1
Chairman_Downlord 1 point ago +1 / -0

Abrupt segue there from the mocking condescension towards the audit to the super serious and perilous “cliff of Trump”. It’s as if the late nite show comedic punditry routine is what these msm people think journalism is. Truly bizarre

by BQnita
2
Chairman_Downlord 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rich robbing the poor is business? I’m sure there are examples like hedge fund fuckery and corporate bailouts that could be brought up but statements like this without context sound downright Marxist

0
Chairman_Downlord 0 points ago +2 / -2

I agree. Also he needs to hire an editor. The guy is in love with commas. Punctuation is so fucked it’s hard to read

2
Chairman_Downlord 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or a hundred ns

0
Chairman_Downlord 0 points ago +2 / -2

We aren’t in anyone’s ranks. All this talk of discouraging violence and disavowing it sounds retarted. The meme war wasn’t won with “tactics” and “trusted leaders”, it’s not what any of this has been about. This whole essay stinks of psy op glow faggery

6
Chairman_Downlord 6 points ago +6 / -0

*AJ is rendered speechless momentarily

2
Chairman_Downlord 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretentious overpriced piss water. Maybe being woke is the right marketing strategy for them. The pie graph of pretentiousness to wokeness tend to have a generous overlap

2
Chairman_Downlord 2 points ago +2 / -0

“ they are essentially envisioning a bunch of federal workers knocking on your door, telling you you’ve got to do something that you don’t want to do. That’s absolutely not the case, it’s trusted messengers who are part of the community doing that—not government officials. ”

Herr Fauci decrees that the retarded serfs shall trust the geshtapo and be gratefull

1
Chairman_Downlord 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you watch the video, which I do not recommend doing, they are clearly being facetious. They say they are trying to convert peoples kids into being ‘tolerant and nice’ and that the gay agenda is about ‘inclusion’ instead of being about promoting sodomy. The song is an attempt at a humorous subversion of the critiques aimed at gays but joking about messing with peoples kids is not going to be well received outside of sanfranshitsco

*over on the Donald someone pointed out that one of the singers in that choir is a convicted child molester so I guess it’s not all facetious

2
Chairman_Downlord 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.weforum.org/projects/cyber-polygon

Partners: Banco Santander BI.ZONE IBM International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Mobile Telesystems (MTS) Sberbank Ericsson Trend Micro Visa World Economic Forum

1
Chairman_Downlord 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wondered the same. Something very strange about this picture

1
Chairman_Downlord 1 point ago +1 / -0

An? As in ‘an hero,’ as in arkancide?

3
Chairman_Downlord 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can move large amounts of money around and bypass the SMART infrastructure with any crypto, the appeal of Bitcoin is that as long as satoshi doesn’t show up and dump his coins than the amount of Bitcoin available is fixed and therefor non inflationary. Either way, all transactions are public so it’s not particularly useful for money laundering

1
Chairman_Downlord 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hot take, satoshi is actually an alphabet boy. Quite a stretch there but is it any less believable than satoshi being a private individual that walked away from all that power and money

3
Chairman_Downlord 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, using the signal app or it’s analogues is like texting your shady dealings directly to your local fbi field office hotline. It’s hard to believe any sophisticated criminal organization would have fallen for that. Then again, criminals by definition tend to make poor life choices

5
Chairman_Downlord 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree with the general sentiment but there seems to a misunderstanding regarding what Bitcoin is and does. Bitcoin is an open ledger, its security is derived from everyone being able to see the transactions. There are “privacy coins” that are most likely honey pots but Bitcoin and similar open ledger cryptos don’t offer privacy. They offer a potential decoupling from the nwo banking elite. Whether or not the sec and the fed start clamping down on exchanges and limit the potentially destabilizing force that de-fi represents has yet to be seen. Whether or not Bitcoins inventor is going to appear out of the wood work and gut the whole project taking with him billions of dollars is yet to be seen. Either way, blockchain tech represents a way to make transactions of all kinds more transparent not more private. If you want privacy use cash or physical assets. Anything digital is inherently insecure and everyone knows it

2
Chairman_Downlord 2 points ago +2 / -0

The way micron grabbed that dudes forearm all aggressive like, he’s lucky he got the inside of the hand

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›