Artists will utilize the tools presented to them. And that's what this is.
If you can write a first draft of a novel from your personal outline in 3 minutes, then do a real rewrite, you've saved countless days, weeks or more. And it's still yours, you wrote it. But you've replaced the agonizing first step of the first draft.
Music-get rough drafts of your song ideas in minutes, and riff off of that. seriously, you know how many times I've been with a band that takes a month to even get a "scratch" version of one song idea? Now you can get a template to work off of in minutes.
Its not a tool, its a crutch. People are using it as a replacement for creativity. The harder you have to work on something the more value it has in your eyes. If JRR Tolkien used AI to "save time" on The Lord of the Rings it would be trash.
This is why its called Slop. It has almost no value because no effort was expended in its creation. Zero passion. Just numbers run through an expensive calculator so they can mimic the heights if human creativity.
I always find it funny... This reaction when you probably enjoy Marvel movies and the aforementioned Lord of the Rings. {And that's not a slag off, just they're heavily CGI.}
And I'm sure Cgi is fine with you , right? Green screen? Pro tools? Drum machines? Brian Eno? Kraftwerk? Sequencers? Samplers?
I don't know, how about the fucking industrial revolution?
Bottom line is it's always in how you use a tool whether it's a crutch or not. If you use it to get a rough draft from your original material, I fail to see the harm in it. Because it's not creating your "art" it's streamlining the process for you.
Artists will utilize the tools presented to them. And that's what this is.
If you can write a first draft of a novel from your personal outline in 3 minutes, then do a real rewrite, you've saved countless days, weeks or more. And it's still yours, you wrote it. But you've replaced the agonizing first step of the first draft.
Music-get rough drafts of your song ideas in minutes, and riff off of that. seriously, you know how many times I've been with a band that takes a month to even get a "scratch" version of one song idea? Now you can get a template to work off of in minutes.
Its not a tool, its a crutch. People are using it as a replacement for creativity. The harder you have to work on something the more value it has in your eyes. If JRR Tolkien used AI to "save time" on The Lord of the Rings it would be trash.
This is why its called Slop. It has almost no value because no effort was expended in its creation. Zero passion. Just numbers run through an expensive calculator so they can mimic the heights if human creativity.
Fuck. That.
I always find it funny... This reaction when you probably enjoy Marvel movies and the aforementioned Lord of the Rings. {And that's not a slag off, just they're heavily CGI.}
And I'm sure Cgi is fine with you , right? Green screen? Pro tools? Drum machines? Brian Eno? Kraftwerk? Sequencers? Samplers?
I don't know, how about the fucking industrial revolution?
Bottom line is it's always in how you use a tool whether it's a crutch or not. If you use it to get a rough draft from your original material, I fail to see the harm in it. Because it's not creating your "art" it's streamlining the process for you.
CGI is different than AI generated and you fucking know it. Clown.
Found the Marvel idiot. ^
Aka, hypocrite.
Practical effects pioneers like Tom Savini and Rick Baker had to adapt to cgi because practical effects were being phased out. They had no choice.
That's my entire point. New tech comes, and you incorporate it into your workflow.
What you don't do is whinge about, clutching pearls.
Tim's Vermeer...