Some people have said that "telegraphing their plans" is part of their satanic religion... one of their rules is that they have to tell people (one way or another) what they are going to do.
I am not sure if that is true or not. Maybe others can verify or refute that.
Actually I am pretty sure it was for the money. They could not get the EUA for their "vaccines" if there were any effective treatments available, which is why they had to lie about HCQ, Ivermectin, etc.
That caused a lot of needless deaths among old, sick people that are the most susceptible to the virus... but I think their real motive was the many billions in revenue... although the increased deaths did help them push their vaccines, justify the lockdowns, etc.
You should not take the Quercetin (zinc ionophore) daily.
Zinc interferes with the normal functioning of your cells. As a positive ion, normally it cannot get inside of cells to interfere. The Quercetin allows the Zinc to get inside your cells.
That is great when a virus is taking over cell function to produce more viruses. The Zinc inhibits replication of the virus (decreased viral load) making it much easier for your immune system to defeat the virus.
Causing that to happen every day when you are not fighting a virus? Not so good. That is why the protocols for HCQ and Quercetin are for 5 days when you feel symptoms - NOT every day.
The global warming scam, along with climategate in 2009 woke me up. I studied paleoclimate as part of a degree in geophysics a long time ago, before science was politicized. I understand the many changes that have occurred in the earth's climate over geologic time, and how the global warming narrative was completely based on lies. The climategate emails showed the "scientists" deliberately falsifying and fabricating data to fit their political agenda.
The purpose of the climate scam was to scare the sheeple and stampede them toward a socialist world government. Given our current situation, that should sound vaguely familiar...
The big difference between a conspiracy theory and a legitimate topic of discussion is called EVIDENCE and/or PROOF. This post has some evidence (a little shaky, but its a start) so it is not a conspiracy theory...
So, that is how you can tell the difference.
Nitter might help with that...
Well, I know Lin Wood is more of a "rabble rouser" than a political leader, but the other guy is a complete RINO. I am sick to death of RINO's, personally.
I would rather give Lin Wood a chance to grow into being a good political leader than trust a RINO.
First, there is no reason whatsoever for ANYONE to get those injections. Period. They have a higher risk than the chinese virus itself, and they are not effective at all. Plus, there are easy and inexpensive preventions and treatments that are well proven, very effective and extremely safe.
Second, the injections are a tool for big pharma to make many billions in recurring revenue with "top up" shots every year, and as an excuse to introduce social score systems (like the chinese version) to other countries. The motivations are money and control - not depopulation.
The whole depopulation thing has no facts to support it - just wild speculation (I read the interview with the Pfizer VP and he never said the injections would kill people within 18 to 24 months, etc.). All of that is just fake news.
OK, I did some digging into the interview of the Pfizer VP.
First, he states that the primary purpose is to force the introduction of monitoring and control over populations, by way of the injections and all the later "top up" injections to follow.
That provides big pharma with many billions of dollars in revenue along with building databases of every person in each country... and their vaccination status as the excuse to do all of it. Think of it as a justification to build the Chinese social score system in other countries.
So the motives are money and control. That makes sense, and that puts a different spin on President Trump's support for vaccinations that force the leftists to open up the economy. He can put a stop to the efforts to control people using the data fairly easily once he resumes office.
The whole depopulation thing is speculation, and the Pfizer VP admitted that. He said that nefarious depopulation motives were a possibility - not that it was the real thing or that there was any evidence to support it.
Edit: in another post
Pfizer fired one of its chief immunologist for spilling the beans, he has stated that within 18-24 months of taking the vax, most people will be dead. If not sooner.
That is just a flat out lie. The Pfizer VP never said anything like that, as I described above.
I saw this excuse used yesterday when morons were caught spreading the fake quote. "I didn't say it was a quote", and "there aren't any quotation marks", etc.
So I guess that counts as fake plagiarism then, taking credit for a fake quote that isn't a quote that they did not come up with themselves.
In other news, water is wet and morons are moronic...
That fake Q quote is deeply ingrained into idiots on this site... no matter how many times you inform them that it is fake.
Especially given how easy it is to do a quick search to find that the quote does not exist in any Q post...
There are several layers to this.
First, operation warp speed sabotaged the DS effort to lock down the world for years, destroying the world economy in the process.
Second, it rushed the multiple "vaccines" to market long before they could be approved, so they are experimental and voluntary.
As for the fake vaccines themselves - that is difficult to figure out. They don't protect people from getting infected or stop people from infecting others... so they are basically useless.
Add the fact that we have good ways to boost our immune systems (vitamin C, D, selenium) and effective treatments (Ivermectin, HCQ, Zinc, etc.) means that there is really no need for a vaccine in the first place.
So the real question is: what is the true purpose of the injections? Why is the DS pushing so hard for people to get injected? That is what we all need to figure out ASAP - everything else is just noise.
The guy was already a security risk, publishing a book while on active duty... expressing political opinions while promoting his book...
He was relieved for those reasons, not for the specific political beliefs as the headline was phrased to suggest.
You can't trust clowns like that in top positions, breaking rules to line their own pockets, etc. Extremely bad judgement on his part.