1
Charlatanism 1 point ago +1 / -0

May/June 2021 - Volume 28 - Issue 3 - p e299-e318 - Not sure when it was technically published or written however, there does seem to be a newer edition, the July/August edition. So it looks like it must be a month or so old? Just guessing.

2
Charlatanism 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is huge.

It really highlights the fraud and gaslighting that's been done.

Think of all the doctors being discredited for political purposes, it's all garbage. Nothing can stop what's coming in this case, same with the vaccinated dying - it's coming out more every day.

15
Charlatanism 15 points ago +15 / -0

Well, I'd say they succeeded then. That's the whole goal to devolve them into pleasure seeking adult infants, extended adolescence that was spoken of so much years ago. Extended education while not educating, just indoctrinating. Focus on only the now, the present, and no ability to foresee beyond that moment. More akin to an animal.

1
Charlatanism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can't stand it, but it's doable. It's really nice from say October-April most of the time.

1
Charlatanism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really hard to have faith if he starts walking around talking about 2024.

by Quelle
4
Charlatanism 4 points ago +4 / -0

"The order requires Attorney General Merrick Garland to publicly release any declassified documents on the attacks over the next six months."

So still a lot of juice classified I'm guessing? Otherwise, I immediately think what is his motive here, not the guy I would suspect to release anything.

2
Charlatanism 2 points ago +2 / -0

9/11 should always be on the radar until it is resolved, imo.

by Quelle
2
Charlatanism 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks, love this kind of stuff.

by Quelle
2
Charlatanism 2 points ago +2 / -0

Awesome.

by Quelle
7
Charlatanism 7 points ago +7 / -0

I certainly wouldn't accept my child was dead without observing the corpse, barring complete mutilation, and even then I'd probably still need to see something..

by Quelle
1
Charlatanism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't aware of this and figured oh, maybe the tie is loose at best..

I can't believe it 's the exact picture. You don't make that kind of mistake, wtfff!

by Quelle
2
Charlatanism 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know.. I took a peek last night and it was bad.

by Quelle
6
Charlatanism 6 points ago +6 / -0

What!~

1
Charlatanism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crazy, people aren't willing to hear this - but soon the deluge of information will be irrefutable. Vaccinated are being infected quite a lot, nowhere near the fractions of a percent people have been convinced is true.

8
Charlatanism 8 points ago +8 / -0

Isn't it funny how quick they were to impeach (meaningless) Trump..? McConnell sucks, but it's par for the course. All of them are sellouts and rinos

1
Charlatanism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here's what I can't figure out though, the data comes from an article which says the data is from Public Health England. I checked out their site and they have all kind of useful data, but I see no clear way to cross reference the vaccine status vs their death.

Any data pros care to help point this out to me? Maybe I'm missing something on this site.

3
Charlatanism 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hate anytime I hear 2024. Bunch of bullshit.

1
Charlatanism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Having nothing to do with inside job - just the government response (Patriot Act/Surveillance, etc). That's a whole different discussion that can be had outside of liberty erosion.

3
Charlatanism 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed, that's what the revised papers on Moderna state (8/27/21)

1
Charlatanism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only bad news I see out of this is that majority of under 50 deaths seem to be unvaccinated, but not sure how many that is exactly.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›