Why not? It's not uncommon for people to live past 100. He was a farmer, and they usually get a good amount of physical exercise. He's thin, and in general, thinner people live longer. He kept active as long as possible, doing things with HFH. That is better than being sedentary, health wise. He's a former POTUS and has access to the best healthcare in the country.
I don't see anything unusual in him being alive at 99.
It's creepy. I'll be talking to someone about something that I have never talked about or looked up on my phone before, and when I go do a web search on it, before I'm done typing up my query, it will pop up some autofill search suggestions and what I want to look up is like the 2nd or 3rd on the list.
And it will be random stuff like how many goals Ovechkin needs to break the record or what ewing sarcoma is.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I know. It's from the mocking bird media. But they sourced it from one of his own blogs, so you can go look for his blog to get your sauce for the sauce. It will be good practice for you, I think, to look up something all by yourself like a big boy.
Kennedy, a controversial environmental lawyer whose résumé includes work for the Natural Resources Defense Council and waterway preservation group Waterkeeper Alliance, argued in a 2014 blog post that big oil companies, including Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, "should be given the death penalty." The post, titled, "Jailing Climate Deniers," was a response to claims made at the time that Kennedy said "all climate deniers should be jailed." He denied ever saying such a thing, writing, "I support the First Amendment which makes room for any citizen to, even knowingly, spew far more vile lies without legal consequence.""I do, however, believe that corporations which deliberately, purposefully, maliciously and systematically sponsor climate lies should be given the death penalty," Kennedy wrote for EcoWatch. He named Koch Industries and ExxonMobil as the supervillains behind "a successful multimillion dollar propaganda blitz to mislead the public about global warming using the same techniques honed by Big Tobacco in its campaign to hoodwink the public about smoking." "Laws in every state maintain that companies that fail to comply with prescribed standards of corporate behavior may be either dissolved or, in the case of foreign corporations, lose their rights to operate within that state's borders. These rules can be quite expansive and, in contrast to the U.S. Supreme Court's recent rulings on campaign finance law, companies, under state laws, enjoy far less protection than human beings," he argued. Kennedy suggested that a state attorney general "with the will, resolve and to stand to up to the dangerous and duplicitous corporate propagandists" could not only annul the corporate charters of businesses that dispute climate change, but also nonprofit conservative groups, including the Cato Institute, The Heritage Foundation, American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Still, Kennedy was undeterred. As recently as 2016, he urged then-state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to ban ExxonMobil from doing business in New York for allegedly misleading the public about climate change, according to a memo reported by the New York Post in 2018.
These are things he's said. What do you want, him to personally make a blood vow to you that he means them?
You ask for the sauce, and when someone goes to the trouble of whipping some up for you, you go, eh, I don't like this sauce. Make me some more.
These are the three biggest voting points for presidential candidates right now. You think RFK Jr. is going to just sit back and let the MSM lie about these voting topics without making a stink?
He probably has his answers to these questions on his campaign page. Or on his blog. Or his twitter account. Or hell, in some of the books he's written on the subject. And if you don't trust what he says on his campaign page and his blog, and on twitter, and in his books, go look up videos of town halls and interviews he's done about them. And then, you know, watch the videos.
And just because he says that people are using climate change to try to control people doesn't mean he thinks climate change is fake. He wants to impose all sorts of laws and fines on certain businesses because he thinks they're leading to climate change. Did you even bother to read the article you linked? Because in that very article, he says:
First of all, let me just say this about climate, I believe that carbon in the atmosphere and methane does increase warming. Look around, you can see it everywhere. Ice caps are melting, etc. The Greenland ice sheet, I spent a lot of time outdoors, and I see that. over 69 years, I’ve seen the changes. And I’ve seen them — the mass migration of animals, of southern animals like black vultures, the northern increase in their ranges. I’ve kept track since I was a kid about when the leaves turn, and it steadily moved up each year.
And why can't you look this stuff up yourself? Do you not know how to?
I honestly would like to know why you can't figure out how to look up something as easy as a presidential candidate's stances on the three most controversial topics right now. Which means the three most discussed topics and a man who has gotten a ton of coverage. He's a Kennedy, for crying out loud. He's lived his entire life in the public eye. It's not like he's Joe Blow from some podunk place no one has ever heard of. He's a public figure. But you couldn't find any of this info on him yourself?
What exactly did you do to find these answers for yourself before you started treating people here like they're your personal secretaries? Walk me through the steps you took before you gave up on searching for things yourself.
Because I have to wonder at the utter incompetence of someone who can't find any info on this stuff without asking others to do it for them. You should have come across some of it just by NOT living under a rock the past few years.
I don't downvote anyone. I don't know why you would assume that it was me, when I went to all the trouble of looking for sources for you.
And a research board isn't just a place you go to get other people to do your research for you.
YOU need to put in at least the minimum amount of work for yourself. It's not in the least bit hard to find out what a presidential candidate's stance is on major voting points like abortion, climate change, and guns. They're asked that ALL THE TIME.
Why the hell would we want RFK Jr. as VP?
He pushes climate change. He was an environmental lawyer for decades.
He approves of abortions.
"The only thing I can say to you on that issue is that I'm pro-choice," Kennedy said. "I don't think there's anybody in this country who's worked harder for medical freedom, for bodily autonomy, than me."
He's in favor of gun control. He says he doesn't want to take guns away, but he is in favor of gun control.
"I am not going to take people's guns away, and I believe in gun control myself,"
https://www.wmur.com/amp/article/kennedy-abortion-gun-control-nuclear-power/44273836
But we're supposed to ignore all that? Why? Because he's against vaccines?
https://www.wmur.com/article/kennedy-abortion-gun-control-nuclear-power/44273836
He has gone back and forth on gun control. It depends on who asks him. He's consistent in saying he doesn't want to take guns away, but he waffles on gun control laws.
Kennedy said that he would get behind a bipartisan assault weapons ban, which the overwhelming majority of Democrats support,
What do you not like about RFK?
He pushes climate change stuff. He was an environmental lawyer for decades.
He's in favor of abortions.
"The only thing I can say to you on that issue is that I'm pro-choice," Kennedy said. "I don't think there's anybody in this country who's worked harder for medical freedom, for bodily autonomy, than me."
https://www.wmur.com/article/kennedy-abortion-gun-control-nuclear-power/44273836
He approves of gun control laws. He doesn't support taking guns away, but he wants to make it hard to get them.
"I am not going to take people's guns away, and I believe in gun control myself,"
Have you really never read anything about him?
I don't think RFK Jr is that popular among democrats. He is very critical of all vaccines, and has been for a long time. Remember that controversial feature in Rolling Stone magazine? That pissed off every democrat I know, and I don't think his reputation has improved much since then.
I'm not saying that Christians aren't being persecuted in general.
I'm saying that there is no obvious reason why the writer made her religion an issue here. I just feel that it was a tactic to trigger an emotional response in other Christians.
Nope.
Why do you keep making these comments about nothing?
All you're doing is reinforcing the idea that you have no idea what you're talking about and your entire "education" on it came from a meme. Or that you work in a Russian troll farm.
You've spent hours saying nothing at all. It would only take you two minutes to describe what a Republic is and how it differs from a democracy.
It should be very easy for you.
I don't know why you wouldn't share this knowledge. After all, even President Trump has succumbed to brainwashing by leftists. Because he thinks we have a democracy as well.
It's important that you tell everyone the facts about all this and tell us what your sources are. Because even the president of the United States has been using fake sources, apparently.
No, you haven't. All you've said is Democracy means mob rule and repeated yourself over and over that the word Republic is in the Constitution, and the word Democracy is not.
So you think that's all that's involved in Democracy? Mob rule?
And you've never said what you think a Republic is.
Yes, people are always called shills if they disagree with someone.
You can clear all this up just by sharing what you think a Republic is, and how it is different than a Democracy.
You've spent hours repeating yourself over and over. Surely you can spare two minutes of your time by sharing what you think a Republic is.
It should be easy for you.
All the research out there is wrong, apparently. And even Presidents of the United States are looking at the wrong sources.
Seriously, why can't you tell us what you think a Republic is and what you think a Democracy is?
Hey, if a gay prostitute and drag queen says it on Twitter, it must be true! I am 100% certain that he will come through with videos and evidence in a couple of weeks.
This is sarcasm, for those that can't identify it online.
So we've seen this for 4 years now. What has been the biggest win we've had in October?