the prairie and make way for AI server farms that need the water?
That aquifer is vital to Nebraska, western Kansas, very eastern Colorado and down into the panhandle of Texas and Oklahoma. That aquifer is huge and vital to agriculture.
And that number of head affected is only about 10% of what we slaughter every month. Really bad for the ranchers in that area, but it's a big country
It is bad. My son in law told me the national herd is down about 3 ton4 million head. Theyre making good money because.of it but everyone is fightinig to increase their herds.
But each head of cattle weighs about #200 more than they did around 10 years ago. Herd size was reduced due to drought and other conditions. Herd size does need to be increased and that will mean less going to slaughter in the short term. We export large amounts of what we produce in this country.
In my opinion, existing regulations create monopolies at the meat packers and give them an advantage to manipulate the market. I have full confidence that our ranchers and farmers can produce enough to feed our nation and do it so well that we have enough to export. It's the politicians I don't trust. I will agree that the situation is bad, but we are a very resilient nation and as long as we can keep the politicians out of the food supply, we will be fine. I just feel we need to focus on the choke point that the government is creating.
The surface burned, but I think the root system is still intact. Hopefully will grow back in a few months this spring. It’s a hell of a mess to sort everything out and get the fences up. Plus they’ll need to bring in food for the time being.
Not possible if we're going to Trump the midterms.
Lol. I see what you did.
That is an amazing hypothesis. Well worth the read. I didn't catch it the first time round but I'm sure glad I did this time.
Key points, highly recommend reading through. The guy did expert analysis.
https://gcaptain.com/the-hormuz-hypothesis-what-if-the-u-s-navy-isnt-in-a-hurry-to-reopen-the-strait/
Then Trump did something that almost nobody in the press understood.
He ordered the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation to create a $20 billion maritime reinsurance facility, with Chubb as lead underwriter, making the United States government the insurer of last resort for Gulf shipping. A sovereign nation positioned itself as the backstop for war risk insurance on the world’s most critical maritime chokepoint. The DFC facility, coordinated with US Central Command and Treasury, offers hull, machinery, and cargo coverage on a rolling basis to eligible vessels.
The United States now controls the on/off switch for the Strait of Hormuz. Not through naval firepower. Through insurance.
Strike Iran, and Europe either bends or goes dark in an energy crisis.
European naval forces are too small, too slow, and too poorly equipped for sustained convoy escort operations through a contested strait. All the European navies combined could not send more than three ships at a time to defend the Red Sea. An entire German task force sailed around Africa to avoid it.
Eventually Europe will have to capitulate to get the U.S. Navy, and the U.S. insurance backstop, to fully reopen the Strait.
What does “capitulate” look like? The IMO carbon tax. Greenland. Tariff concessions. The SHIPS Act. Every maritime policy priority that Europe and China have been blocking for the past year.
The “closure” is really a sorting mechanism. Iran decides who trades and who does not. Unless the U.S. Navy reopens it for everyone. On America’s terms.
That’s the decision the world has to make, let Iran pull up a tollbooth or stop blocking Trump’s maritime plans.
While TV oil analysts focus on the global price of oil, the real experts in Houston are watching something different: the fracturing of the global energy market.
The real threat is not $200 oil. It’s a fracture of the system. It is cheap energy in export nations and ruinous energy costs in places far from reserves. It’s $2 oil in the Persain Gulf, $20 dollar oil in the Gulf of America and $2,000 oil in the UK.
Trump issued a 60-day Jones Act waiver and opened Venezuelan oil sales to U.S. companies via a new Treasury license for PDVSA. These are exactly the moves you make if you are trying to drive U.S. prices down while the global market fractures.
The biggest pushback on the Iran strikes among Democrats and the mainstream press is the question: what is the endgame?
He has one. But maybe he cannot say it out loud.
Because the endgame is leverage. And you do not announce leverage. You apply it.
Britain can't man is ships. They are kaput.
KEK, saying "kaput" with regards to the UK navy
Britain is in terminal decline, the dying spams of an empire in play.
The French would build a seawall and then never man it.
How many rowboats are they up to now?
Applying leverage without firing a shot...
Silent weapons for silent wars?
Like the ones involving Europe, UK & China; Joe sixpack has no clue about?
u/#5dchess
Oh for phucks sake.. this is a picture showing HMS Ocean which was decommisioned in 2018 and sold to Brazil as NAM Atlantico, it was converted from a Ro-Ro ferry into an LPH and is not built to military spec.
Who are British Times when they are at home? Who is this unamed intelligence source? This tread is just fear porn disinfo.
The British navy is a joke. They can't do squat without help.
Surface vessels only I expect...the submariners are all in "drug rehab" these days.
Well, they wouldn't really escort anything using subsurface assets anyway because the purpose of escort is visibility, and although a submarine could definitely add some serious firepower, the strait this notoriously difficult for shipping. I believe there has already been a submarine collision there, I think it was back in 1988
All true....but in saying it I was being silly as I had remembered the following:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/britains-nuclear-submarines-carnage-nearly-36904383
:)
https://youtu.be/qfwTRVnO5No?si=QaPK5fQizU7dVQMx
Put a few A-10 Warthogs and some Apaches overhead as well.
Awwww their little boats are so cute!