In my search for the transcript of the full 03 March 2014 DHS Special Agent Todd Hyman Deposition, I hit on (and posted in the post text above) a link to the full docket of
United States v. Prevezon Holdings Ltd. (1:13-cv-06326)
of which the Todd Hyman deposition is a part.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4352673/united-states-v-prevezon-holdings-ltd/?page=4
- do not advise anyone not well versed in the in Bill Browder's manipulation of (a euphemism for bribing) the legislative process of the U.S. Congress (House and Senate) and the US State Department in the passage of The Magnitsky Act.
I am well versed and in it and as prepared as I think I am... its pretty much like this...
https://youtu.be/VjxH6tYUp34?t=423
- That said, as I've said before, there is treasure in these lawsuit back and forth motions, letters, emails and filings as the the lawyers and judges go all KTF (kabuki tango foxtrot) for years... and then never go to trial.
What's up with that?
- Let me get this one exhibit out there for you to read the first page of (first after the Exhibit 53 cover page)...
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.417238/gov.uscourts.nysd.417238.422.20.pdf
The man Bill Browder left out to dry, Sergey Magnitsky, was born in Odessa, Ukraine.
- I have a ton of work to do on this, but I can already tell it is a gold mine as far as filling the gaps of knowledge about the Browder fronted financial crimes in Russia (he arrived in 1996) to do there what Mitt Romney did here with Bain Capital.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bain_Capital
When Mitt Romney Came To Town
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92i6rk0LT7Y (28 minutes)
- I think I now have the material I need to document and support a theory I have had all along that Prevezon fought the lawsuit brought by then US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara up the point when it had squeezed, under oath, all the information it needed out of whoever they could, and then just settled the case.
Browder was just a puppet, playing the role of Christopher Steele by seeding false data into the US legal system, which is also complicit the entire time in accepting the faked data and bringing a lawsuit against Prevezon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preet_Bharara
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preet_Bharara#Russian_money_laundering_fraud
It was all just more deep state smoke and mirror manipulation of the legal system to cover its own crimes - as was Browder feeding faked information to Sen. Cardin and Sen. McCain who sponsored and spearheaded passage of The Magnitsky Act with the sole aim of sanctioning select Russian officials investigating Browder and his Russian, American, and Israeli criminal syndicate bosses..
Prevezon went to court just in order to force Browder into a deposition (6 hours, linked again below and already above in the post text) exposing the entire Sergey Magnitsky narrative a fraud and, in effect, a scam and a cover up of the financial crimes Browder was the front man and cut out for..
What looked like a financial loss for Prevezon in settling the case (see link below), which all the while was acting as a second in the legal duel between the international criminal syndicate Bill Browder is a front man and patsy for and the Russian government under President Putin. It was and is a huge win in the Lawfare Wars.
15 April 2015 Browder Deposition (dodged process servers for two years)
https://youtu.be/kpy9uidJi80 (6+ hours)
Full transcript https://jimmysllama.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Browder-Deposition-04-15-2015.pdf
Prevezon Settlement Article
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-v-prevezon-case-settlement-russia-money-laundering-2017-5?op=1
- I recommend not doing any digging unless you have read War and Peace and were able to keep the names of all the characters straight as you plowed through it. Reading the filings and motions is a lot like that. Those who have tried, keeping the names straight in War and Peace, please chime in.
For your consideration, have been commenting on this subject as well, and missed your previous post.
Link to statements, speeches (linked and transcribed) and interviews, as well as my non-lawyer analysis. There is a lot of reference material you may or may not have seen, if any of it is helpful to please feel free to use it without attribution. I think you will find some nuances about the Montgomery 2020 election data that will be informative to your analysis (pay close attention to what Mary Fanning, conduit for the data from Montgomery to Lindell on 09 January 2021, says about the data. Be sitting down when you find it.
Also, note mentions about Lindell's lead attorney, Kurt Olsen and 09 January 2021.
Not all of the links are exclusively directly related to protective order issue, some are tangential and will in time come into play.
These are just the most recent digs on Lindell / Montgomery / PCAP data
All of the links contain some reference to Lindell's legal matters.
WWG1WGA
https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6JNKvM9/-10-identify-all-circumstances-s/
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JnYo0CDw/this-is-huge-ncswic-dennis-montg/
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JnYp9xn5/live-trump-rally-rsbn-stream--mi/
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JnBH1unC/phillipsengelbrecht-having-opene/
This is the beginning of the end battles of the Forever Lawfare Wars. When they are over comes the duty of establishing and guarding the Peace.
In court, under oath, one by one, the agents of influence rat each other out (Robby Mook fingers Hillary Clinton). Its either tell the truth or its jail for perjury down the line. The only lies allowed left to stand are the ones that can be used to trap those the next level up.
Durham does not care what they did. Half of them are going to defenestrate themselves, be the victim of random jugulation, or die in the near future of either an automobile crash, a random mugging (aka Seth Rich) or other 'natural causes.' Going to jail is immaterial. Even Bill and Hillary Clinton and Obama are just low hanging fruit at this point. Remember that these people will not be able to walk down the street when all is said and done.
There has to be a Sun Tsu quote about losing battles during early contact with the enemy in order to determine strengths and weaknesses, prepare the psychological attack that precedes kinetic engagement, and positioning your enemy for the battle that will end and win the war.
These initial trials are for educational and conditioning purposes for us, for the hoi polloi, to prepare us for the shock of the final battle and the world that will be after. Lawfare is a world-wide "legal" protection racket run by thugs and enforced by assassins.
We've been asleep all our lives and have to be woken up slowly and carefully, one step at a time, so that we can face the nightmare which is our reality.
The only thing we must do now is to https://youtu.be/D6_ZC6BywXs (first 3 seconds)
https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/05/25/sussmann-trial-mook-outs-clinton-as-russiagate-shot-caller/
Thanks for this...
The linked document, filed in combined court (stamp in upper right), Grand Jury Case 21CR100, (if I understand correctly) is the Grand Jury Indictment from March 08, 2021. I am assuming that this case has been moved / filed as a criminal proceeding and assigned to a judge.
This section of the indictment containing the Description of Criminal Conduct is going to be a major revelation of deep state corruption and criminal influence in Colorado: page 12, paragraphs 6, 7 & 8 - (all portions in parentheses I have added for clarity or background information purposes):
Begin copy from indictment:
In early August 2021, SOS employees learned that images of the Mesa County election management systems and related passwords were on the internet. On or about August 9, 2021, (The day before the start of Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium held at the Veterans Center in Sioux Falls, SD.) the SOS issued Election Order 2021-01, which ordered Tina Peters and the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder's Office to provide access to the SOS for an inspection. The SOS also ordered the Mesa Clerk and Recorder to immediately produce to the SOS staff any documents of written or verbal communications, including but not limited to, emails, texts, messaging programs, social media, direct messaging, voice mails, emails and call logs by and with Mesa County Clerk and Recorder of staff or designee regarding DVS (Dominion Voting System) machines or the trusted build process. Furthermore, the SOS directed the Mesa Clerk to provide communications that contain or reflect or reference any images, videos, actions, or recordings arising from or related to the trusted build installation conducted on May 25, 2021. The SOS also directed the Clerk to produce documents showing the dates of employment and the job descriptions for all representatives of the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder's office who participated in the trusted build on May 25, 2021. Ms. Peters and Ms. Knisley did not comply with all of the requests or directives contained in the Election Order 2021.
On August 10, 2021 (Day 1 of Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium) on the morning of which Tina Peters and the before and after forensic images of the Mesa County DVS were transported by Lindell's private aircraft from Grand Forks, Colorado (Mesa County) to Sioux Falls, SD.) Belinda Knisley stated in an interview that Tina Peters directed her to turn off the cameras in May 2021. Belinda Knisley also said that the Clerk's office considered hiring Gerald Wood but had decided against hiring him.
On August 12, 2021 (Day 3 of Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium, the day after Tina Peters and the before-and-after forensic images of the Mesa County DVS were transported by Lindell's private aircraft from Grand Forks, Colorado (Mesa County) to Sioux Falls, SD and the day of the presentation of the Peter's DVS data to the attendees of the Cyber Symposium and live via internet remote broadcast by the Lindell communications platform frankspeech.com), the SOS ordered that Mesa County was prohibited from using their elections equipment in future elections. The order was based in part because the SOS could not confirm the BIOS settings were not accessed after the trusted build process (conducted by Dominion technicians under the supervision of SOS personnel on May 25, 2021 and out of sight and supervision of the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder and staff - locked out) and could not establish confidence in the integrity of security of the Mesa County elections equipment.
End copy from indictment.
I also see Counts 1 - 5 is that Attempt To Influence A Public Servant, C.R.S. 18-8-306 (F4) 20451 charge that was one of the charges the police, during the Eric Coomer arrest, were going to charge him with unless he confessed being the driver of his truck during the accident (ran a stop sign, hit and damaged a building, left the scene of an accident, lying to a police officer about being the driver).
I am searching for access to the District Court, Mesa County, Colorado docket to be able to track developments in this case. Anyone who can assist would be much appreciated. There is no District Court Case Number on the copy of the indictment in the link AllowMeToExplain has provided.
Forgot to answer your question about adoptions. When the Magnitsky Act was passed, Putin halted all adoptions of Russian children by Americans, and as similar acts were passed in other, mostly European countries, he cut off adoptions there as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dima_Yakovlev_Law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnitsky_Act#Actions_by_the_Russian_government
There is a great backstory (part fact, part conjecture) to the Trump Tower meeting. If you're interested I'll put it on the list of topics to post about.
My bad... change
The rest is Magnitsly Act (Russia Sanctions - Act I) history and another long post.
to
The rest is Magnitsky Act history aka Russia Sanctions - Act I.
Russia Sanctions - Act II (Trump campaign and election) includes the public poisoning of the well of US Russia relations by the following plot developments during the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax narrative storyline:
29 December 2016 - 35 Russians declared Persona Non Grata...
Given 3 days to leave the country...
2 Diplomatic facilities closed
Blaming Russia for hacking the DNC
Blaming Russia for hacking the 2016 election
Claiming the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to manipulate voters
The Logan Act frame of Gen Flynn over the Kislyak phone call
Norman_F_Dixon did yoeman's work on the finer details of the 16 July 2018 Trump Putin Press Conference and the MSM / Political (McCain and Cardin) apoplexy over the Browder subtext. Their attempt to spin the narrative to draw attention away from Puitn dropping the Browder MOAB was classic.
See link for exhaustive description.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12j08ThCvy/birthday-drop-doitq-filename--di/
Browder is getting raked over the coals in Europe, they are on to him and his Human Rights scam con.
You would probably be interested in watching The Magnitsky Act: Behind the scenes. This is an incredibly well made and powerful expose of Bill Browder.
Banned internationally, Devin Nunes (Kash Patel) organized a showing of The Magnitsky Act: Behind The Scenes in Washington, DC at the Newseum for Republican members of Congress. What the attendees learned is how easy it is to pull the wool over their eyes both individually and as collective legislative body. A lot of firebrands were lit that day... Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz... making even more sense now?
Go to https://magnitskyact.com/ for a description of and distribution history since making the film. If interested I recommend viewing. It will shed a lot of light on a lot hidden history directly relevant to comprehending the absolute rot at the core of our government and of other governments.
The link above first goes to the former documentary film hosting site where the film finally was able to stay up and available over the internet, then you navigate to the new hosting site. If you (gotta pay to watch) do watch it, Be sure to select the one with English subtitles (my German was not up to par)... the subtitles are only used in portions where an interview is conducted in either Russian or German, but the narration and about 80% of the film is in English. The DVDs for sale are not yet available in the format for North America.
In the first two minutes of this interview from 09/06/22 (same one posted above if you have already watched it) Tina Peters states she has been indicted and what the criminal charges are against her, then mentions getting the subpoena for her phone in connection with the case against Mike Lindell brought by Eric Coomer.
There seems to be some delaying tactics being deployed by the office of the Attorney General of Colorado and some "protect your own" collusion among judges. Just my inference based on what she says in the interview. I've not found any other interviews with her on her status since this date. If anyone has an update please post.
Tina Peters Interview / 06 September 2022 / Lindell Report - frankspeech platform
Excerpt from:
Part 2 / posted 10/11/2022
continue transcription Lindell / Howse 22:44 to 34:26
10/07/22 The Lindell Report / https://frankspeech.com/ (TV menu button)
Lindell : All the lawsuits. Everybody can. Now I want to tell everybody, and we have more news. OK. Now, everybody's going, "Now, Mike. When are you going to put this out there now? When are you going to put this out there?" Its going to come. And I want all you journalists out there, you can write your little hit jobs. But this has to go through... two more processes that, according to the lawyers, but now that we know we can do it. So, and, so what we did, this is another important thing coming before we present it. Before we're going to bring it to the court we're going to show it to the world. I want to show it to the world before we bring it up to, to Judge Nichols up at D.C.. And here's why everybody, today we subpoenaed, and now I got to... I don't even know the names now. Um, will you text Kurt, and tell him, which ones we, the names of the people we subpoenaed. I believe Clapper was one, um, but I don't want to get it right, uh, wrong. These are big names coming at you, Brannon.
Later this segment Lindell reports that his attorney, Kurt Olsen, has subpoenaed James Clapper, and John L. Negroponte, both former Directors of National Intelligence (DNI) and former General Counsel of the FBI James Baker, and that more subpoenas of top officials are incoming.
Any guesses as to just why Lindell's attorneys want all the большие шишки under subpoena before the Montgomery PCAP data is let loose into the wild and then introduced as evidence via discovery in the Dominion lawsuit?
Yes. Its a rhetorical question.
Speaking of Kurt Olsen, former Navy Seal turned constitutional lawyer ...
Peekaboo...
I see you.
15 January 2021, Mike Lindell, after his attempt to have President Trump sign a Presidential Executive Order to lift the Military State Secret Protective Privilege Order in regard to Dennis Montgomery data (the gag order), goes for a walk out the back door of the West Wing of The White House and...
https://cloverchronicle.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Mike-Lindell-White-House-Notes.jpg
IMO we are looking at an update to the fully cleared Q BIGOT list and this act of validation and distribution via long lens photo is the confirmation event and just another scene in Act 2 of WWIII-1-The Video (just a working title).
"The strategy of positioning evades Reality and confronts through Illusion." Sun Tsu
American Hero / Larry Beinart / 1993 / p. 103
Transcripts this Lindell Report broadcast (and other transcripts concerning the Montgomery gag order) - Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4 this post link:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JnYo0CDw/this-is-huge-ncswic-dennis-montg/
If long, dense, information packed nuanced text comments are a problem pass up clicking the link.
Fair warning.
I appreciate your sincerity. It is rarely in evidence on the boards.
I will answer you point by point. The intent is to be informative as to the stylistics and construction of my posts and comments, not to argue the right or wrong of anyone's point of view.
From your first comment/reply in this thread to PepeSee's comment/reply"
"Yeah, I do wish mods would do better at making sure posts are clear…"
The discussion I and others have had about 'some' moderators is when moderation becomes modulation... and that that is a slippery slope.
So, allowing for all of our individual respective faults by nature, IMO, the more the mods stick to calling balls and strikes, safe or out at 1st base, and letting the players alone to play ball the better the board functions.
From your comment/reply to my query asking what is not clear about the post:
"The reference is to the “headline” of the post. Just wasn’t clear what context the question posed was."
By headline, as you note later in your comment, you are referring to the title of the post. I would quibble some about describing it as a headline (I'm not writing a news article, I am posting an excerpt from a legal document), and if that is how you interpret post titles, as headlines, I would recommend, when you see my username on a post, consider it an invitation to be either informed or entertained, sometimes (as in this instance) both in the post title and post text, and thanks to PepeSee, in the thread as well. Nothing more, nothing less. But you will have to work for it because I will only respond to sincere questions about my posts and comments if it is evident someone has done their homework (read the linked primary source documentation or watched the linked videos, either timestamped for quick viewing, or transcribed to save time if the video segment is long, or of significance even if short).
Review my post history (quite short and not curated) for examples. If that is an issue for you, then when you see my username on a post, just pass it up. No harm, no foul, no disappointment, no frustration.
I have a list of bookmarked usernames I absolutely follow every day, and another list (written) of usernames to avoid like the plague. Just a suggestion. If you know you do not like a genre of film or novel, don't buy a ticket to see something you know you already don't like or buy and read a book you have no interest in. I've checked your impressive comment history, and have no worries that you will misconstrue my words on this.
Moving on to the post title itself:
As Lyndon Johnson use to say, "My fellow Americans, let us reason together."
First there was this... 🤡🌎.
Now, in some ways, if 🤡🌎 does not set the stage for what is about to come, I am near helpless to be of any assistance. "Clown World" and then the copy/paste of the excerpt which is preceded by "10." - which indicates there at least nine more potential 🤡🌎 moments preceding this one. And if that were not enough, the text of item "10." identifying Ron Watkins aka CodeMonkey Z aka Q and attempting to elicit from Mike Lindell who's name is admittedly not in the title of the post (but that is because I only had one more letter space left in the length of letters/words allowed in a post title - but that is neither here nor there) but could be inferred (did you see what I did there) by the reference to the Cyber Symposium which was advertised far and wide as Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium held in August of 2021 and the attempt to link Mike Lindell to Q (which, not surprisingly, is true, but unprovable at this time by design - a child can see it).
Now, to understand what's going on with Ron Watkins, you would need to have continuity back to his father, Jim Watkins, and the history of 4chan and 8chan, chosen starting at least as far back in 2017 as Q's platform of choice to host his board to which Q drops were posted by Q and extracted by individuals with read/copy but not write access. And you'd need to know about Mike Lindell, PCAPs and the Cyber Symposium, Tina Peters participation in delivering her before and after forensic images of the vote tabulation equipment in Mesa County, Colorado and Ron Watkins / CodeMonkey Z participation in the live stream event when he and other cyber analysts first attempted to evaluate the before and after forensic images that Mike Lindell had flown up with Tina Peters from Colorado the day before to the Cyber Symposium being held in South Dakota. Think I might not have enough space allocation to have put all that in the title to make it clear what the post is about.
What I'm saying is, lurk more, and learn our comms, if you are having trouble getting the message. However, please note that the first two paragraphs of the post text is explicit about the source of the post's title and what question I was researching - who was behind the confiscation of Mike Lindell's phone, was it Eric Coomer and his defamation lawsuit or was it somehow connected to the indictment and criminal charges against Tina Peters in Colorado (which got resolved by a commenter who knew something about the law, federal criminal cases, and warrants), followed by a link and instructions about how to navigate the primary source document to get to the right page to see the excerpted portion of the legal document which constituted the post title, graphically prefixed with 🤡🌎.
From Attachment 1, Exhibit 1, page number 22, item 10. . (Exhibit 1 is composed of multiple separate filings - so disregard text pagination and use overall document page number to locate this extracted item.)
Link Attachment 1 of Main Document 57 filed 28 September 2022 https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.215068/gov.uscourts.cod.215068.57.1.pdf
Hoping that the matter below has been satisfactory addressed:
"Just wished that the initial question posed could have been given context up top."
How about, up front... i.e. 🤡🌎.
"Is it an interrogatory posed in a deposition yet to be answered? who is asking the question? what is the question’s context? Where is this question being posed?"
Link Attachment 1 of Main Document 57 filed 28 September 2022 https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.215068/gov.uscourts.cod.215068.57.1.pdf
Link Main Document 57 filed 28 September 2022 / Lindell Motion to Stay Discovery https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cod.215068/gov.uscourts.cod.215068.57.0.pdf
In addition to limited space in the post title block...
What else can I say. Did you check out the links? If you had, I don't think you would have asked the questions you did.
If you did check out the links and still had the questions you did... then when you see my posts in the future, save yourself some time and just pass it up. I won't mind because I will never know.
"First to admit, no expert here, too slow witted and impatient— bad combo. I get it."
Sorry. I've checked your comment history. It is not a matter of being expert in anything, only a matter of making the time to inform yourself of the nuances and details and not the headlines and one line snark comments in the threads. I've checked your comment history. You are sharp as a tack and chomping at the bit is not impatience. Its eagerness. Embrace it.
Time is the issue.
Time is the single most difficult obstacle to overcome. So, if you don't have the time to read the linked primary sources and watch the videos, don't worry about it. But do make a comment in posts or on threads that contain lots of links and background information on events you are unfamiliar with, a comment that you can use a bookmark in your history to get back to that post or thread, like when Tina Peters sits for her deposition on November 7th or when discovery is allowed in the Coomer lawsuit, and you will have a quick reference back to one or two places where you can get back into contact with source docs and data and come up to speed on a subject quickly at some point when you have the time.
So when those events occur, instead searching the internet trying to figure out what's up, or relying on second or third hand regurgitated analysis, use your comment bookmarks back to those posts and comments with links to original sources. That kind of footnoting and documenting marks the better posts and comments on the site (sounds like self aggrandizing but its my opinion.)
"BUT…consider the new site visitor looking for something solid and substancial coming across a typical forum post."
Check my post and comment history (recent comment history is a little crowded with some long transcriptions from Mike Lindell speeches and video interviews - scan past them when you hit them.) Capturing, transcribing, analyzing some of the highlights of the day to day events that are speeding by is what I do. This train is not stopping or slowing down for any of us. I got on in 2016. My advice is to jump on and keep up with what is happening today and look ahead to where events seem to be heading. Lurk and learn and when you identify posters and comments you trust, follow their posts and comments. You can learn a lot by observing how some of the older users crack nuts and go down rabbit holes.
Do this... id a username to follow, click on it and view their comment page / history page. Save that URL to your bookmarks, and you can easily check them as often as your time permits...
Here is one of the guys I follow...
https://greatawakening.win/u/MAGAdeburger/
Watch who he follows and then watch who that guy follows, and pretty soon you will be cutting through 90% of the bullshit on GAW.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" (Hamlet Act II. scene ii.)
"But if the “title” or “headline” doesn’t make it clear why someone should be interested in investing such a scare resource as their time, a potential new anon could be lost."
There are anons and there are anons. Q, in the beginning of his post cycle, was pretty harsh with people who would comment on the boards that they "didn't get it" and "why don't you just tell us the answer," or, exactly what you wrote. I won't pretend to know how Q would respond to you at this time, but back in the day it was literally,
.
u/#q2134
.
and that the only easy day was yesterday.
"IMO these types of posts being “featured” really need to be looked over by a third set of eyes. If it’s to be featured, the poster should consider distilling to its very essence, break it down into more easily digestible bites of text. Back in the day, an editor would help the writer discern their intent and help them make it more clear to the time-pressed. Too bad those days are long gone. I miss ‘em."
IMO if these types of posts do not appeal to you, pass them by. Square pegs and round holes, and all that...
"I personally don’t mind reading docs. Not clear at the outset exactly what’s going on here so would really appreciate any help the big brains can provide to us ‘tards."
How about reading the docs first, and then if it is not clear ask for clarification. PepeSee's posted comments about Coomer and the DUI were 100% fabrication, he did not watch the entire video and just made a comment to hear his own voice (read his own words, but you know what I mean). If you are not wiling to first read the documents and then ask questions if you are not clear, you will also be missing the opportunity to inform yourself, on your terms, about what is going on, what is relevant, and won't need anyone to explain things to you.
Do you just want to know things or do you want to understand things? You will not understand if what you know is what someone else told you what it is or is not important to know.
I will leave you with this advice.
Gregg Phillips is constantly admonishing people following him over on Truth Social that...
"Everything Is An Information Operation."
Take that to heart and things will be a whole lot less frustrating and a whole lot more comprehendible.
Endeavor to persevere.
Use to watch M1 perimeter and hanger defense exercises on Bolling (from a distance of course) back in the day.
Impressive. Always lots of smoke and flash bangs.
Fast roping out of helicopters, etc..
Worked in a nearby building that went into lock down during the exercises.
We called it BYBTW Day (bring your binoculars to work).
Had to bring your own lunch on those days too.
That sucked.
Good birddogging... found this
So phone scooped up in connection with Tina Peters indictment, not "COOFER" lawsuit.
https://www.vox.com/2018/9/27/17911728/brett-kavanaugh-boof-definition-supreme-court
Maybe reading the linked primary source documents and watching the videos and not scanning the peanut gallery for enlightenment would clarify the issue.
However, if scanning the comments is your cup of tea then this post is definitely not your huckleberry.
Better yet, complain to the mods that the post is not E'dLY5.
https://youtu.be/Of_jyeDZ3Sg?t=2 (timestamp - 23 seconds)
Part 4 / 10/11/2022
Transcription Lindell / Finchem 53:27 to 59:26
10/07/22 The Lindell Report / https://frankspeech.com/ (TV menu button)
Start transcription at 53:26 / Mike Lindell and Mark Finchem
Finchem: People continue to say, well we've debunked this, and we've debunked that. Really! Show me the evidence that you have debunked anything. What we are putting up is evidence that is uncontrovertible. And they want to call us election deniers. Well, here's a fact. How about we call you a fact denier. We got the receipts.
Lindell : You're exactly right, Mark. And, you know, no judge, listen all you journalists watching now, no judge in the United States has looked at the evidence. They've kicked it down the road for standing. Its almost like a swear word now.
Finchem: Arizona. The case that, thank you very much for supporting Kari Lake and myself. The case in the U.S. District Court here in Arizona. They did not dismiss that case on the evidence. They dismissed it on standing. And we are now in front of the 9th Circuit because the judge there did not have the stones to call the ball. He did not have the guts. He did not have the guts to say, "The declarations you've made and the evidence you have provided shows that the black box tabulation equipment is reliable nor can it be trusted." Instead, he said, "Well, you don't have standing." Really! Lets parse that for a moment. Kari Lake lives in Maricopa County. I live in Pima County. We both ran for state-wide office. We both had our elections counted on machines. We both won in the primary. What we are saying is that the equipment is not trustworthy. And the judge did not have the stones to say, "Well, we're going to decide this on the merits of the case." Instead, he took he coward's approach and said, "Well, you don't have standing." If we don't have standing in that measure, who the hell does?
Lindell : Exactly. You're exactly right, Mark. And they, and remember everybody, that was the first one. We've got the same thing happened in Alabama with that judge down there. But also many, many cases going all the way back last year to the... or a year and a half ago to the Supreme, even the Supreme Court. All this stuff was kicked out for a word we never even heard before called standing. And they can say, realize, everybody, a judge, if they don't want to look at something they can make up that... that word is so broad, "Oh! I'm going to kick it out for standing." You know what I mean. What I've said, Mark, is once one judge stands up, the judges will be the ones to bring our country back.
I don't know if you just heard but the case that I have, just before you came on, by Dennis Montgomery, all the evidence I have there that has been sitting under a government gag order. The government yesterday, they said, "You're not going to show all this other stuff. But, Mike Lindell can bring this to the world. And I believe they sat back and said, "Gee! This is Mike's evidence and now he owns this stuff. You think I was going to sit on it, Mark, or go to jail?
Finchem. No.
Lindell: I would do both. I don't care. We need to save our country. And you know what? I, you know, this, if they, if they wouldn't have done it that way I wouldn't have known what I'd have done because, that is my defense. That is my defense. Here it is, you know.
Finchem. Mike. Elections belong to the people. They do not belong to the government. And for a judge to say the people don't have a right to hear the evidence, that's absurd, I don't know how to get a sense of this jurisprudence. That is a judge standing in the way of the people. If it were not so, Justice Scalia would not have called the people the forth branch of government. We have the legislative, the judicial, and the executive. But who's the forth branch? its the people. 9th Amendment. They don't get to ...
Lindell : Yep. No. Its, ah, I do believe though that once the judges start looking at the evidence... Now, all you journalists, they can't say, "Oh! Its all been debunked. It hasn't been debunked. No one's looked at it. You know what, even the legislatures, Mark, like you say, even legislatures, those cowards, that, and there's so many legislatures that are out there in all the states, that... and I'm talking about Republican ones, they didn't bother, they didn't look in either looking, and do many politicians, to look at the evidence. You know why? Because if once they see, and they know what we know and they see what they see, now they can't play the plausible deniability card. Maybe if I just hunker down. Maybe if I hunker down. You know, "Go away!" Maybe if I shut my ... Mark Brnovich, your Attorney General there, "Maybe if I just act like I'm doing something with nunchucks or what ever." Like what he said he was going to do with those nunchucks. Remember that little dance he did.
Finchem : Yeah.
Lindell : You know, the guy's disgusting. These guys need to step up and that's what we're going to have in this election. And Mark, we're going to see you in a couple of days, you're going to be up by 20 points in those polls. There not even going to be able to try and steal anything. And in Arizona they set the standard down there. I think you got everybody down there going, "Vote the same day." Don't vote early so they can stick your ballot in a box some where and you wonder whose name is on it, you know.
End at 59:26.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Finchem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_(law)
"... to call the ball."
Maverick calls the ball...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XaCG7s2pW8 (5 sec)
Fly The Ball.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-t5IW2RbPU (2 min, 50 sec)
Bruce Lee / Nunchucks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELMtL0ioyck
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Brnovich
Mark Brnovich / Nunchucks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JO-wZykVHDY
Watch the video and then tell me if PepeSee is right.
And then reconsider that "assume"...
https://youtu.be/8vY-4zWKsJM (15 seconds)
You made an inference, an erroneous one at that.
"For those not watching the video, just to clarify, the "arrest" videos are for DUI ..."
The arrest (yes, he was arrested because he was detained, handcuffed, and put into the police vehicle) was not for DUI, it was for running a stop sign, damage to the building that Coomer ran into, leaving the scene of the accident, and what the policemen described as 'attempting to influence a public official' (the first policeman to confront Coomer about the accident and Coomer's denial of any involvement).
You have totally misstated the events and facts in the video.
There is nothing in the post title or the post text to suggest or to imply Coomer's arrest was for a DUI at all.
That is something you made up out of thin air and injected into the thread.
Anyone reading this...
Watch the Coomer video yourself.
Come to your own conclusion about PepeSee's description.
This is what PepeSee and I got into it before about. He makes comments that have no factual basis and when called out he goes hyperbolic.
I do not put up with his shit and no one else should either. I make a point of avoiding this kind forum comment baiting behavior, but there are just some assholes you can't seem to get rid of.
Ignoring them is the advice the mods give, but Job would pull his hair out having to put up with this kind of insufferable bloviating.
What is not clear about the post?
I'm smiling as you tuck you tail between your legs and scurry off.
Again!
And while I'm at it...
"It's easily implied he was arrested for something big, not a DUI that didn't even stick."
When someone implies something (suggests it without saying it explicitly), you have to infer their meaning (conclude what they mean based on the hints that have been given).
https://www.dictionary.com/e/imply-vs-infer/
Now there's an example of semantic nitpicking done correctly.
Get yourself a dictionary.
Doing some more digging to try an figure out if it was Coomer or Griswold after Lindell's phone.
Found this interview of Tina Peters on the day of and shortly after she was subpoenaed to turn over her phone, and she confirms it was in association with the Eric Coomer v. Mike Lindell lawsuit. Interesting that she was subpoenaed to surrender her phone, but Lindell's was confiscated by warrant. He is the defendant in the case, but still...
Tina Peters Interview / 06 September 2022 / go to time 1:54 from start of program
Still digging on Lindell's phone confiscation which was on 13 September 2022, seven days after Peters served with a subpoena.
Yep.
Keep projecting.
Whatever... you're still just verbally masturbating in public.
Its your rep, wallow in it.
Nobody else seems to have your semantic colon spasms, PepeSee.
Do me a favor and quit nitpicking shit nobody but you gives themselves a wedgie over.
When I post about the Trump Tower meeting I will be sure to notify you and u/bubble_bursts in the post text by username so don't worry that you might miss it.
Made a notation on my white board in red marker. 😎
Cheers