Hehe I seem to recall the idea floating around here, anything is possible.
In my opinion these are the wonder years, Q is the anonymous faceless collective saving the world.
I think there will come a time when we will know the full teams faces, and Trump will officially endorse and “kick this thing off” in the public sphere.
I can’t find the post don’t even ask I’ve tried, but I could have swore I remember a specific post which seemed to outright ensure us that Trump and the entire Q team would eventually put their names out there.
Specifically I remember this detail so much because of the thought process for me that followed.
Edit: however perhaps it was this that assured me, I could have sworn it was a much more direct post, in that they would definitely all identify as Q team in end.
“Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here.”
That’s so funny I just wrote a little post above about my feelings of operator plural or not and cited this very example.
It was hard to explain my interpretation and took a good second but it popped up quick as an example.
Surely there are many more examples of this if we really look at it, so many moving parts, and many many many of them revolving around US Military.
This presumably would be the operators that are not 1 of less than 10, but still were dialed into specific missions.
Why would they go out of their way to specify both genders then with the logic of grammar, and not just say “their”
I’m with the operator is plural camp.
The way I take it is think of like that time all the black hawks landed in LA and extracted something.
“Dialed in with orders” “specific to their mission”
IE those helicopter pilots and raid team had to have been told at least WHAT they were doing and WHY they were landing in LA.
Let’s say it was some prominent person they were after, surely they would have to be clued in as to WHY they were raiding with military arms, for example let’s say Hillary Clinton.
Another example might be the Las Vegas night. This is just my take.
It’s very interesting however that you point out this often glanced over portion of a very famous Q post, and the implications are still rather interesting regardless of this one detail IMO!
You’re right, Q has told us many times Trump will eventually endorse openly, and I even remember posts stating specifically that the entire Q team will eventually disclose their identity as well.
Of course there will be book deals, movie deals, epic media in a totally transitioned industry, I think the Flynn biopic could be one of the first of this genre.
But I never once thought about the potential “behind the scenes” moments that could be disclosed, this is essentially what Q has already provided us so I imagine there is much more that wasn’t related to the posts that was captured.
I imagine perhaps there will be “Bin Laden” type raid footage of Trump and some generals gathered around a monitor laughing and eating popcorn, except replaced Bin Laden with his PUPPET MASTERS IE Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden, Soros, Schwab, and many more!
Sadly Q tells us for preservation of the republic we won’t be told of every execution, IE many “health problems” will come swift and many politicians and “elites” I’ll seemingly dissapear…
Me too Anon.
Who would have thought for four years we watched them pour countless man hours, MONEY $$$, time slots, to SMEARING Q!
We waited eagerly for them to ask the question.
Even I who was told by Q they would surely answer the question if asked directly and honestly and would solve the entire puzzle, believed Trump SURELY HAD TO ENDORSE Q or risk the devestating blow to moral….
What could be better than that!?!?
Then when they loaded the Q question with as much vitriol and anger as they could…..
“IS THAT SUPPOSED TO BE A BAD THING!?!”
….. that reporter froze in her tracks after believing she was about to get her big break in the industry and put the final nail in Q…..
WELL GEE…. I guess when you put it that way, this whole Q thing DOESN’T seem so bad after all! 🤣
Uh yes… but you know what they have been seeing? Everything else.
You know what they do talk about on social media? Epstein Island, Diddy, the industry mafia/illuminati, Ellen, balenciaga, wayfair, etc…
Sometimes you must “show” them….
Will Trump and Q team finally confirm? I believe so.
Still the ending won’t be for everyone, don’t expect a photo finish line. Will people inevitably go back/journalists will be forced to go back and sort through these obvious posts and retract their fanatical claims that Trump flamed a conspiracy? I think, essentially in some way or another they will be forced to eat crow.
This is as Q has pointed out a huge toxic pill for the media. Trump is literally waving his arms for four years saying I’M Q, Q CLAIMS TO BE ME! DON’T YOU WANT TO ASK THE QUESTION?!
NO they couldn’t face it… they had to commit false flags, terror, smears painting Q movement as the single biggest threat to DEMOCRACY ITSELF…. THEN…. LEADING INTO THE BIG BIDEN DEBATE WE WILL GET HIM…. BOOM! HE WILL HAVE TO ENDORSE FOR HIS Q FOLLOWING, OTHERWISE Q IS TOAST! …..
See my post above ^
"Well I haven't heard that, but is that supposed to be a bad thing or a good thing?"
For those who’ve committed high treason, and their heads on the line, I think this technicality is the least of their troubles..
Qanon? Secretly saving the world from a Satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibal elites? What’s that!?!
"Well I haven't heard that, but is that supposed to be a bad thing or a good thing?"
"And we are actually. We're saving the world from a radical left philosophy that will destroy this country, and when this country is gone, the rest of the world would follow."
False Flag, Rainbow Flag, Ukraine Flag, Confederate Flag, Antifa Flag, BLM Flag, ISIS Flag, White Flag, Black Flag…..
In a world full of flags….. THERE IS #1 🇺🇸
The thing is I’m loving how the left is being used to portray the “Nazis” to point out Israeli hypocrisy and corruption.
When did the left become the muh anti joo! That was supposed to the the MAGA alt right! 🤣
Also important to note suddenly the detectives have anon like skills in comparing tents and calling out professional agitators!
That’s a big word for the news to be throwing around, when do you hear the news ever suggest ANY side be it blm/antifa or the proud boys or those white mask fed bois as….
PROFESSIONAL AGITATORS! That word is taboo to the media it never can happen! Because that would equal a money trail!
Think people won’t notice the contrast in taking down Palestine protestors vs armed takeovers of US streets and cities for an ENTIRE SUMMER OF LOVE?
Oh vey!
It’s hard to tell if you are genuine or not in asking, because simple logic could answer your question in so many ways.
For example, I could think of ways Q could be bad and things could be horrible, the same way as I can think of why maybe it had to be this way, and the shift in public perception.
Did you think 20 years ago when Bush knocked down the towers and we eagerly waited each week to see which cave CIA Bin Laden was preaching from….
That you would see the likes of Trump Flynn and heck, even an anonymous high level insider providing a once in a lifetime intel drop to the masses on the deepest of rabbit hole corruption, in the mainstream openly calling out these war pigs to their faces? The likes of Obama and Bush?
Did you think you would have Flynn and Trump and MTG going on record that we are “saving the world from evil satanic pedo Kabal?”
Heck, other than let’s roll did you see mainstream media called out for war crimes and treason?
Did you see people pointing out and fully awaken too subtle symbolism and programming?
NWO, Illuminati, and Satan all in the common man’s dictionary and arsenal against Evil?
See above, this is a common tactic surely. The video I’ve seen though the suspect is there to meet children, and produced a firearm when encountered by uniformed officers.
They even begin wrestling after seeing him draw in an attempt to subdue, I believe even shots fire off from his gun and they are forced either way to back off and end the threat.
If this was the same video I saw aren’t the cops waiting behind door, opens up thinking he is seeing young children, and proceeds to produce a firearm?
I’m not saying that isn’t their MO, just not as cut n dry as execution.
Also the video seems to imply there was a long standing record of vile obvious behaviors and law encounters, which he suggests might have been covered up by higher ups.
Also in this video he produced said gun almost like Clint Eastwood, and the cops seem to even give him benefit of him withdrawing it as they try to move in and physically restrain him from drawing, a shot goes off from his gun, and either way they are forced to back off and fire.
At that point shots are going off and they are all crowded ontop of him, if any gun goes off again they are screwed. Was actually impressed with the control they all handled.
Seems to me he wasn’t willing to do the time and was ready for suicide by cop if it came to it.
Just looked again, to go along with the blatant one eye symbolism..
Does it seem like the black girl in the bg has some sort of pink face paint on her left eye side? Looks to thick and below the hairline to be hair.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BDLo_HQCIAA9YKG?format=jpg&name=small
Is this related to recent clips I saw of Tucker / Rohan talking about a Project Aqua?
When Tucker speaks, it’s one of the view voices I listen. And since leaving F News he has not held back, he really said let me talk about what nobody is allowed to validate!
Was meaning to find the rest of the clip, was pretty complex stuff but these are the questions humanity has begged for decades.
If it’s a strategic advantage, of course they would hide from us!
Fist bumps? Love em! But we are way past that!
Didn’t Trump just post DO IT Q & NCSWIC 🤣