Greg Kelly is the only reason I watch. Love that guy
Funnily enough, I was very keen to get into it, but I knew I had to pray hard about it. And I just didn’t feel peace about getting into it. Very glad that I didn’t now, thanks mate
EDIT: maybe I should get in NOW though?? Haha DFV is still in it
He hasn’t gone anywhere! ?
Hey fellow Kiwi, could you link me some sources about CCP and our govt? I hadn’t heard it before but it makes a whole lot of sense
Thanks for the tip, could be extremely relevant in the coming weeks/months! God bless
I read somewhere that the stock price could actually go up into the thousands and beyond. Is that possible? If so, I don’t want to fall into the fallacy of falling for the nominal value but rather percentage. So if the peak is going to be 1000% from where it is now, it makes sense to still buy even though I was better off doing it a month ago
I was thinking along the same lines, I still love his vitality but I take this verse very seriously:
“Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:” 1 John 4:2
I read somewhere that we haven’t even seen the short squeeze yet?
‘Strongly advise doing either’ haha what does this mean?
Buying real silver bullion or silver stocks?
Yeah kinda just realising this. Everyone on a wsbets forum will tell me to buy because it helps their position, whereas media shills will say to get out because it helps them. Very hard to know who to trust which is why I asked on GA.win because I feel like there’s some honour here
Hey man, this is not solicitation of official financial advice or anything, but do you think I should buy some GME in the dip today? I’ve got severe FOMO
Surely they have weaseley legal ways of screwing you though, like acquiring the folded company first and saying we still the same entity?
Would this work for a sum as large as a house mortgage though?
Deflates it so it’s not blocking our view and maybe we can see what is really going to happen
This should be stickied.
“And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment” Hebrews 9:27
You use the Bible to make some of your points, but the Bible contradicts your claim in another place. This is what I meant by twisting Scripture
I say this in love ? please watch this
Do you believe that Jesus of Nazareth was uniquely God incarnate? Not as in ‘everyone is God, Jesus just realised it’, but truly YHWH Himself in the flesh?
What exactly is inaccurate? I didn’t include primary sources because this is a casual forum discussion, but I wrote from doctrinal statements on an Orthodox website. Why are the bishops not allowed to be married when even Peter was married and Paul explicitly describes it as a doctrine of devils?
As someone not affiliated with orthodoxy but who has a deep love for Christ, His Word and His church, there is enough in this issue alone to be extremely wary as the Holy Ghost warns me in Colossians 2:8- “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ”
Yes I am familiar with autocephaly, but that is only granted by permission of an ecumenical orthodox council. My church has not sought this permission from any council. I live in New Zealand where there is virtually no orthodox presence. Therefore your orthodox bishops would label my church not of God, and therefore of Satan, correct?
I’m not here to start a war. From our conversation I can sense you truly are my brother in Christ, and I love you and hope to meet you after this life is all over and have a good laugh.
While I appreciate and believe a lot of the content of your post, you are twisting some Scriptures to say New Age things that simply do not carry that meaning in the text and context.
You rightly say that humans are fallible and sinners, yet confidently proclaim that you are definitely correct and KJ is wrong. I hope you can see the irony in that
Can you give me an example?
I do not believe one can point to any one church and say "This is the true church". Frankly, most of those who judge in such a way have only done enough studies to "prove themselves correct", rather than taking an unbiased approach to the whole subject matter. I am familiar with Trenham’s material, as I felt it was the strongest ‘Ironman’ argument for Orthodoxy and approached it with a humble heart.
One example of an error in Orthodox doctrine is that no Bishop is married within the Orthodox Church, though you do find the occassional Priest who is married within the church. The reason you do not find any Bishops married and only a few Priests married is because of their approach to theology. With the Apostle Paul's commands to Deacons and Bishops we find the scripture to say that a Bishop is "to be husband to one wife". They read this as a prohibition against polygamy, rather than a commandment for the Bishop to be married. As a result of their belief that it is to steer Bishops away from polygamy, they go a step further and only allow non-married men to become Bishops. This is unscriptural and even hinted at by Paul to be a doctrine of devils (1 Tim 4 forbidding marriage).
Orthodox also teach that baptism is for remission of sins, which is a dispensational error that arises from not rightly dividing the Scriptures. (2 Tim 2:15)
Out of curiosity, would you say that because the leader of my church was not ordained by a Greek Orthodox bishop, that we are no church of God?
What’s his name so I can avoid him?