Sounds like blatant threats. How do you do your job under the constant threat? Well we could ask James Comey I guess. Wait he was no longer employed and is guilty of illegal activities.
Rep Seth Moulton brought an illegal alien, Marcelo Gomes DaSilva, to Trump's State of the Union speech. DaSilva is an illegal alien who has no right to be in our country.
Where is Seth Moulton's loyalty? Is it to the USA?
My memory may be hazy, but if I am to trust it, I would says that Admiral Dönitz was the one responsible for the order NOT to take any crew of sinking ships on board.
So, the actual language should be: Dönitz was charged without a sentence following.
The reason? Subs are made for a specific size crew. There is no place to hold securely enemy mariners, lest the hole crew is put at danger. One outweighs the other. It is that simple. And besides, the allies has egg on their faces.
Read Carefully!
However, the proclamation of operational zones and the sinking of neutral merchant vessels which enter those zones presents a different question. This practice was employed in the War of 1914-18 by Germany and adopted in retaliation by Great Britain. The Washington conference of 1922, the London Naval Agreement of 1930, and the Protocol of 1936, were entered into with full knowledge that such zones had been employed in the First World War. Yet the Protocol made no exception for operational zones. The order of Doenitz to sink neutral ships without warning when found within these zones was, therefore, in the opinion of the Tribunal, violation of the Protocol.
It is also asserted that the German U-boat arm not only did not carry out the warning and rescue provisions of the Protocol but that Doenitz deliberately ordered the killing of survivors of shipwrecked vessels, whether enemy or neutral. The prosecution has introduced much evidence surrounding two orders of Doenitz, War Order No. 154, issued in 1939, and the so-called " Laconia " Order of 1942. The defence argues that these orders and the evidence supporting them do not show such a policy and introduced much evidence to the contrary. The Tribunal is of the opinion that the evidence does not establish with the certainty required that Doenitz deliberately ordered the killing of shipwrecked survivors. The orders were undoubtedly ambiguous and deserve the strongest censure.
The evidence further shows that the rescue provisions were not carried out and that the defendant ordered that they should not be carried out. The argument of the defence is that the security of the submarine is, as the first rule of the sea, paramount to rescue and that the development of aircraft made rescue impossible. This may be so, but the Protocol is explicit. If the commander cannot rescue, then under its terms he cannot sink a merchant vessel and should allow it to pass harmless before his periscope. The orders, then, prove Doenitz is guilty of a violation of the Protocol.
In view of all the facts proved and in particular of an order of the British Admiralty announced on the 8th May, 1940, according to which all vessels should be sunk at sight in the Skagerrak, and the answers to interrogatories by Admiral Nimitz stating that unrestricted submarine warfare was carried on in the Pacific Ocean by the United States from the first day that nation entered the war, the sentence of Doenitz is not assessed on the ground of his breaches of the international law of submarine warfare.
Striped marlin are one of the fastest fish and you troll for them at 6 to 8 knots. I think I read the drug boats travel at 35 to 40 knots. So they weren't trolling. No chairs on board. No rods. Sides about knee height so the fisherman would be dragged overboard if a big fish hit..
Does the idiot making these claims come from a land locked state because he has assuredly never laid eyes on a deep sea fishing boat. And never read Old Man and the Sea.
Their degree of panic is reassuring - it proves Hegseth et al are over the target
Sounds like blatant threats. How do you do your job under the constant threat? Well we could ask James Comey I guess. Wait he was no longer employed and is guilty of illegal activities.
Rep Seth Moulton brought an illegal alien, Marcelo Gomes DaSilva, to Trump's State of the Union speech. DaSilva is an illegal alien who has no right to be in our country.
Where is Seth Moulton's loyalty? Is it to the USA?
eh.... really?
My memory may be hazy, but if I am to trust it, I would says that Admiral Dönitz was the one responsible for the order NOT to take any crew of sinking ships on board.
So, the actual language should be: Dönitz was charged without a sentence following.
The reason? Subs are made for a specific size crew. There is no place to hold securely enemy mariners, lest the hole crew is put at danger. One outweighs the other. It is that simple. And besides, the allies has egg on their faces.
Read Carefully!
https://nitter.net/EricLDaugh/status/2049848743587987474
Striped marlin are one of the fastest fish and you troll for them at 6 to 8 knots. I think I read the drug boats travel at 35 to 40 knots. So they weren't trolling. No chairs on board. No rods. Sides about knee height so the fisherman would be dragged overboard if a big fish hit..
Does the idiot making these claims come from a land locked state because he has assuredly never laid eyes on a deep sea fishing boat. And never read Old Man and the Sea.
Ugh! Seth represents my district, he's loathsome