by BQnita
2
Can-Maga 2 points ago +2 / -0

2 weeks

by BQnita
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Can-Maga 2 points ago +2 / -0

No one was called a jew at that time, it was Judean. All the conflicts of the Bible come from our own lack of knowledge, and when you use that methodology I described earlier, you realize it's all about race, and every conflict disappears.

2
Can-Maga 2 points ago +2 / -0

I never said you were, I'm am - if you look at the Greek and Hebrew with lexicons and other writings of the time it's quite clear. Judean is the real word, and due to Edomites flooding Judea after the Assyrian deportations, it's merely a geographical identifier, though Christ could tell the wheat from the tears, unlike the apostles. "One among you is a devil" - what group behaves the same as Judas Iscariot? Should be obvious.

The people we call jews today are "those that say they are Judeans and are not" and they have the same behavior as their ancestors that killed our God come in the flesh as Christ. Goyim means nations, and in context, only refers to the other Israelite nations scattered by the Assyrian deportation. The KJV has many translation errors, including adding universalist language in Paul's writings.

The people of the USA, only the pure Whites, were already under God's covenant, so of course OP's pic is applicable to us, same as all pure Whites around the world.

The Bible isn't archetypal, it's the history of our people, and it's been hijacked by the Edomites of today. You can't make up a new covenant without it being in there, as there are no more prophets. It's blasphemy to do so.

2
Can-Maga 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm Christian Identity. It's much the same probably, just a lot more solid if you want to get down to the Greek and Hebrew. We believe that Christ is God come in the flesh, Christianity is a White only religion, and the jewish(false Judean) problem.

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-basics

3
Can-Maga 3 points ago +3 / -0

The nation of Israel broke the old covenant and God made a new one with the same people. It was never with those that say they are Judeans and are not.

No one else was brought into it.

4
Can-Maga 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's fairly clear at this point that he's on par with operation trust.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
2
Can-Maga 2 points ago +3 / -1

Controlled opposition to quell our rage. Jews are in control, not Patriots, unless we all wake up and fight back

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
1
Can-Maga 1 point ago +1 / -0

To make you say whatever I want you to say. For those that don't get it.

6
Can-Maga 6 points ago +6 / -0

Does that include the testicle destruction the first one had?

1
Can-Maga 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't operation trust the same as this q stuff?

3
Can-Maga 3 points ago +3 / -0

(((they))) are more than .1% of the world's population, so...

6
Can-Maga 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm sure he knew it was extremely likely at that point, at least deep down

1
Can-Maga 1 point ago +1 / -0

And if it is in countries that never had slavery, what can you infer?

3
Can-Maga 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now do black crime in other white countries and try saying the same thing

1
Can-Maga 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not even what turning the other cheek means. You'll have to look it up yourself though, I forget.

view more: Next ›