If you would like some background you could start here: https://www.youtube.com/user/Suspicious0bservers
There's also an interresting take on the past and possible future of Earth on that channel which does align with the stories depicted in the Bible here and a shorter version here (all YouTube links)
I was raised an atheist but with an open mind so those video's were quite inspiring and eye openers for me.
The Earth's magnetic field is weakening, and changing. Birds use the Earth's magnetic field to find their way. These birds are not dropping dead, they drop because of their percieved loss of the field and some will obviously die upon impact with the ground.
https://nitter.net/AnonymeCitoyen/status/1487801077563117575
https://nitter.net/AnonymeCitoyen/status/1487782013159587844
Origin: https://archive.is/HlisM
Original link, you can read in English from here: https://www.ninefornews.nl/overal-in-nederland-ontstaan-vrijheidskonvooien-opmaat-voor-landelijke-actie/#
(Can't seem to link English language but you can press a flag on top right on the original link)
EDIT: Forgot a YT mirror, here -> https://files.catbox.moe/rxtg1v.webm
I remember watching this movie as a kid, and I recently did so again (44 now).
I've always felt out of touch with the world and I remember how much I loved this movie as it showed both evil and good. This movie made me realise there were bad people from a very young age.
No password means no encryption over WiFi. So the question that remains is how any data, if at all, was transferred over said WiFi; and what kind of services/ports were open on the systems. If the transfer of data was encrypted using VPN/HTTPS/TLS or anything, and also using decent set of standards, only then your argument (and you did mention that part) is fully correct. But that question goes rather conveniently unanswered.
My POV: The issue here isn't about WiFi being secure or not. But you should immediately start asking why WiFi was even allowed in this case. Go to any security event such as DefCon and you'll know why visitors disable their WiFi.
Edit: I'm also wondering right now if they were using channel isolation. Ever connected to WiFi in a hotel and seen someone else's Chromecast? I have, and that basically means you can view what someone else is watching. (And so much more)
Would one of the mods be so kind as to send me a pm?
I'd like discuss something which I can be seen as a massive red pill, but has nothing to do with Q and I don't want to make useless posts. I will send you what I found and then you can decide.
A UUID is supposed to be always unique. The chance of creating a duplicate UUID is so very, very small; it's negligible. But probably far, far greater than Biden winning the election.
Then the simple fact that a UUID is used for a filename, that's something I personally find odd.
Using a random name for a picture is something I can get behind. But actually using a UUID for a filename? I feel (intuition) that the chances of that happening by chance are probably similar as generating two similar UUID's.
Just a VPN isn't always good enough if you're really afraid.
And if you want to see an interesting comparison, and much more, regarding VPNs:
https://www.safetydetectives.com/best-vpns/#simple-vpn-comparison
This info used to be on another website, it's still good though. Or at least it will give you some food for thought, you can still verify the details yourself. (best way to learn!)
As a European... Wait f^&* this I'm not European, just Dutch, I can't help but agree, and I am laughing my ass off all the way.