0
Anon_in_danger 0 points ago +1 / -1

Based on that argument and your source the First 9 presidents of the USA were not eligible to be US presidents. They were all born before independence in 1776 and constitution adoption in 1789. Linking a Wordpress website doesn’t give legitimacy anyone can make a Wordpress website and spit a bunch of nonsense.

3
Anon_in_danger 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s your choice and that’s the beauty of our 1st amendment, I hope I type this in time before I get on that list.

Did you know that the first 9 presidents were not natural born citizens? They were all born in British America before the independence in 1776 and WAY before the constitution was adopted?

did you also know President Donald J Trump is just like Obama? One of his parents wasn’t a natural born citizen???

Obamas legitimacy is questioned for not being born on US soil aka Natural Born.

Both presidents have at least one immigrant parent.

President Donald J Trump’s mother was NOT a natural born citizen.

Born in Scotland 1912 migrated to the USA in 1930 married Fred Trump 1936 became NATURALIZED US citizen in 1942 that’s 4 years before our president’s birth.

Are you sure you want to insist on Presidents parents must BOTH be natural born citizens?

President Donald Trump is a natural born citizen because he was born on US soil his mother is not natural born.

1
Anon_in_danger 1 point ago +1 / -0

In France citizenship is obtained by 3 different ways:

  • Jus sanguinis, blood relation from either parent.
  • married to French citizen for 5 years (6 years if you were living outside of france)
  • LEGAL resident in france for 5 years.

All the above will grant you french citizenship and allows you to become president.

If both parents were not French gave birth in france the child WON’T become a french citizen. The child must reside for at least 5 years and be 18 years old when applying. Europe has different laws than USA, you can become resident and get government benefits even if you were not a french citizen, you just need to be in the country LEGALLY.

3
Anon_in_danger 3 points ago +3 / -0

The farmers wrote the constitution in 1787, 9 of the 13 states ratified it 1788, it went into effect 1789. The united states declared independence in 1776. That’s 11 years before the idea of the constitution and 13 years before the constitution became effective. In the years before the adoption of the constitution all citizens became US citizens no application for citizenship no oath of allegiance nothing simply for being a citizen of that colony before declaration of independence.

citizenship back then was obtained two ways:

  • “Jus soli” (right of the soil) aka birthright citizenship.
  • naturalization.

Naturalization process was open to any free white person with two years of residency and good conduct. The person would go to any court of record files declaration of intention “first papers” then three years later files petition for naturalization “second papers”.

When the farmers wrote the constitution they put the natural born condition “birthright citizens” to protect the nation from foreign influence of naturalized citizens mentioned above.

Also don’t forget when the farmers adopted the constitution it was ONLY free white men who became citizens until the 14th amendment 1868 (79 years later).

Your pizza example is flawed, pizza can be square or rectangle shaped it’s called “Sicilian pizza”. Pizza marinara is also a pizza without cheese.

They are all pizza from Italy that’s something not every 2 year old knows.

1
Anon_in_danger 1 point ago +1 / -0

A person is subject of the jurisdiction he’s currently in unless he’s a diplomat or an invader.

It has nothing to do with citizenship.

If that frenchman is not a diplomat and committed a crime while visiting the USA he’s subject to the jurisdiction of the USA. If France wanted him the USA will send him to France because they have an extradition treaty that’s it.

If he was a Chinaman he’s subject of the jurisdiction he’s in (USA), even if china wanted him USA will not send him to China because they don’t have an extradition treaty.

3
Anon_in_danger 3 points ago +3 / -0

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.

subject to the jurisdiction means subject to the laws of the country. Someone on a tourist or student visa is still subject to the laws of the USA because they can be arrested and prosecuted for breaking the law then deported after serving their sentences.

Only diplomats “Under Diplomatic Immunity” And invaders are not subject to the jurisdiction. illegal immigrants fall under the invaders category.

2
Anon_in_danger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not if they entered the country legally, having any type of visa means you’re subject to the jurisdiction of that country while you are visiting.

3
Anon_in_danger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump said anyone one born to illegal immigrants. If the immigration was legal then the baby born will be a US citizen.

9
Anon_in_danger 9 points ago +9 / -0

Sorry to be the party pooper, that’s not true.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

A natural born citizen refers to someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth, and did not need to go through a naturalization proceeding later in life. Under the 14th Amendment's Naturalization Clause and the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US.

Has nothing to do with parents because at time of writing the constitution not everyone’s parents were US citizens. There have been Anchor babies since the founding of the USA.

1
Anon_in_danger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I stand corrected, thank you. The president picks and that pick would need both house and senate simple majority to confirm. It’s a tough path for the Democrats either way. The road ahead is filled with bumps for them.

6
Anon_in_danger 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you can’t run you can’t serve, if Joe Out of presidency Kamala installed as president she’s no longer the senate vote tie breaker and we get a taste of her shit show disastrous presidency for couple of months to wake more normies. else Joe stays president Joe runs elections loses anyways.

-1
Anon_in_danger -1 points ago +1 / -2

Have respect for the dead please, we can’t be like the other side. We have to be the best we can be in the name of UNITY. A week ago it would’ve been our president Donald J Trump that we’re mourning if it wasn’t for the grace of GOD. She’s dead and only GOD almighty CAN and WILL JUDGE her. Remember MAGA movement and Q psyop is not for half of America it’s for ALL of America.

2
Anon_in_danger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could it be related to Q’s last drop about what’s coded in our DNA and who put it there? and why? And why there’s a war for our DNA?

2
Anon_in_danger 2 points ago +2 / -0

JD VANCE IS A USMC OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM COMBAT VETERAN.

Once a marine ALWAYS A MARINE.

I trust President Trumps pick and I believe in JD Vance and that Military is the only way.

JD Vance is loyal to the Flag and to the republic.