Richard Branson
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Note: The post is mistaken on one account: Allison Mack and Keith Raniere were not charged with "child sex trafficking" even though that's something that would get people's juices flowing. They were charged with regular (adult) sex trafficking, with Raniere also charged with "Sexual exploitation of a child" - he had a sexual relationship with an underage (15) girl.
Details matter.
PS. I'd be real happy to see some actual factual data here. Sure, Branson fits the model but data is important, facts are important, and just assuming "Yes, he's satanic and guilty AF" because of a few points is really shoddy analysis.
Make the assertions, or suppositions, but then research and find facts, instead of jumping to conclusions.
a) Necker Island can be rented. It was rented by NXIVM in 2007 and 2010, but there doesn't appear to be any evidence that Branson either organized or hosted the events (seminars, parties).
https://nypost.com/2018/04/23/sex-cult-partied-on-richard-bransons-private-island/
b) Sure, the Virgin logo looks like it could be a visual representation of being 'written with blood'. But in and of itself, its not evidence. Suspicious? Sure.
But in the case of Epstein, there has always been plenty of evidence pointing to his actual nature, but is this the case with Branson? (Rhetorical question. "No.") Also, Epstein is mentioned dozens of times in the Q drops, Branson not even once.
Real data and real digs are required. Let's not become lazy frogs, shall we?
👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆
He is also knighted, and has strong appearance of being a made man, which are always great reasons to give plenty of side-eye, alongside winning a Nobel Prize. I could totally buy this tweet as plausible, but a lot of verification is needed for a lot of big claims.
It’s perfectly fine to be prompted by tweets, but Step 2 should never be “blindly accept claims, emote about them. and move on”.
Thanks AE.
I would suspect if there was something really there with Branson, a good dig and solid research would turn it up.
I am mindful, however, of Donald J Trump. Many people simply wrote him off because he was another of "that class" aka billionaire capitalist.
I tend to think that the world is a bit like a big pool, and while we have the cabal system (bankers, etc) dominating and ruling over the pool, it's still a place in which God's principles operate, and so, when people apply operation of those principles, they can make something of themselves. Not everyone or everything is corrupted, either black or white.
From personal experience, I know that international organizations (esp. NGOs) can operate by trying to bring people into their sphere, to use them, gain prestige from them, or legitimacy. Think WEF "young leaders" program. Not everyone who took them at face value (and participated on some level) is a Schwab protegee or asset. Indeed, many of those included in the designation as 'Young Leaders" were included unilaterally by WEF, ostensibly to try to rope them in.
The Nobel Prize committee, Whoever controls the Royalty knighthoods, etc, would be the same. I do NOT believe they are innocent or that we can take them at face value (aka they are part of the corrupt establishment) but also, I cannot assume that everyone they attach to or assign 'awards' to is corrupt.
Plenty of side eye, BUT I'm also willing to entertain the possibility that Branson, for example, is simply what he appears to be. Some folks, however, would not. They look at Branson, even the data we have here (including what you've provided, which is salient) and simply conclude, "Told you. He's scum." without ever considering other possibilities.
Should be a banner at the top of GAW (jks, not really, but its true!)
So, so true. Thanks for saying it so well.
Extremely good points, all.
Yes.
Real data and real digs are required. Let's not become lazy frogs, shall we?
Yes.
I'm with you on that. I am wondering if he only got 3 years does that me he cooperated? Did he sing, give key names & evidence?
Mack was sentenced to 3 years. Raniere, apparently to 120 years. We can reasonably assume that Mack sang.
She seemed to admit wrong. People who are at least somewhat repentant usually want to see others rectified as well. No?
I'd think so.