The guy owns or at least controls a satellite constellation that can/could see everywhere and anywhere at once. He also owns/controls X, and has Tesla mega-factories in China. Is there anything new for him to really glean from such a meeting?
All in all, she had one of the most successfull political careers in history. Going from the bottom of the barrel, to being VP and running twice for president, while spending more than $1B dollars in a campaign, $20M in the hole... legendary.
What about you start with some examples instead of creating a vapid post?
What about no and they can fuck right off? Not my country, not my citizens, not my problem. We barely got rid of less than 100k in two months, and now we are going to take in 67k retards from another shithole an ocean away?
Best we could do is ship them guns and wish them good luck.
Who exactly are you trying to protects? There's a couple hundred retards in this forums at most, and they all believe the same fairytales, let them be.
Turns out the rocher you are, the more you can rely on other people's money.
It's hard to believe that these people descend from one of the most advanced civilizations in human history. Bahgdad at one point had a library that shadowed the legendary Alexandria. Was it all the inbreeding that turned them away from women towards herd animals?
Imagine stealing $1.6M and still being a postal worker
Nah, what we are living through is not liberalism proper. We got a bunch of great shit out of it 60s & 70s, like civil rights and etc. I think nowadays people use the keyword "progressive" to describe that kind of hate filled rethoric. On the same page, conservative has become associated with being christian and having traditional values.
A stretch. Ass stretch. Ostrich.
This account routine posts false or inflated claims for attention and to farm engagement por profit.
Oh yes, great out of our money.... So now congress can determine that hating the president is a mental illness, do they also get to commit people to institutions or take people's kids away?
What do yall think happens when a regime falls and the former supporters are left unprotected? These are Assad people, and the are now fighting for their lives.
All they can do is trespass them from the property. Didn't seem like they did any property damage.
I guess you meant to ask what she has done to advance the conservative agenda. Here's what Grok thinks:
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022)
Ruling: The Court overturned Roe v. Wade, eliminating the constitutional right to abortion and returning regulation to the states (6-3 decision).
Barrett’s Role: Voted with the conservative majority. This fulfilled a long-standing conservative goal to reverse federal abortion protections, reflecting her skepticism of broad abortion rights from her academic and judicial history.
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022)
Ruling: Expanded Second Amendment rights by striking down New York’s restrictive concealed-carry law, emphasizing a "history and tradition" test for gun laws (6-3 decision).
Barrett’s Role: Joined the majority. Her vote aligned with conservative advocacy for broader gun rights, consistent with her earlier dissent as an appeals court judge in Kanter v. Barr (2019), where she questioned felony gun bans.
West Virginia v. EPA (2022)
Ruling: Limited the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act, invoking the "major questions doctrine" (6-3 decision).
Barrett’s Role: Voted with the majority. This curbed federal regulatory power, a key conservative priority to reduce the administrative state’s reach.
Carson v. Makin (2022)
Ruling: Held that Maine’s exclusion of religious schools from a state-funded tuition program violated the Free Exercise Clause (6-3 decision).
Barrett’s Role: Joined the majority. This advanced the conservative agenda of expanding religious liberty and public funding for religious institutions.
Trump v. United States (2024)
Ruling: Granted former President Donald Trump broad immunity from prosecution for alleged crimes related to official acts, significantly limiting accountability (6-3 decision).
Barrett’s Role: Voted with the majority but wrote a concurrence, agreeing on immunity for official acts while questioning some evidentiary limits. This supported a conservative stance favoring executive power, though her narrower approach showed restraint.
Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2024)
Ruling: Extended the statute of limitations for challenging federal regulations, making it easier to contest agency rules (6-3 decision).
Barrett’s Role: Wrote the majority opinion. This bolstered conservative efforts to challenge federal overreach by agencies.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (2021)
Ruling: Upheld a Catholic agency’s right to refuse same-sex couples as foster parents under the Free Exercise Clause, without overturning precedent (unanimous decision, but conservative framing).
Barrett’s Role: Joined the majority and wrote a concurrence, signaling support for religious exemptions—a conservative priority—while avoiding broader precedent shifts.
Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022)
Ruling: Affirmed state jurisdiction to prosecute crimes by non-Natives on tribal lands, alongside federal authority (5-4 decision).
Barrett’s Role: Voted with the majority. This aligned with conservative views favoring state power over expansive tribal sovereignty interpretations.
These rulings highlight Barrett’s consistent support for conservative outcomes in high-profile cases, particularly on abortion, guns, religion, and regulatory limits. However, her approach often emphasizes narrower rulings over sweeping changes, reflecting her judicial philosophy of restraint, rooted in textualism and originalism from her mentor, Antonin Scalia. While she occasionally diverges (e.g., dissenting in Ohio v. EPA (2024) on air pollution or concurring separately in Trump v. United States), her record solidly places her within the Court’s conservative bloc on core agenda items as of March 13, 2025.
I've seen at least 5 different designs of this fake document over the last 10 years.
I guess yall only like the rule of law and the constitution when it works expressly in your favor. Trump's team is trying things, and they will not be able to do absolutely everything they want by executive order. Such is a feature of the separation of powers that the founders envisioned.
Wtf, and I naively expect this video to be in english, but is in jihadic. I don't mind that some people are qualified to get green cards and citizenship, but why do they all want to run for office if they don't pledge allegiance to our nation?
The smoke detector chirp...
Is our national deficit about to solve itself? Have we been defrauded so blatantly for decades?
We are on track to owe $40T to foreign and domestic corporations. Do we get to claw back any of it to back it back?
Not really what he said... he said "I'll trade being president for Ukraine joining NATO"
The Red Cross seems to be corrupt, but this video is garbage. Honestly, I could think some gangster in Nigeria was using the boxes to launder his money.
They were making so much money everywhere else they probably don't needed the drama, most likely based on cost
Well, according to establishment surveys, Trump is popular with close to 60% of the population
South Afrika is a corrupt developing country XD what the fuck are you smoking? You are very confused my friend, these are garbage human beings from a shithole nation, and they have no apparent skills. You can personally pay for their housing and healthcare if you like. The border is closed.