3
Immysteryman 3 points ago +3 / -0

We already have GITMO ready to roll. No need.

1
Immysteryman 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean the defecting members of the TX legislature

1
Immysteryman 1 point ago +1 / -0

He is giving the Chinese guy the Hawaiian good luck sign in the pic on the left. Did anyone find that curious/contradictory/hilarious?

1
Immysteryman 1 point ago +2 / -1

They claim the proof is in the paper and that you watch every step of the process. Unless there is ballot adjudication.

5
Immysteryman 5 points ago +5 / -0

I want to see how many of the 160k were wrongly flipped to Xiden

1
Immysteryman 1 point ago +1 / -0

This guy is a BEAST! I love it.

2
Immysteryman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I play Trump speeches all day for it 🤣🤣🤣

4
Immysteryman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Longest five years of my life was 3rd grade.....

1
Immysteryman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Vinny Gambini: I object to this witness being called at this time. We’ve been given no prior notice he’d testify. No discovery of any tests he’s conducted or reports he’s prepared. And as the court is aware, the defense is entitled to advance notice of any witness who will testify, particularly those who will give scientific evidence, so that we may properly prepare for cross-examination, as well as give the defense an opportunity to have the witness’s reports reviewed by a defense expert, who might then be in a position to contradict the veracity of his conclusions. Judge Chamberlain Haller: Mr. Gambini? Vinny Gambini: Yes sir? Judge Chamberlain Haller: Mr. Gambini, that is a lucid, well thought-out, intelligent objection. Vinny Gambini: Thank you. Judge Chamberlain Haller: Overruled

3
Immysteryman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well if you type into Gaggle Trump lawsuit against Twitter you immediately pull up a bunch of articles talking about how the lawyers are laughing at it because it's soooo ridiculous. I actually read the Complaint (Lawyer Fag here) and it's not ridiculous at all, especially in light of Justice Thomas' opinion denying cert. to the case against Trump by the firm that brought suit on behalf of the seven people that were banned from his Twatter account. So, unless the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals and Justice Thomas are "ridiculous" then it's probably a pretty decent lawsuit. There's precedent for it. :)

5
Immysteryman 5 points ago +5 / -0

One of the things necessary for a class to proceed is commonality. If damages vary - no commonality. If injuries vary, no commonality. Here, the same info was blocked and people banned for IDENTICAL (My Cousin Vinny) messages. That’s commonality. I agree with poster - Trump played them

3
Immysteryman 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s called an insider working with the commies

4
Immysteryman 4 points ago +4 / -0

DOWN DOOTS GALORE!!!

1
Immysteryman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oooooh. ATOMIC SCIENTISTS!!! They must be sooooo smart! They are surely capable of accurately quantifying “QAnons” degree of anti-semitism. No mere mortal could do that. It takes an ATOMIC SCIENTIST!!,

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›