Time for crusades 2.0. Crusades 1.0 was defense. Remember this people…they will kill you and I unless we submit, convert, pay tribute and give them our women and treasure.
I've been thinking about this and the data centers fiasco. When PDJT stood up, after the assassination attempt, and said "fight, fight, fight", he wanted us all to fight for what we want. People are getting involved and that's what will make a difference, people that were never political or that have never fought against decisions that effect their lives so personally.
I fear because our politicians, who were supposed to be the elected leaders - and turn back this incompatibility with our US Constitution/western civilization - HAVE FAILED us, our alternative is nearly here.
We definitely need certain laws that put up guardrails to preserve the founding fathers vision and keep the American way of life, no Sharia, no Socialism, no communism, no dual loyalties, no open borders, yes to tough on crime. If you’re a politician and start spewing this nonsense you’re immediately dismissed, we are becoming way too lax on allowing this nonsense.
Anyone attempting to implement Sharia is attempting to overthrow the Constitution.
Additionally, start RICO investigations on every mosque in America. Muslims will attempt to strongarm people into believing their devil worshiping cult.
These demons need to go back and stop taking land that don’t belong to them. GO HOME, why are they here on first place? They will kill of us Christians?
This has nothing to do with freedom of religion. it has to do with there can only be ONE Supreme Law of our Land, and that is the Constitution. You seem to be under the false impression that freedom of religion means accommodating the overthrow of our Constitutional Republic.
Our founders knew that Islam was not compatible with our form of government, and never intended to welcome them here. Anyone coming here was required, IS required, to fully renounce any allegiance to foreign powers, and swear allegiance to the Constitution. That is why there is supposed to be a waiting period, ideally 14 years, before someone could be eligible for citizenship, because they would have to prove by deed, not just by word, that they are truly wanting to become an American.
That is also why there was NEVER any validity to the anchor baby citizenship BS.
To be direct, Muslim's are not eligible to run for government office if they believe in Sharia Law. If they believe in Sharia, they cannot take an oath to the Constitution.
I agree, but I don't see that we have a position that can be argued within the framework of the Constitution. Mainly, what I mean, is that we have a desired outcome, but not a constitutional campaign position or legislative solution.
One possibility is to define advocacy of Sharia Law to be sedition, and any attempt to implement it as seditious conspiracy. That leaves the freedom of religion intact. This is somewhat parallel to the problem of Thuggee being accepted as a legitimate religion (of the death-goddess Kali), when a tenet of its practice is the ritual murder of travelers. I suppose another way to frame this is that we have freedom of religion only if we practice it within the limits of Commandments 6 through 10 (against: murder, adultery, theft, false witness, and covetness).
I don't advocate anything (yet), but am just offering these ideas to stimulate more enlightened discussion.
Much agreed. They are also intellectual poison to higher thinking Cultures. Imo.
It's literally against our constitution.
Deport, any person that won’t accept American law must be deported. Sharia must be stopped. We are at a critical point and must remove them.
Amen to that.
When did she put Gladiator in her bio? ❤️😳. Love it!
Time for crusades 2.0. Crusades 1.0 was defense. Remember this people…they will kill you and I unless we submit, convert, pay tribute and give them our women and treasure.
Ain’t going to happen on my watch.
Yes, Islamic peoples need to go back to their own countries of origin because theybwill not be happy here as free people.
I've been thinking about this and the data centers fiasco. When PDJT stood up, after the assassination attempt, and said "fight, fight, fight", he wanted us all to fight for what we want. People are getting involved and that's what will make a difference, people that were never political or that have never fought against decisions that effect their lives so personally.
Always liked that woman.
👍
Give him credit for telling the truth and what their goal is. Now, what do we do about it? There's legal ways and if that fails there's alternatives.
I fear because our politicians, who were supposed to be the elected leaders - and turn back this incompatibility with our US Constitution/western civilization - HAVE FAILED us, our alternative is nearly here.
We definitely need certain laws that put up guardrails to preserve the founding fathers vision and keep the American way of life, no Sharia, no Socialism, no communism, no dual loyalties, no open borders, yes to tough on crime. If you’re a politician and start spewing this nonsense you’re immediately dismissed, we are becoming way too lax on allowing this nonsense.
We already have those laws, new ones won't help.
Anyone attempting to implement Sharia is attempting to overthrow the Constitution.
Additionally, start RICO investigations on every mosque in America. Muslims will attempt to strongarm people into believing their devil worshiping cult.
2 choices:
Get with the program...
Or GTFO
It's just that simple...
And send the enabling Americans with them.
And antithetical to the teachings of Yeshua.
Who opened the Gates of Toledo? Need to take care of that too.
Pork…. I got pork.. Come get some pork
These demons need to go back and stop taking land that don’t belong to them. GO HOME, why are they here on first place? They will kill of us Christians?
This has nothing to do with freedom of religion. it has to do with there can only be ONE Supreme Law of our Land, and that is the Constitution. You seem to be under the false impression that freedom of religion means accommodating the overthrow of our Constitutional Republic.
Our founders knew that Islam was not compatible with our form of government, and never intended to welcome them here. Anyone coming here was required, IS required, to fully renounce any allegiance to foreign powers, and swear allegiance to the Constitution. That is why there is supposed to be a waiting period, ideally 14 years, before someone could be eligible for citizenship, because they would have to prove by deed, not just by word, that they are truly wanting to become an American.
That is also why there was NEVER any validity to the anchor baby citizenship BS.
To be direct, Muslim's are not eligible to run for government office if they believe in Sharia Law. If they believe in Sharia, they cannot take an oath to the Constitution.
Sharia Law is 100% an enemy to the Constitution, as well as the principles upon which our Republic was established, period. https://nccs.net/blogs/articles/the-u-s-constitution-and-sharia-law
We do not need laws to ban Sharia. The Constitution is already a ban on it.
I agree, but I don't see that we have a position that can be argued within the framework of the Constitution. Mainly, what I mean, is that we have a desired outcome, but not a constitutional campaign position or legislative solution.
One possibility is to define advocacy of Sharia Law to be sedition, and any attempt to implement it as seditious conspiracy. That leaves the freedom of religion intact. This is somewhat parallel to the problem of Thuggee being accepted as a legitimate religion (of the death-goddess Kali), when a tenet of its practice is the ritual murder of travelers. I suppose another way to frame this is that we have freedom of religion only if we practice it within the limits of Commandments 6 through 10 (against: murder, adultery, theft, false witness, and covetness).
I don't advocate anything (yet), but am just offering these ideas to stimulate more enlightened discussion.