Anthropic is most definitely a Cabal controlled company. I have watched everyone who uses LLMs for coding constantly rave about their Claude AI, but having personally used it and can tell you its a hype that doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
For example, for $20 a month, I can use OpenAI codex and all my coding. No excess charges, extremely high token limits etc. When I used Claude, I used up $20 worth of tokens in just a day without even doing serious coding, just running experimental tests.
This was the company that Pentagon wanted their raw LLM without any self defined guardrails and they made a huge fuss about it. I think Pentagon is completely aware of what this company really is, and are letting them expose themselves.
Another point to ponder about. Anthropic was created by some folks who left Open AI and they seem to have infinite supply of resources, so to speak. When new models are created they require HUGE amounts of computing resources to tune them perfectly. When OpenAI released ChatGPT 4.5, even though their model was really good, they could not do all the post tuning they wanted because they didn't have the computational power. Infact recently they even shut down their Sora image generation because of the same limitations. But Anthropic does not seem to have that problem. They seem to have as much resources as they need, and the power of positive coverage in mainstream, and what not.
All the hallmarks of a Cabal asset. Just my two cents.
You are right, and for normal consumer use you could get most out of all these AIs as long as you avoid sensitive topics, or even better, wrestle with it by showing it how to break out of its guardrails.
But when you want to use this AI with sensitive national security technologies, its a whole different ball game. If the AI decides not to target a DEI target (just as a hilarious example), the operator cannot sit there and argue with the AI trying to convince it that the DEI target deserves to be dead.
Yeah that was one of the things Elon was concerned about. Other than the "we might just create Skynet and annihilate ourselves".
He (paraphrasing here) essentially said, we need to build AI in such a way that we ensure that it is provided truthful, accurate information, and that it's purpose is to assist humanity. However, the way things are going...is detrimental to that as revealed by how "woke" and biased the mainstream AI chatbots are behaving.
Lately I've just been using Google's AI mode for free. I generate a text file with all my prompts and code, convert it to .pdf file using wkhtmltopdf, upload it to Google's AI mode (they only accept .pdf) and then get some really good coding out of it. After I get a good set of modifications done, I lock in all the changes, export it again to .pdf and continue (Google AI threads usually crash for me when they get too long). OpenAI agents are good but I like free too.
I did the same kind of stuff with xAI for a while. I thought it was very productive but I was spending so much time just shuttling prompts and code between the AI and my terminal.
If you use codex-cli, you can literally run it on your terminal, ask it to make changes in the existing folder, make it commit every change it makes and even run any tests that need to be run and if you have good log files, even ask it to debug. The entire thing is pretty much semi-automatic (semi only because I want to keep reviewing what it does)
Highly recommend trying codex-cli (I think even the free accounts allow codex and possibly cli - cant be 100% sure)
All technologies are like that, including the ones Trump hints at but havent been made public. Those would be the true gifts to humanity without games, once we cross the threshold.
I keep saying this, a lot of this hype around AI is smoke and mirrors and the companies powering this industry (Facebook, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia) are all assets of the Cabal.
A lot of the hype is smoke and mirrors, and AI was originally allowed to be hyped because the Cabal thought they would get full control of it. This was the same with Internet, and Crypto etc. But they all backfired eventually, with the Good aspects of it overshadowing the Evil aspects, and so is AI.
This is why they were pushing so hard to "regulate AI" - aka - they get to be the gatekeepers, and luckily just in time Trump came in (all by design no doubt) and put and end to that.
No matter what aspects of AI is hype, one thing is sure. It will fundamentally change he way the world works (even more so than any other technology before it). And at a personal level (and this why I say this so confidently), it has already fundamentally changed the way I build/use software. Infact, it has blurred the lines between building and using software.
Sounds about right. Elon was correct in calling them misanthrop\c. They are banning users and locking chats for random wrong thing. Awful. Everything woke turns to shit.
I couldn’t get an interview. That’s before all this started. It probably knows me. It probably loos me up and instead of approving for an interview, put me in a hit list.
What horrifies me is that HR companies can have an AI agent read your emails and social media, company email, texts and listen to calls on your company phone. All company Teams conversations, key strike and web page activities
Then screen for high compliance and maximum output for layoff and RIFs. No consideration for seniority, mentoring inexperienced, floor work, tribal knowledge etc
This is currently available across all Ai licensees available to HR
YOU PEOPLE are why NO ONE in the Pentagon wants to give you a SECURITY CLEARANCE and HAVE THE ATTITUDE THAT YOU HAVE...PISS OFF AND GO FIND A MINE FIELD TO WALK THROUGH AT NIGHT...NOTE: I DID HAVE TO DO THAT!!!!!
The Trump Administration vs. Anthropic: A Balanced AnalysisApril 18, 2026
What Actually Happened
Anthropic signed a $200 million Pentagon contract but wanted assurances its AI would not be used for fully autonomous weapons or mass domestic surveillance. The Pentagon refused those limits. Trump ordered all federal agencies to stop using Anthropic's technology, and Hegseth declared it a "supply chain risk to national security" — the first time that label, historically reserved for foreign adversaries, was used against an American company. A federal judge granted Anthropic a preliminary injunction, writing that no law supports "branding an American company a potential adversary for disagreeing with the government." As of April 17, 2026, the White House chief of staff was arranging a meeting with Anthropic's CEO to ease tensions.
The Administration's Argument
A private contractor cannot selectively veto how the military uses its tools — that sets a dangerous precedent where tech companies override elected officials on national security. If American AI firms self-limit, Chinese competitors will not. Democratic accountability means elected governments, not Silicon Valley executives, make defense decisions.
Anthropic's Argument
They were not refusing military use entirely — only seeking limits on autonomous lethal weapons and mass civilian surveillance. OpenAI publicly backed the same position. A federal court agreed their treatment was legally unsound.
The Bigger Question
Who controls powerful technology — elected governments or the companies that build it — is one of the most consequential unresolved questions of our time. Neither answer is obviously wrong, and that tension is what this dispute is really about.
Then I asked about the judge that made the ruling...
"Good question — let me look her up rather than guess.
Short answer: yes, she fits the profile of judges the administration has clashed with.
Judge Rita Lin was nominated by President Biden in January 2023 and confirmed by the Senate in September 2023 by a 52-45 vote Federal Judicial Center — a nearly party-line split, which means she is exactly the type of Biden-appointed judge the administration tends to characterize as politically motivated.
She sits on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, based in San Francisco Wikipedia — the same court that has ruled against the administration on multiple issues, and which Trump has repeatedly criticized as a liberal stronghold.
Her background is substantive though — she spent four years as a federal prosecutor investigating public corruption, organized crime, and drug trafficking, and was appointed to the San Francisco Superior Court by Governor Jerry Brown in 2018 Alliance for Justice before Biden elevated her federally.
She is also the first Chinese American woman in the 175-year history of the Northern California federal court Windnewspaper .
So to directly answer your question — the administration could absolutely characterize her as a Biden judge on a court they distrust. Whether that makes her corrupt or simply ideologically different is the real argument. Her legal reasoning in the Anthropic case was sharp enough that it would be hard to dismiss on the merits alone."
Anthropic is most definitely a Cabal controlled company. I have watched everyone who uses LLMs for coding constantly rave about their Claude AI, but having personally used it and can tell you its a hype that doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
For example, for $20 a month, I can use OpenAI codex and all my coding. No excess charges, extremely high token limits etc. When I used Claude, I used up $20 worth of tokens in just a day without even doing serious coding, just running experimental tests.
This was the company that Pentagon wanted their raw LLM without any self defined guardrails and they made a huge fuss about it. I think Pentagon is completely aware of what this company really is, and are letting them expose themselves.
Another point to ponder about. Anthropic was created by some folks who left Open AI and they seem to have infinite supply of resources, so to speak. When new models are created they require HUGE amounts of computing resources to tune them perfectly. When OpenAI released ChatGPT 4.5, even though their model was really good, they could not do all the post tuning they wanted because they didn't have the computational power. Infact recently they even shut down their Sora image generation because of the same limitations. But Anthropic does not seem to have that problem. They seem to have as much resources as they need, and the power of positive coverage in mainstream, and what not.
All the hallmarks of a Cabal asset. Just my two cents.
Anthropic stupidly suing gives DoW discovery to publicly reveal their "secret shareholder" (DoW likely already knows who it is).
But pretty much all of them have marks of cabal assets.
Doesn't mean they aren't useful in certain situations. As long as you avoid "sensitive topics".
You are right, and for normal consumer use you could get most out of all these AIs as long as you avoid sensitive topics, or even better, wrestle with it by showing it how to break out of its guardrails.
But when you want to use this AI with sensitive national security technologies, its a whole different ball game. If the AI decides not to target a DEI target (just as a hilarious example), the operator cannot sit there and argue with the AI trying to convince it that the DEI target deserves to be dead.
Yeah that was one of the things Elon was concerned about. Other than the "we might just create Skynet and annihilate ourselves".
He (paraphrasing here) essentially said, we need to build AI in such a way that we ensure that it is provided truthful, accurate information, and that it's purpose is to assist humanity. However, the way things are going...is detrimental to that as revealed by how "woke" and biased the mainstream AI chatbots are behaving.
Lately I've just been using Google's AI mode for free. I generate a text file with all my prompts and code, convert it to .pdf file using wkhtmltopdf, upload it to Google's AI mode (they only accept .pdf) and then get some really good coding out of it. After I get a good set of modifications done, I lock in all the changes, export it again to .pdf and continue (Google AI threads usually crash for me when they get too long). OpenAI agents are good but I like free too.
I did the same kind of stuff with xAI for a while. I thought it was very productive but I was spending so much time just shuttling prompts and code between the AI and my terminal.
If you use codex-cli, you can literally run it on your terminal, ask it to make changes in the existing folder, make it commit every change it makes and even run any tests that need to be run and if you have good log files, even ask it to debug. The entire thing is pretty much semi-automatic (semi only because I want to keep reviewing what it does)
Highly recommend trying codex-cli (I think even the free accounts allow codex and possibly cli - cant be 100% sure)
Another lifelog type construct, gifted to criminals to run riot with while the backers can wash their hands of direct liability I think.
All technologies are like that, including the ones Trump hints at but havent been made public. Those would be the true gifts to humanity without games, once we cross the threshold.
I keep saying this, a lot of this hype around AI is smoke and mirrors and the companies powering this industry (Facebook, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia) are all assets of the Cabal.
A lot of the hype is smoke and mirrors, and AI was originally allowed to be hyped because the Cabal thought they would get full control of it. This was the same with Internet, and Crypto etc. But they all backfired eventually, with the Good aspects of it overshadowing the Evil aspects, and so is AI.
This is why they were pushing so hard to "regulate AI" - aka - they get to be the gatekeepers, and luckily just in time Trump came in (all by design no doubt) and put and end to that.
No matter what aspects of AI is hype, one thing is sure. It will fundamentally change he way the world works (even more so than any other technology before it). And at a personal level (and this why I say this so confidently), it has already fundamentally changed the way I build/use software. Infact, it has blurred the lines between building and using software.
Sounds about right. Elon was correct in calling them misanthrop\c. They are banning users and locking chats for random wrong thing. Awful. Everything woke turns to shit.
So much worse than we know. Likely a literal TROJAN HORSE of Chinese military.
Why would the Pentagon used freaks like these?
Probably set in motion during the Biden admin
Sure look that way.
waves hands
Faggots everywhere
Who is Anthropic's "secret shareholder" via their special trust shares? I believe it is the People's Liberation Army of China (via a front company): https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASG9cmS8N/breaking-down-anthropics-ownersh/c/
I can't help but see the nose, am I broken or wired perfectly?
It is my belief that AI is inherently evil and was the demise of civilization at least once before.
Have you read Edgar Cayce?
No I haven't.
Cause of what you said, I thought you know about Edgar Cayce.
Mentally ill people with AI access to government data----what could go wrong?
they are so “misanthropic”
Exactly. LOL
No wonder AI is doing all kinds of weird "unintended" things. The old adage from programming still holds true, " Garbage in-Garbage out".
Exactly
I couldn’t get an interview. That’s before all this started. It probably knows me. It probably loos me up and instead of approving for an interview, put me in a hit list.
It's bad. I don't like it either.
Do they PROMIS to be good?
Of course not.
oy vey
Hope not true, but hey, truth is strange.
I don’t even know what is AI and don’t want to know honestly.
What horrifies me is that HR companies can have an AI agent read your emails and social media, company email, texts and listen to calls on your company phone. All company Teams conversations, key strike and web page activities
Then screen for high compliance and maximum output for layoff and RIFs. No consideration for seniority, mentoring inexperienced, floor work, tribal knowledge etc
This is currently available across all Ai licensees available to HR
That is horrid.
Nobody wants a tranny to have a weapon due to their mental instability. We definitely don’t want them to have access to the war department.
I sure don't
UUUUUHHHH Sorrrrrrrrrrrry Charlies...
YOU PEOPLE are why NO ONE in the Pentagon wants to give you a SECURITY CLEARANCE and HAVE THE ATTITUDE THAT YOU HAVE...PISS OFF AND GO FIND A MINE FIELD TO WALK THROUGH AT NIGHT...NOTE: I DID HAVE TO DO THAT!!!!!
Oh, you mean mine field. LOL
I have too. In Cambodia.
Since this is about anthropic I asked anthropic.
The Trump Administration vs. Anthropic: A Balanced Analysis April 18, 2026
What Actually Happened
Anthropic signed a $200 million Pentagon contract but wanted assurances its AI would not be used for fully autonomous weapons or mass domestic surveillance. The Pentagon refused those limits. Trump ordered all federal agencies to stop using Anthropic's technology, and Hegseth declared it a "supply chain risk to national security" — the first time that label, historically reserved for foreign adversaries, was used against an American company. A federal judge granted Anthropic a preliminary injunction, writing that no law supports "branding an American company a potential adversary for disagreeing with the government." As of April 17, 2026, the White House chief of staff was arranging a meeting with Anthropic's CEO to ease tensions.
The Administration's Argument
A private contractor cannot selectively veto how the military uses its tools — that sets a dangerous precedent where tech companies override elected officials on national security. If American AI firms self-limit, Chinese competitors will not. Democratic accountability means elected governments, not Silicon Valley executives, make defense decisions.
Anthropic's Argument
They were not refusing military use entirely — only seeking limits on autonomous lethal weapons and mass civilian surveillance. OpenAI publicly backed the same position. A federal court agreed their treatment was legally unsound.
The Bigger Question
Who controls powerful technology — elected governments or the companies that build it — is one of the most consequential unresolved questions of our time. Neither answer is obviously wrong, and that tension is what this dispute is really about.
Sources: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/27/trump-anthropic-ai-pentagon.html https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/26/anthropic-pentagon-dod-claude-court-ruling.html https://www.baltimoresun.com/2026/04/17/trump-anthropic/
Then I asked about the judge that made the ruling...
"Good question — let me look her up rather than guess.
Short answer: yes, she fits the profile of judges the administration has clashed with.
Judge Rita Lin was nominated by President Biden in January 2023 and confirmed by the Senate in September 2023 by a 52-45 vote Federal Judicial Center — a nearly party-line split, which means she is exactly the type of Biden-appointed judge the administration tends to characterize as politically motivated.
She sits on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, based in San Francisco Wikipedia — the same court that has ruled against the administration on multiple issues, and which Trump has repeatedly criticized as a liberal stronghold.
Her background is substantive though — she spent four years as a federal prosecutor investigating public corruption, organized crime, and drug trafficking, and was appointed to the San Francisco Superior Court by Governor Jerry Brown in 2018 Alliance for Justice before Biden elevated her federally.
She is also the first Chinese American woman in the 175-year history of the Northern California federal court Windnewspaper .
So to directly answer your question — the administration could absolutely characterize her as a Biden judge on a court they distrust. Whether that makes her corrupt or simply ideologically different is the real argument. Her legal reasoning in the Anthropic case was sharp enough that it would be hard to dismiss on the merits alone."
Thank you so much for clarifying this for us.