20
GuessWhat 20 points ago +20 / -0

You should've told him Fauci recommended all of the warranty and insurance options. He probably would've paid for everything.

7
GuessWhat 7 points ago +7 / -0

What does this mean? Does it mean articles are randomly being generated/updated through AI to push that information?

2
GuessWhat 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. If this is actually happening, how many of these people got the vax?

2
GuessWhat 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would classify this as a nothing burger. Executives at companies typically get shares of stock either through grants or options. It's part of their salaries. As soon as those stocks are vested they typically move them especially if the company is doing well. It's a constant cycle of selling as they vest over time.

1
GuessWhat 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.freep.com/story/news/health/2020/06/24/michigan-gets-less-per-patient-than-other-states-federal-cares-act-covid-relief/3246835001/

Michigan got almost $130,000 less per patient than the national average, according to the report, which analyzed CARES Act funds and coronavirus case counts as of April 10.

While the national average in federal assistance per patient was $160,286, Michigan’s allotment was just $31,045 per patient.

By comparison, Hawaii got $299,855 per patient; Montana’s allotment was $305,488 per patient. North Dakota’s hospitals got $327,570 per patient, according to the report.

2
GuessWhat 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was going to make this exact same comment. When you're in trials you always have a control group. That group thinks they got something but really didn't.

1
GuessWhat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who really knows what's happening to these people though? We'll never get "information" on it. For all we know these could be fake crashes and clowns are riding off into the sunset to another Epstein island somewhere else.

2
GuessWhat 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't even with that. There were still idiots trying to argue that what he was posting was different. You can't fix crazy.

12
GuessWhat 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is why they didn't want to give it to the elderly first. They were going to start dropping dead immediately from the vaccine, while younger people would fight it off for a period of time.

5
GuessWhat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sorry for the length of this response.

I disagree, I believe this is up for debate. 11.3 in the War Manual is clearly referencing the end of occupation. And to be honest we are being occupied, and not by our own military. It also refers to the end of occupied territory. It does not say, country, state, county, city, federal city. It says territory. It even gives an example of when the occupying power no longer has the territory under control. “Belligerent occupation ends when the Occupying Power no longer has effectively placed the occupied territory under its control. For example, an uprising by the local population may prevent the Occupying Power from actually enforcing its authority over occupied territory. Similarly, the Occupying Power’s expulsion or complete withdrawal from the territory would also suffice because the former Occupying Power generally would not be able to control sufficiently the occupied territory.” This happened when thousands of protesters went to the capitol and forced the DC police and congress out of the capitol. Something else to think about. If a foreign country is occupying DC, it can basically run the country by controlling the federal government. We’re all in agreement that congress has been bought by the CCP. This isn’t up for debate. Here’s where other examples in the War Manual start making sense. In section 11.2.4 “Proclamation of Occupation” says: “The question of whether territory is occupied does not depend upon the issuance of any particular proclamation or other instrument. Territory may be occupied even though no proclamation of occupation has been issued. Conversely, the issuance of proclamation of occupation does not empower a State with the rights of an Occupying Power if it does not control such territory in fact.”

In essence, we can be occupied without even knowing it. The occupying power does not have to tell you that you’re under their rule.

Another example. What is happening in with the media, big tech, professional sports, Hollywood, the government and our federal courts can be contributed to be occupied by a foreign power.

“11.7.2 Censorship and Other Regulation of the Media. Under the law of belligerent occupation, for the purposes of security, an Occupying Power may establish censorship or regulation of any or all forms of media (e.g., press, radio, television) and entertainment (e.g., theater, movies), of correspondence, and of other means of communication. For example, an Occupying Power may prohibit entirely the publication of newspapers that pose a threat to security, or it may prescribe regulations for the publication or circulation of newspapers of other media for the purpose of fulfilling its obligations to restore public order.”

This is why we’re being censored. Our constitution is not protecting us and being ignored because we are being occupied.

So much more makes sense reading this document. Which I believe is why Trump said he is returning power to the people.

view more: ‹ Prev