"Demanding that wages for elected officials be capped at the median salary of their district" I agree with this one and I've been saying it for years. State and local elected "officials" like city managers and school superintendents, mayors, and so on too.
Yeah I remember granny over the cliff. I was just slamming Paul Ryan in general. I sometimes joke about Chuck Schumer saying this Armageddon is going to kill us all worse than the last Armageddon that killed us all. You are absolutely right they've been using the same fear porn line for over 20 years.
It's paid on behalf of the employee and it is for the employees benefit. Equal protection under the law dictates that one shouldn't be discriminated against because of one's financial status anymore than for one's color.
Real critical thinking might lead one to understand that Popeye is a cartoon and could live off tree bark if he was drawn that way.
Yes, the bbb=666 thing is pure grasping. Fake News isn't news just because it is presented as real or believed to be true, and in that same way some straws that are grasped at aren't even straws at all no matter how much it is believed that they are. bbb may equal 666 in some equation somewhere, but neither Build Back Better or Big Beautiful Bill is written with a small 'b', and three sixes side by side is just that and nothing related to the Bible number of six hundred threescore and six.
The millions of other pieces of evidence you refer to is often in that same category. 1000,000,000 voices all saying 2+2=5 is meaningless noise. Unnecessary clutter in a search for truth.
There is no need to "bring me around". If I wasn't awake and aware as much as I am I wouldn't notice the bullshit, let alone call it out for what I think it is. Perhaps you need to be brought around to critical thinking and common sense analysis? I say that tongue in cheek and no offense meant, but still...
Anyway, neither of the two scenarios you presented here are hard to believe. Without proof though we do ourselves a disservice to believe them to the point they become dogma, and neither of them one way or another have a damn thing to do with what I said about the silliness (at best) of making stuff up to fit what some might want to believe concerning the numbers/symbolism/666 thing.
Right along with that are the timestamps are important angle. Who's timestamps? Anybody's? Some seem to think so, I don't.
Another twist is that if 3:00 PM (for example)doesn't correspond with a favorable Q drop they will just convert it to military time of 1500 hours and see what drop 1500 says. Ugh.
Again, the confirmation bias must be set aside if one is to honestly analyze anything diligently.
I've never fallen in with the baloney side of Q analysis, whether it be outrageous flights of numerical fancy, Serial Brain II with his assertions about the 'Maestro', or anything in-between, and I'm not going to start now.
I did look closely at that website some time ago. I can't remember why I didn't give it much credence at the time, but I'll take another look, and thanks for the reminder.
I'm not arguing that there are no symbols that will be the downfall of the baddies, and of course there is a web of interrelated actions and signs in such numbers that while not mathematically impossible is certainly mathematically improbable concerning them, but that could also be said about building a Buick.
What I am arguing about here is the grasping at straws that aren't even straws in order to construct a desired finding. Confirmation bias instead of critical thought.
I don't blame anyone (including myself) for being a conspiracy theorist. There certainly are conspiracies both between the baddies and among the goodies. We know there are, and the theories are speculation of how and what the conspiracy is all about. To me it isn't really the pejorative that the CIA wanted it to be.
See, that's just it. Why divide? Why not add like they usually do in Gematria circles? Why not subtract 2020 from 30330, or multiply it?
IMO the arbitrary use of 'rules' or 'methods' to force an outcome (which itself is also meaningless) is the opposite of critical thinking. It doesn't help anything or 'decode' anything, it only clouds an already difficult issue with clutter and confusion.
In what world do the letters BBB equal six hundred and sixty six?
No offense meant here at all, but I think this kind of thing falls somewhere between bullshit and silly with maybe a dash of superstition thrown in.
If the letter "B" was meant to be a substitute for the number six, the most one could come up with would be three number sixes side by side. Even added together the sum would only be 18, a far cry from six hundred threescore and six the Bible describes.
God the Father did. He so loved the world that he sent his only begotten son to be a sacrifice for sin.
The Bible says in 1 Peter 1:20 that Jesus was crucified before the foundation of the world but was made manifest in these last times for you.
In Revelation 13: 8 the Bible says ..."and all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world."
No doubt some Jewish religious sects wanted Jesus killed and they tried to kill him even before the cross, but he laid down his life for his friends and those that would believe on him through their word. It was the Romans that killed him physically but only because God gave them that power, and it was Jesus that said that, not me.
The word of God is forever and no matter how much one may hate "Jews" it won't change the Gospel truth.
The death and resurrection of Jesus is quite different from the country of Israel and its politicians. I think people that can't (or won't) see the difference don't understand either one very well.
I corrected you a bit about the Gospel of Jesus Christ. You are too ignorant to see that and just move on so you have to keep going, making things up as you go. I was right to say you are a Democrat, or at least acting like one.
If you want to discredit Jesus and border on blasphemy towards God that's on you.
I'm done with your ignorance and won't be responding to you on this any further.
We already have other parties. Trump was a Democrat, considered a run for POTUS as a Reform Party candidate in 2000, and finally joined the Republican Party.
Then there's the Green Party, the Constitution Party, the Libertarian Party, and for a huge chunk of Congress, the Communist Party.
Also, I don't want to live in a Democracy either. Musk should know that's mob rule, the same as the uni-party.