2
Double_D 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rothschild

Rockefeller

Soros

Gates

The Pope

Hussein

The Clintons

Biden

Brennan

Comey/Rosenstein

This list could be SO much longer

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tim Pool and Shapiro are about the cuckiest cucks around.

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

We knew this a good 6 months ago.

Don't let people think we're just getting scientific evidence now. That point is crucial to them understanding they were manipulated.

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, no, he hasn’t actually provided any evidence to us that substantiates his claims.

That doesn’t mean they’re not true but it definitely doesn’t mean they are.

I’d be thrilled if he has evidence to prove his claims but it’s going to take a lot more than a letter and filing a lawsuit (which anyone can do) before I take him seriously, much less tell all the people I know about it like it’s fact.

I don’t know either way. Neither do you.

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

“That’s what Anons do”

Lol. Give me a break.

I’ve listened to at least a couple of hours of his interviews and don’t really recall anything being provided that would bolster his credibility. I’m not saying he didn’t. Just saying I don’t recall. Why I’m asking.

He’s made some extremely big claims. I’m going to need something concrete before I believe anything he says.

I’ll try to be more clear.

What specifically has he provided that makes you so confident he’s not bullshitting, to the point that you would take a condescending tone?

2
Double_D 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has John here to help ever provided anything to substantiate his claims or lend himself credibility?

3
Double_D 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck Rand Paul.

The time to start talking about election fraud isn’t a few weeks after you vote to certify a fraudulent election.

“We’ll get it fixed for the next election” is some limp dick shit.

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, is Wood getting all his info from @johnheretohelp?

Did @johnheretohelp ever provide anything to us to establish his credibility? I remember he made a lot of fantastic claims but I don’t remember seeing any evidence to substantiate them. Did I miss something?

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

They were created to topple the Assad regime in Syria.

WTF are you talking about?

2
Double_D 2 points ago +2 / -0

Watch the rest of the Biden video. Becerra is in it. He participated in the event remotely. He was on a tv next to Biden a little bit after the weird voice thing.

Most likely, he was talking shop with an aide or maybe on the phone while waiting for his part in the Biden event. His mic was hot, either on his end or the white house end. They fixed it quickly.

It sounds like Becerra

He participated in the event

He's an AG, so would explain the legal talk

I guess it's not 100% definitive without voice analysis but it seems a lot more likely than the alternative theory.

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's most likely Xavier Becerra, the California AG, who was participating in the event remotely. Sounds like him. Would also explain somewhat what he's talking about. He's the AG. Was probably talking shop with an aide or was on the phone while waiting for his part in Biden's event. Somebody accidentally had the mic on, either on his end or the white house's end.

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is there a big arrow pointing at the Secret Service guy?

You realize he was still an agent when Trump was there, right?

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

The plan may have been bullshit but the tireless research done by anons and the dissemination of that very real info to normies wasn’t.

Millions more are now awake (to varying degrees) because of it.

Some would say that, by trusting the plan, we were complacent or inactive when, in reality, I think we did more and expended more time and energy to further the cause than most.

I’ll never apologize for hoping someone in Washington was actually fighting for us.

4
Double_D 4 points ago +4 / -0

It really depends on what the report says about how and to what extent China interfered, doesn’t it?

For all we know, it just says they bought some FB ads.

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weak.

Roll Tide, faggot

2
Double_D 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dark to Light.

If I remember correctly, Q mentioned Dark to Light prior to Trump’s first summit with NK. After/during the summit, it was reported in the media that Trump showed Kim a stylized movie trailer showing the leader what the future of his country could look like if he chose the right path. The theme of the trailer? Dark to Light.

Like I said, that’s just how I remember it. I hope someone will correct me if my timeline is off.

Right around that time, there was the welcoming home of the U.S. prisoners from NK. On the tarmac were two fire engines hoisting an american flag. The engine numbers on the side of the trucks both started with Q. Q pointed it out and told everyone to search images of fire trucks and note how many truck numbers started with a letter. As far as I recall, none of them did.

These examples by no means convinced me that Q’s intent was as stated but I think they pretty much convinced me that Q was an administration insider

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

They’re easily manipulated because they spend their lives seeking the approval of others. They assume everyone else is the same as they are.

1
Double_D 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just have a hard time believing Gen Flynn could be manipulated with bad intel or would knowingly endorse something (Q) that would be detrimental to our republic.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›