Panel of Leftist Federal Judges Defy Supreme Court, Order Alabama to Reinstate its Rigged and Racially Gerrymandered Congressional Map
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
These people are STUPID!
Just give them the middle finger and ignore them. What are they going to do
These fucks believe they're untouchable.
But unreachable they are not....
Time to rip a new asshole on these traitors
Exposing the rot in the system.
Here's an update...
🚨Alabama has appealed this ruling to the United States Supreme Court.
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASsdnhO24/
https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2059315048665813353?s=20
This is the Dems playbook just like during the Scamdemic. Ignore the Constitution and the SCOTUS and carry on until further notice. I don't think this will work out from the commie faggots.
Cant the federal government march into their offices and arrest them for federal law violations?
And we just voted the other day. With some of the politicians running in the districts of concern were running in 2 districts. Like they were running in our district but says come the next voting they would be running in a different district when the map changes, so what would be the point of voting for them in our district. The voting was kind of confusing.
When SCOTUS did their ruling, it was too late for Alabama to change the ballots, so they left the people on the ballots that with current map would be in one district but if/when they change the map, they would end up running in a different district. So, if we voted for those people, then if they change the map, we wouldn't have had the chance to vote for another person who would actually be in our district this time around.
Maybe I should just start ignoring laws that I don't like...
That panel can not overturn the supreme courts decision. Ridiculous.
Tim P(T)ool and his retched smelly beanie might catch wind of this and start crowing CiViL wAr every five seconds again.
Time for a spanking
WoodChipper
Excellent... Step forward into the light, minions, and let everyone see who you are.
Both Manasco and Moorer were nominated by PDJT. Not sure if they're rinos or if they legitimately think that the timing of the constitutionally-sound redistricting is too "confusing" for the voters. (A repeated theme in some of the articles I've perused on this). The third judge, Marcus, appointed by Slick Willy, appears to be strongly pro-lgbxyz. You can go look at the bios for each on wiki, but the below sentence is from the "Notable cases" section of Marcus's bio.
"... In 2004, Marcus dissented when the court refused to rehear a case where the initial panel upheld a law banning LGBTQ couples from adopting children. ..."
There are decent, non-pedophile LGB+ parents who've adopted and raised their children, so not to denigrate them or paint them with a broad brush including pedos, but it's a notable leftist-oriented judicial stance and with so many horror stories coming out of abused adopted children in that community, it raises a red flag these days where activist leftist judges are considered. These activist leftist judges are currently releasing hardcore, violent criminals and pedophiles back out on the streets to reoffend and terrorize communities so one has to wonder if they care about citizens' rights and safety or if they're in line with marxist strategies to destroy the country from within.
.
From the below-linked article...
"... The judges, U.S. District Judge Anna Manasco, U.S. District Judge Terry Moorer, appointed by President Donald Trump; and U.S. Circuit Judge Stanley Marcus, appointed by former President Bill Clinton, wrote in the 79-page opinion that the state’s argument contradicted its arguments made in 2023, and said that its 2023 map “made it impossible not only to remediate the vote dilution we identified, but also to respect the longstanding community of interest the Legislature identified in Alabama’s Black Belt.” ..."
It looks to me like a clear violation of color-blind justice as they're attempting to make accomodations for a racial group (perhaps to the detriment of another racial group) where representation is concerned. If THIS is their argument, perhaps they should do some soul-searching and ask themselves if they'd be okay with a "White Belt". Blatantly racist, IMO. We have citizens of all races and they shouldn't be carved up into racial "districts". The demonrats just can't seem to relinquish their plantation mentality - keep 'em corralled in a geographic area so they're easier to "control"/manipulate with targeted, deceptive messaging.
.
https://alabamareflector.com/2026/05/26/federal-judges-block-alabamas-use-of-2023-congressional-map/
I didn’t know they could do this
This is interesting. All of my life since the (very) late 1950s the Democrats depended on judges to push through what they could not legislate, saying we must respect the judiciary. That meant what the Supreme Court said was sacrosanct and must be obeyed. Now the Democrats are in outright rebellion, ignoring the Supreme Court completely when it doesn't rule in a way they like. It really shows you what the Democratic Party really is–not what it has become–what it has been from the beginning, what it has been since the Civil War.
If lower court "justices" feel they can ignore the Supreme Court ruling, then the Supreme Court need to call those justices in and charge them with contempt.......