I didn't delete it, but last night I saw it was gone. I assume only Mods have that power. 🤷‍♂️

But I'll rephrase my earlier response since I may have had my hand slapped:

Per Q-post #1658 & 59 above, Q is pointing out that the number of Sealed Indictments (meaning a Grand Jury has convened and agreed that the charges have merit) have skyrocketed since Trump came into office back in 2017.

In 2018, Q told us via Post 2211

But… interestingly, if nothing is being done behind the scenes, why are there 50,000+ sealed indictments across the US [what % = USA v. X?]?

As you dig into the court dockets, the cases are labeled as Criminal Sealed Indictments (meaning a specific DOCUMENT). This document is hidden from the public so that the criminals don't get tipped off and flee / destroy evidence etc.

The Bad-Boys.us site does a good job at helping filter out the noise so just like above where Q asked, what percentage of these court cases are USA vs X (defendants). I found scores on individual district court dockets and via a small sample I had time to download and review, HUNDREDS more are "Sealed vs Sealed".

I used AI to summarize a case that was on a Boston court docket "United States vs xxx xxx". I assume it was previously sealed as the case had progressed from 2021 as a vague "narcotics charge" to trafficking 2 kilos of Fentanyl nearly 1,000 Fentanyl pills and nearly 6,000 counterfeit pills.

Regarding Sealed Cases, they are similar and are used to protect sensitive information (names of minors, victims, pending warrants, informants, etc) where they don't want to tip off the criminals.

According to Post 3711 Q says it's worth remembering that:

The Storm Sequence of Events: Horowitz IG Report > Comey Report > Declas of FISA > Indictments

Hope this helps!

A sealed indictment is a formal criminal charge issued by a grand jury that remains confidential until authorities are ready to act, such as arresting suspects or executing searches. Sealing prevents the accused from being alerted, reducing the risk of flight, destruction of evidence, or intimidation of witnesses.

Sealed indictments in U.S. courts are effective tools in RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) cases, enabling prosecutors to target and dismantle organized crime networks efficiently. Here's a summary of their effectiveness and use in such cases:

Effectiveness in RICO Cases - Concealment for Strategic Timing: RICO cases often involve complex networks of individuals engaged in ongoing criminal enterprises (e.g., drug trafficking, extortion, money laundering). Sealed indictments allow prosecutors to build cases against multiple defendants without tipping them off, ensuring simultaneous arrests to disrupt the entire organization. Example: In large-scale operations like those targeting drug cartels or mafia groups, sealed indictments help coordinate raids and arrests across jurisdictions, preventing key players from escaping or coordinating defenses.

Protecting Investigations: By keeping charges secret, prosecutors can continue gathering evidence, conducting wiretaps, or working with informants without interference from suspects who might otherwise alter their behavior or destroy evidence. This is critical in RICO cases, where proving a "pattern of racketeering activity" requires extensive evidence of multiple criminal acts over time.

Facilitating Cooperation: Sealed indictments can pressure lower-level operatives to cooperate once arrested, as they may not know who else has been indicted. This can lead to plea deals, where defendants provide information to build cases against higher-ranking members of the criminal enterprise. Example: In cases like those against the Gambino crime family, sealed indictments have led to flipped informants who provide critical testimony to convict leaders.

*Broadening the Net: *RICO allows prosecutors to charge individuals who may not have directly committed crimes but participated in or benefited from the criminal enterprise. Sealed indictments enable authorities to target a wide range of actors— from foot soldiers to leaders—simultaneously, ensuring the entire network is disrupted. The secrecy helps prevent premature leaks that could allow key figures to evade capture.

How Sealed Indictments Are Used in RICO Cases Investigation Phase: Prosecutors work with law enforcement (e.g., FBI, DEA) to gather evidence, often over years, using surveillance, informants, or undercover operations. A grand jury reviews the evidence and issues indictments, which are then sealed by a judge to maintain confidentiality.

*Coordination Across Jurisdictions: *RICO cases often span multiple states or countries. Sealed indictments allow federal and state agencies to coordinate large-scale operations, ensuring synchronized arrests and searches to maximize impact. Example: The 2011 takedown of 127 alleged members of La Cosa Nostra involved sealed indictments across multiple states, leading to one of the largest single-day operations against organized crime.

Execution and Unsealing: Once sufficient evidence is gathered and arrests are planned, indictments are unsealed, typically when defendants are arrested or arraigned. This timing ensures that the criminal organization is caught off-guard, limiting their ability to reorganize or retaliate.

Legal Advantage: Sealed indictments in RICO cases often include charges for predicate acts (e.g., murder, extortion, fraud) alongside the broader RICO conspiracy charge, allowing prosecutors to target both individual crimes and the overarching criminal enterprise. The threat of lengthy RICO sentences (up to 20 years per count, plus asset forfeiture) incentivizes cooperation, further weakening the organization.

Challenges and Considerations Resource-Intensive:* Building a RICO case with sealed indictments requires significant time, manpower, and coordination, which can strain prosecutorial and law enforcement resources. Risk of Leaks: While rare, premature leaks of sealed indictments can compromise investigations, though strict court protocols minimize this risk. Balancing Secrecy and Rights: Defendants have a right to a speedy trial, so sealed indictments must be unsealed within a reasonable timeframe to avoid legal challenges.

Unsealing means making the indictments publicly known and available to serve to the charged.