just gonna drop these gems again. such interesting articles on the guardian..
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/nov/24/false-memories-abuse-convict-innocent
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/nov/18/satanic-child-abuse-false-memories-scotland
you might think you're being realistic. but you're just dooming.
it wasn't my intention for this post to get taken down. and i don't totally remember the content.
but in general i recommend calling out possible issues from a neutral position, or presenting solutions. its one thing to be incapable of fully trusting the plan, but you can't go all chicken little on everyone, especially if you're not focused on a topic. we all know there are challenges. not one of us is doing nothing. we all have a role to play.... and yours is not to warn us that our elections have been compromised. we know.
if you want to talk plan b, ask on p.win with the glowies and the rest of the doomers.
learn to have faith.
I think its clear that they struggle to control RFK, even if they do prefer him to Trump.
Even if they are willing to cheat just as hard to install him on the basis that he isn't Trump, the fact that they have to fight to install someone they can't control is quite telling, and must be for them as well. everybody is seeing that NCSWIC
no need to retake the term liberal. people who do whatever they feel like at the expense of others (liberal) are people who require a large (liberal) government.
as opposed to those who require and believe in only a conservative amount of government. conservatives are often conflated with traditionalists, because traditions must be sustainable enough to be passed down through generations, so they are used to governing themselves.
i long for the day we no longer have to be suspicious of basic ass shit like spirals, rainbows, pizza, and butterflies