1
BrotherAmerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

Though your point is worth studying, it is obviously wrong to always uphold every law, every time. For his case in particular, the COVID mandates were passed illegally, because they are in opposition to the Constitution of the United States. They are therefore not laws at all. In fact, most of what the federal government (and probably many state governments) does is illegal.

Laws are made by men. Men are corruptible. In trying to follow the example of an uncorrupted Man, it is impossible for us to always do good and also always be "legal". I bitterly hate law enforcement because I trust them to uphold evil and illegal laws. If I knew that most of them would usually look the other way when appropriate, they would be much easier to tolerate. I can shoot and kill looters, arsonists, kidnappers, and rapists. Shooting and killing police guarding CPS as they try to steal your children on an "anonymous" lie with a warrant gained without probable cause only leads to more police.

2
BrotherAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

That sounds awfully permanent. I'd be more on board if "child molestation" were always clear cut. A rebellious and dishonest seventeen year old girl with a fake I.D. could ruin a man's life.

Haha by Qtoad
4
BrotherAmerica 4 points ago +4 / -0

I just can't even this whole bluesky thing. They form and rule twitter, happy to silence whoever they want. Truth launches and they decry it as biased. Twitter becomes X and they complain that it's biased, when there's still plenty of leftism going on, they just toned down the unequal privileges and bots. So they just make a new Twitter with all their bots and inorganic pushing on Reddit, and hope it works again?

2
BrotherAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

My mother was a labor and delivery nurse in Arizona who despaired at how many women would come over the border, just in time to go into labor and have the child in the United States. As an example of how real TDS is, she promptly and completely reversed her position sometimes around January, 2016.

2
BrotherAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

... Sometimes a seventeen is just the whole integer step greater than sixteen. I don't think Q has anything to do with a guy saying something vague about the brain.

6
BrotherAmerica 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't see where they "betrayed party values". Making use of pawns in the moment and tossing them aside is what Democrats have done with various minorities and other arbitrarily separated classes for decades, what makes staffers any different?

2
BrotherAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

Leftists: "Elon supported Trump, it's not fair! Everyone likes Elon!"

In the next breath: "Blue sky is so awesome! Everyone is leaving X because Elon is an idiot!"

3
BrotherAmerica 3 points ago +3 / -0

The answer is no, no they won't. They want tyranny even when it hurts them, because they care more about stopping others from being free. Freedom leads to inequality, their ultimate sin.

2
BrotherAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not seeing that second picture yet. The ones I know are still just shouting that he's Hitler.

1
BrotherAmerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, half or more of those don't look so bad. Shopping? Mail? School, maybe, with a VM and a VPN. Work, if my wife and children would stop pretending I'm available during work for home opportunities. Relax, absolutely. Movie, because the children are using the large one in front of the couch. Bills, yes.

5
BrotherAmerica 5 points ago +5 / -0

It grates me when an occasion nal speaker at church will address us as "sisters and brothers.". The term is "brothers and sisters", that's just how English is. Putting "sisters" first is a conscious decision and therefore distracting. If you want to acknowledge the females first, you say "ladies and gentlemen".

Imagine if someone ever opened with "gentlemen and ladies". Think about it... Right? "Brothers and sisters", "men and women".

4
BrotherAmerica 4 points ago +4 / -0

I read the following in the Bible: "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." (Matthew 5:48)

"He said unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep." (John 21:17)

<A lot of James chapter 2>

We are saved by Grace. Faith in Christ isn't to be content with "being saved", it is to become like Him. That can't be done through Grace alone, that requires us to be willing to put in some effort, like becoming anything else in life does. The idea that God would "save" one who processes faith without worms and damn an otherwise righteous man who knows not His name is contrary to a Godly nature.

1
BrotherAmerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

If any of them are corrupt or compromised, it instills doubt in any ruling that could have been impacted by it. We have a remarkable number of 4/5 splits and we know that more than one of them is corrupt or compromised.

3
BrotherAmerica 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't believe it! Google lied about something involving something they do with information??

2
BrotherAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

We don't need one more department, we need two dozen fewer.

2
BrotherAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

Planet Fitness isn't a gym, it's a social club that banks on you not using your membership often to make money. They're like leftists, billing themselves as non-judgmental while completely shunning those who actually work and exert themselves to become stronger and fitter. You are literally not allowed to train so hard that you grunt or yell, or you are kicked out. You don't become better there, you go through idle motions while patting yourself on the back and pretending that you're doing something good.

1
BrotherAmerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

Numbers are the most broken power... In Final Fantasy Tactics. In real life, well, sometimes.

3
BrotherAmerica 3 points ago +3 / -0

I dig it, but you don't have to be Christian to oppose sexual confusion. There is so much wrong with it and the push for it, you don't even need a religious reason to oppose it.

0
BrotherAmerica 0 points ago +1 / -1

This. It's been too long. There is no more use for "this is true" or "this is happening". It needs to lead to something to do, not more "things are really this way if you do sorcery with social media post numbers and timing!" And stupid crap that has nothing to do with anything like Biden's dog biting someone, or a news outlet/politician saying something we already know it/she would say, or someone having to pay legal fees in an environment in which everyone is always taking everyone else to court.

4
BrotherAmerica 4 points ago +4 / -0

The only current solution is to use local models. There is no getting around that right now. They're not as powerful, but you can get some pretty serviceable results with good hardware. Stop paying money and attention to their control mechanisms.

Just as a starting point, if you want pictures, look up EasyDiffusion and have a graphics card with really good VRAM handy.

2
BrotherAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. People already thanked me for my service when they paid for my degree and a couple of babies, and over half of the people in my basic training flight already received your thanks when they came in to trash talk you, your culture, your country, and their own military while you paid for their degrees while they forgo their own babies to teach incorrect things to yours.

2
BrotherAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't understand the downvotes, I made the same observation. His answer started out much the same way the reporter's question did in terms of being ill-defined. Thankfully the reporter was mentally and verbally slow enough not to jump on it, and this man then elaborated with a concrete example of what he means.

view more: Next ›