There's something afoot in Utah, I don't know if the Kirk shooting is meant to shed light on something. But if you look at the Bricks and Minifigs situation, it's the same judge. If you don't know about the bricks and Minifigs Lego story you it's about corruption Utah's Moromon population. A lot of goings on that's really unbelievable.
I copied this from Grok because im too lazy to write it myself.
Utah Fourth District Court Judge Tony F. Graf Jr. (also referred to as Tony Graf)—presided over (or is handling) both cases.f440e8,858745
Tyler Robinson case (the preliminary hearing for the man accused of murdering Charlie Kirk): Judge Tony Graf is overseeing the proceedings, including the recent preliminary hearing where he will decide (after briefs and arguments on Sept. 1) whether there is probable cause to advance to trial.7d7a11
PBS
Bricks and Minifigs case (the civil dispute/lawsuit involving Reckless Ben / Ben Schneider, BAM Franchising, related defamation/RICO claims, gag orders, and LEGO consignment controversy): Judge Tony Graf Jr. handled key aspects in Utah state court, including temporary restraining orders/gag orders and related motions. The civil case has since been removed to federal court.0ed24c
My personal policy is to take what any influencer says with the tiniest grain of salt. They all have to sensationalize to make their living.
It seems to me the most important part of the case against Tyler Robinson is that he believes he shot and killed Charlie Kirk. Reporting from MSM outlets cover his conversations with his gay boyfriend and family. His text with Lance Twiggs and the note he left under the keyboard are totally damning. And, apparently, he confessed to his parents and a family friend as well.
It’s good to be skeptical about influencers and the MSM. It’s necessary to sift through what they report. Just my opinion, but his boyfriend’s testimony, their text message, and note are probably enough to get a jury past reasonable doubt.
My personal policy is to take what any influencer says with the tiniest grain of salt. They all have to sensationalize to make their living.
100% agree fren. Peters and Posobiec should both fall under this scrutiny... as well as the MSM.
It seems to me the most important part of the case against Tyler Robinson is that he believes he shot and killed Charlie Kirk...
MK MONARCH/ULTRA (or whatever moniker the program goes by now) does seem to have a high success rate at convincing it's incredible crashtest dummies that they are the cause and effect of any given mission and/or psyop.
The problems with your statement is that none of that evidence is truly verifiable. The alleged handwritten note where 'Tyler admitted the crime' was set on fire and burned. Boyfriend Twiggs took a photo of it though(!), which means it cannot be DNA tested for validity, but can be used to accuse. How lucky is that? I don't think a handwriting analysis has been done to determine if Tyler in fact wrote it, or if Lance Twiggs or someone else did.
Second, the text messages are easily faked. A burner phone could be used to manufacture such a thing.
Tyler's alleged confession - His family members shared with two separate individuals who attended some of the early hearings that only 5% of the official story is true. They believe Tyler did not do it and say he never confessed. So which is true, I wonder?
Then we have the fact the Lance Twiggs family seems to have come into some money since Charlie's death. Lance was able to receive full immunity from prosecution, the family suddenly moved to TX, they bought a second home, formed an international 'Non-profit Family Charity', and formed two new LLCs and construction companies. We can't forget that Lance Twigg's DNA is all over the screw driver, the rifle and the towel.
Both can be true. Posobiec saw the court-presented surveillance videos showing the suspect on campus and moving into rooftop position before fleeing. Prosecutors stated no footage captured the precise instant of the shot itself.
The case combines that positioning video, timeline, DNA, and statements. No logical contradiction.
Under utah law, can failure to get a speedy trial lead to dismissal?
Yes, under Utah law, a failure to provide a speedy trial can lead to the mandatory dismissal of criminal charges.
State Constitutional Violation: Utah Rule of Criminal Procedure 25(b)(1) mandates that a judge "shall dismiss the information or indictment" if there is unreasonable or unconstitutional delay in bringing the defendant to trial.
Balancing Test: Courts determine if a delay is unconstitutional by applying the four-factor test from Barker v. Wingo: (1) length of the delay, (2) reason for the delay, (3) the defendant’s assertion of the right, and (4) prejudice to the defendant.
Federal vs. State Nuance: While a significant delay (e.g., over a year) may trigger analysis, recent Utah Supreme Court rulings like State of Utah v. Hintze (2025) clarify that delays attributable to state negligence alone do not automatically violate rights unless there is concrete evidence of actual prejudice.
Federal Cases: For federal charges in Utah, the Speedy Trial Act (18 U.S.C. § 3161) requires indictment within 30 days of arrest; violations generally result in mandatory dismissal, with the court deciding whether it is with or without prejudice based on the government's culpability.
Waiver: Defendants can waive this right, but courts generally advise against waiving it if the delay is caused by the government's negligence or failure to prosecute diligently.
There's something afoot in Utah, I don't know if the Kirk shooting is meant to shed light on something. But if you look at the Bricks and Minifigs situation, it's the same judge. If you don't know about the bricks and Minifigs Lego story you it's about corruption Utah's Moromon population. A lot of goings on that's really unbelievable.
I copied this from Grok because im too lazy to write it myself.
Utah Fourth District Court Judge Tony F. Graf Jr. (also referred to as Tony Graf)—presided over (or is handling) both cases.f440e8,858745
Tyler Robinson case (the preliminary hearing for the man accused of murdering Charlie Kirk): Judge Tony Graf is overseeing the proceedings, including the recent preliminary hearing where he will decide (after briefs and arguments on Sept. 1) whether there is probable cause to advance to trial.7d7a11 PBS Bricks and Minifigs case (the civil dispute/lawsuit involving Reckless Ben / Ben Schneider, BAM Franchising, related defamation/RICO claims, gag orders, and LEGO consignment controversy): Judge Tony Graf Jr. handled key aspects in Utah state court, including temporary restraining orders/gag orders and related motions. The civil case has since been removed to federal court.0ed24c
Some?
My personal policy is to take what any influencer says with the tiniest grain of salt. They all have to sensationalize to make their living.
It seems to me the most important part of the case against Tyler Robinson is that he believes he shot and killed Charlie Kirk. Reporting from MSM outlets cover his conversations with his gay boyfriend and family. His text with Lance Twiggs and the note he left under the keyboard are totally damning. And, apparently, he confessed to his parents and a family friend as well.
It’s good to be skeptical about influencers and the MSM. It’s necessary to sift through what they report. Just my opinion, but his boyfriend’s testimony, their text message, and note are probably enough to get a jury past reasonable doubt.
100% agree fren. Peters and Posobiec should both fall under this scrutiny... as well as the MSM.
MK MONARCH/ULTRA (or whatever moniker the program goes by now) does seem to have a high success rate at convincing it's incredible crashtest dummies that they are the cause and effect of any given mission and/or psyop.
17th updoot agrees!
The problems with your statement is that none of that evidence is truly verifiable. The alleged handwritten note where 'Tyler admitted the crime' was set on fire and burned. Boyfriend Twiggs took a photo of it though(!), which means it cannot be DNA tested for validity, but can be used to accuse. How lucky is that? I don't think a handwriting analysis has been done to determine if Tyler in fact wrote it, or if Lance Twiggs or someone else did.
Second, the text messages are easily faked. A burner phone could be used to manufacture such a thing.
Tyler's alleged confession - His family members shared with two separate individuals who attended some of the early hearings that only 5% of the official story is true. They believe Tyler did not do it and say he never confessed. So which is true, I wonder?
Then we have the fact the Lance Twiggs family seems to have come into some money since Charlie's death. Lance was able to receive full immunity from prosecution, the family suddenly moved to TX, they bought a second home, formed an international 'Non-profit Family Charity', and formed two new LLCs and construction companies. We can't forget that Lance Twigg's DNA is all over the screw driver, the rifle and the towel.
So many loose ends that don't line up!
Doesn't need to be deep state necessarily. Just exaggerated reporting.
According to grok
Under utah law, can failure to get a speedy trial lead to dismissal?
Yes, under Utah law, a failure to provide a speedy trial can lead to the mandatory dismissal of criminal charges.
No blood, if you get shot in the neck your heart pumps all your blood out in no time. Watch the video