Relax ...First OP's comment has the entire article quoted

Theyll blame it on the commie coof and privacy.

I prefer Cum'Allah

Theres a better one of her paying respects to John McCain, at the memorial to the AA gunners that shot him down. It had a little picture of McCain with his hands in the air.

Military Members:

1. Seek exemption if possible. This is a short-run solution until the mandate can actually be overturned.

2. The FDA-approved vax is COMINARTY. This still hasnt been produced yet to the military. Refuse any other vax if its not labelled, because COMINARTY is a legally separate entity from the EUA Pfizer Vax out there.

3. No matter what, don't ever sign the legal waiver! There's still a possibility that we can hold Pfizer accountable if its the FDA-approved COMINARTY. EUA drugs require your consent for legal waiver to any suit for damages.

4. Worst case, take the OTH discharge.

In all things, make them the ones that are doing things. Never let them coerce you into doing something you don't want. Above all, have faith that things will turn out well.

It does fit their narrative?

He saved no life, not even his own. Shouldve gone with the Negligent Discharge defense.....

The OTH discharge means you lose all Veterans Benefits like the GI bill I worked for. Also, there's a ban on federal employment. Some potential employers may care about the differences in discharge, but most dont.

26.....out of 2.2 million

Its Orher Than Honourable since they treat it as disobeying a direct order. You can dispute to upgrade it 1 year after.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/

TLDR: the FDA did both in approving Cominarty and extending the EUA. The vax if produced and labelled and distributed as Cominarty is FDA approved. Without it, it is EUA only.

Under Cominarty, Pfizer can be held liable for death or adverse reactions. Under the EUA vax, they may not. As such, there seems to be strong legal incentive for Pfizer to NOT produce or distribute Cominarty. This might explain the confusing rationale of approval, and the EUA extension. Hope this clears things up a little. Bottom line, we have Schrodinger's Vaccine that is both FDA approved and unapproved, depending on labeling.

Well before you go there.....pretty much all suits so far have been thrown out or lost. Unless we get ahold of something that shows explicitly this is the case, the willful misconduct route goes nowhere legally.

Govern me harder daddy!

Same here. Dont know how to refuse it without going the Other-Than-Honourable discharge route.

Also like every vegan food, it has tons of sodium in it to make up for the taste.

Biologics License Application. Fancy form filled out by pharma to request permission to sell their drug. Upon approving, the FDA formally grants FDA-approval and the drug is now an FDA-approved drug.

Here's a rundown fren. Similar arguments, just in written form. No account or paywall either.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/

Great Analysis by lawyer and a champion of populists, Robert Barnes of the BLA issued by the FDA. If you're not on locals, here's a rundown:

1. Pfizer jab IS approved as COMIRNATY

2. Simultaneously, EUA was extended for the Pfizer jab

3. Current batches are NOT COMINARTY and NOT approved by FDA and still fall under EUA. The BLA ONLY APPLIES TO COMINARTY!

4. The provision for the BLA is for future production of COMINARTY, which may not even get produced anytime soon.

5. The FDA insisted that there be more testing, with a schedule of reports in the 2023-2025 timeline.

6. In the rush to approval, the FDA bypassed its own vaccine advisory board and declared the vax safe.

7. Pfizer only filed for COMINARTY's BLA around May. With approval in August, that makes a 3 month (!) approval process. Ridiculously short.

8. Until COMINARTY actually hits the shelves, all of Pfizers vaccines are EUA-only. This includes any batch that ISNT properly labelled as COMINARTY and following the labelling they put up in the BLA (includes ingredient list, dosage, etc.)

9. Barnes has a follow-up video on why the FDA-approved vax may not even get produced anytime soon. Reason being that they probably want full immunity, which they lose by producing COMINARTY. Link: https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/992345/why-that-fda-approved-vaccine-aint-coming-anytime-soon

10. The FDA was extremely scummy with the language used. The EUA extension is equivocated several times. Legally, they extended the EUA to cover the vax as a whole. They obfuscated this by adding in the language of Under-12's into it. The EUA is extended for all uses for COVID for the Pfizer jab.

11. It looks like the reason for extending the EUA for the Pfizer shot, is to cover Pfizer, as they might not actually produce COMINARTY anytime soon. (See point #9)

12. The FDA was extremely scummy. The same person that wrote this memo wrote the response to the Children's Health Defense lawsuit put forth by Robert F. Kennedy & Barnes. Its like they tried to respond and pre-empt that suit over an EUA mandate.

So in short, the FDA went through extremely sketchy measures to override their own protocols in BOTH extending the EUA AND approving the BLA for the Pfizer vax. Only COMINARTY is FDA-approved, and it this does NOT apply retroactively to current batches of the vax. Also, Pfizer may not even produce COMINARTY for a while, meaning current vax's are all EUA.

This is pretty much a sham cover for vax mandates by the Administration of Resident Zhou Bi-Deng under the pretext of having an FDA-approved vax, without actually even producing said vax. Rather sneaky.

Hope this helps clear up all the confusing language over the Pfizer approval letter.

They needed to bail out the Biden admin from itd failings.

Only one more point to bring up: COMINARTY and the FDA approval only applies to the new batches produced after the FDA approval. Current batches in circulation cannot simply be relabelled. Expect to see a short lagtime for any mandate, as they need to cycle out the EUA batches.

Do not take this as legal advice. Legally we have never tried this before.

F F F F F F FFFFFFFFF.....

Idiots keep voting for this at the local level.... How does Australia end up with a decently based Federal Government, and utterly cucked local & separatist governments?

FBI

Not when you purchase the support for it from Chynah!

Yup, China had no rebuilding period at all. The wartime army of China was barely able to equip 30 divisions, due to lacking any port. Ironically enough,if the war had lasted till 1946, the ROC may have had a better chance with more supplies and lend lease from the USA.

Enter the USSR giving equipment to the commies and Manchuria. Manchuria was the most industrial region, and modern part of China. It avoided most of the ill effects of the long war, and the Nationalists had to expend a lot of capital to invade. By 47, they succeeded, at the cost of burning through the entire army's stockpiles of everything.