3
289m 3 points ago +3 / -0

could these guys be replaced by AI? and is this article being released to soften the revelation that they already have been?

hang on, I just mean the job lol. not that he's been bodysnatched.

13
289m 13 points ago +13 / -0

is this related to the 'grim reaper' appearance?

8
289m 8 points ago +9 / -1

there are "plenty of videos" of lots of things that aren't real. all i'm saying is that fakery isn't impossible, and there's certainly motive to do so.

0
289m 0 points ago +2 / -2

BASHAR: FUTURE EARTH Channeled by Darryl Anka from "Without Expectations" 9-12-95

Question : Can you look into the future?

Bashar : There is no such thing as the future; there are an infinite number of probable realities. What we have the capacity to do, is look into the present and sense which probable reality may, at present, have the highest degree of momentum or inertia behind it -- and perhaps, be the most likely to manifest. But that can also change, and we may have the capability to tell you exactly what the percentage of likelihood is that it will change, or not. But there is no such thing as the future.

Q : Well, what I'm concerned about is....

B : There's that word again.

Q : Okay....I want to see peace on Earth.

B : Then create it.

Q : Is man doomed on this Earth? Are we going to destroy ourselves?

B : No, that is long since passed. One of the reasons you are now seeing the proliferation of so much violence is because you know it's safe to get it out of your system. Because you will no longer bring it to an ultimate doomsday ending. There may be a few isolated incidents and it is still likely that there may actually be, what you would call, nuclear usage in the Middle East, sometime around your '99 year, as an act of terrorism. But the idea is that even if that comes to pass it may also create a shock wave that will instantly galvanize all of you to change your ways, in recognizing what it could lead to, if you decide to go down that path.

But generally speaking, you will find that some time, give or take, about ten of your years ago -- maybe fifteen at the outside, you actually all collectively already decided that you would not annihilate yourselves. But you also recognized that many of you may have to go through trials by fire in a variety of ways, or not, in order to allow yourself to bring to the surface all the ideas of the dark side of your consciousness. So that in bringing it all out in the open, on the table as you say, you have the freedom to choose what you prefer and what you don't. And make a choice about what you want your world to be, and whether or not each of you individually is willing to take responsibility for creating the peace you want, or if you're going to continue to give your power away and assume someone else will do it for you, some day, some where, some how. But you are now in the eye of the hurricane -- right at the point of the fulcrum, each and every one of you -- each and every one of you impacts all of you. The more you are your total Self, the easier it is for all of you to be your total Selves, and allow the whole picture to integrate peacefully, harmoniously.

One of the reasons we are even capable of having these conversations with your species at this time is just because you have chosen to not annihilate yourselves. Had you done so there would be no point to this conversation and we would be elsewhere. But we know that the most likely energy, although there are a variety of ways that your planet can still get there, the most likely probable reality is that your world, in and around your year of 2011- 2013, will finally begin, after having gone through certain transitions, to lay down the foundations of a flow of harmonics on your planet.

And by the year of 2037 the Earth will most likely become a member of the Association of Worlds, to which we belong. That is generally how we understand your energy to be unfolding and why we are communicating with your species at this time, because we are communicating with the evolving Earth that is heading in that direction generally. Does that make sense to you?

Q : Yes, very much. You've answered my question. Thank you.

14
289m 14 points ago +15 / -1

i'm hesitant to believe this. only because it would be a good false flag to frame antivaxxers as scammers or insane.

5
289m 5 points ago +5 / -0

hasn't the US "lost" like 10 trillion? as in, whoops, sorry, we misplaced that?

1
289m 1 point ago +1 / -0

most lefties don't support lots of that. the middle ground is disappearing as they flock to the right, but its still there. those that do come to the right will still be seen as the left, everything being relative. so hopefully once the satanic far left is gone we can get back to fighting over weed and rock music.

13
289m 13 points ago +14 / -1

i think this forum will largely recommend against chemo. myself included. there are so many better ways

1
289m 1 point ago +1 / -0

hey, if the help you receive from God isn't good enough for you, go ahead and reject it. I'm not sure why you think you deserve better than our military's best effort though. and I don't know what other help you think you're gonna get. good luck though!

1
289m 1 point ago +1 / -0

there's nothing revelatory in this inane wall of text. usually when we post something from a conflicting perspective, we give a hint as to why. otherwise we'll just go in mind numbing loops posting whatever crap the msm says about us.

am i missing something? is there something noteworthy in this trash article?

2
289m 2 points ago +2 / -0

its just that this is obviously a deranged far-left hitpiece. its chock full of nonsense. i dont see the value in posting it here.

1
289m 1 point ago +1 / -0

"you can only protest effectively when you love the person whose ideas you are protesting against as much as you love yourself."

  • ram das, 'be here now'
1
289m 1 point ago +2 / -1

yeah yeah. and any god that allows suffering must be evil. please. we've already received a lot of help in this war. if it were up to most of us, we would have chosen to skip covid and the whole last four years. but we know that patriots are in control. we know its not going to be clean. we know it had to be that way. there are necessary parts to this process, and most of us on the ground have no idea what they are. the proper amount of civilian casualties in any military operation is 'as few as possible'. if we wanted it to be 'none', we shouldn't have let our republic degrade to the point where the military is the only way.

4
289m 4 points ago +4 / -0

im pretty sure they meant to say 'invest'

1
289m 1 point ago +1 / -0

okay I missed that. if the idea is that that county is a military target... while a detonation may be allowed to occur, war will not. its very unlikely the target will be chosen for that kind of military significance imo. there will be no nuclear war.

2
289m 2 points ago +2 / -0

what? nuclear fallout is NOT the same as nuclear winter. nuclear fallout has been experienced by many inhabited places.

yes, the size of explosion depends on the device. yes, any amount of nuclear damage is a tragedy. but we have endured tragedy. losing a town does not mean losing the continent.
a boom on our soil doesn't mean we give up. and I doubt even a single detonation of that size will be allowed to take place.

i was an atheist for a long time. its not about beginning to believe in the concept of God, but rather beginning to understand it. there are no accidents within God. and everything is within God.

1
289m 1 point ago +1 / -0

i mean the damage would be limited. technically yes, radioactive particles would drift for miles. we've handled that before. the cleanup of earth will take unknown methods anyways. that's okay. even one detonation, were that to happen, is a far cry from a nuclear winter. we will perservere. God is in control.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›