9
Kampfer 9 points ago +9 / -0

They are literally saying the opposite tonight: "the 2022 mid-term elections are a referendum against election deniers."

3
Kampfer 3 points ago +3 / -0

No Red Wave.

Biden mid term election performed better than expected for Dems.

1
Kampfer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would you prefer links to the NY Times, The Wall Street Journal, ABC News, The Guardian, The Hill, The Independen, etc.?

They are also reporting the story.

1
Kampfer 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is a nice rabbit hole: Melito was so 2nd Century.

Before Melito, in the 1st century, Peter and Paul were referring to the "Scriptures". They knew what it was before Melito.

Left brain, right brain is irrelevant in accepting the truth of Scripture.

And...to the point, Q drops don't interpret the Bible.

0
Kampfer 0 points ago +1 / -1

I am not echo controlled or digitally controlled, not even by the digital or echo forces here.

-1
Kampfer -1 points ago +1 / -2

Political truths and the truth of the Gospel are not the same thing.

-1
Kampfer -1 points ago +1 / -2

No, not at all.

I am saying that the only proper way to interpret Scripture is through grammatical, historical context.

And...I am saying that Q drops can't be utilized to interpret Scripture. (I would submit that the drops don't even suggest such a thing. Can you cite a drop that suggests it?)

And...Scripture is truth. Q drops and the Q plan, as stated, are dependent on disinformation ("disinformation is necessary" is the antithesis of Biblical truth).

Moreover, from what I have often seen happen here with the spiritualization of Q drops is that it leads to Universalim instead of Christianity (all faiths are equal and Christ is not the only way to salvation).

-1
Kampfer -1 points ago +1 / -2

Stating that folks pointing to Scripture will get other folks thinking towards biblical truth is wholly different than stating that Q drops can be used to interpret Scripture. They can't.

0
Kampfer 0 points ago +1 / -1

“Now I would remind you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you received, in which you stand, and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you – unless you believed in vain. For I deliver to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that He was buried, that He was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then He appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep” (1 Cor. 15:1-6)

0
Kampfer 0 points ago +1 / -1

66 From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him.

67 “You do not want to leave too, do you?” Jesus asked the Twelve.

68 Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69 We have come to believe and to know that you are the Holy One of God.”

(John 6:66-68)

Most folks want a Jesus of their own-making, maybe like a "Q post Jesus", but not the real One. The masses leave the real Jesus when they hear his tough teachings and His clear commands.

-1
Kampfer -1 points ago +1 / -2

Most anyone can draw a crowd.

The masses here followed the likes of SerialBrain2 and others that spewed nothing, but disinformation. They gobbled it up, repeated ad nauseum and defended it tooth and nail.

The masses believe anything.

The simple Gospel divides. It is truth. To those who are perishing, it has the stench of death, but to those who believe it has the sweet aroma of life.

-1
Kampfer -1 points ago +1 / -2

Hermeneutics is the proper way to interpret scripture and it doesn't include drops (just grammatical and historical context).

The Gospel is the vehicle to bring people to Christ.

Nobody even knows what the Q plan is. It, as stated, includes that disinformation is necessary, so good luck. Folks have thrown their best decodes/guesses at it for the last 4 years and have gotten it absolutely wrong...not even close.

You appear to be talking two different things: Interpretation of the Bible is one thing (and can only properly be done with a grammatical, historical context); the drawing of those to Christ, which is another.

0
Kampfer 0 points ago +2 / -2

If you are looking to Q drops to interpret Scripture, then you are involved in something other than Christianity.

Christianity doesn't need Q or Q drops.

There is no disinformation necessary in the Bible.

1
Kampfer 1 point ago +3 / -2

Good grief. They aren't.

A proper hermeneutic needs only grammatical and historical context.

With those two things, you will understand biblical passages.

(no drops necessary)

0
Kampfer 0 points ago +1 / -1

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-epps-dominion-idUSL1N2Z91V2

Why is Q+ asking the question when the issue has been addressed and no link can be found between Dominion Enterprises and Dominion Voting Systems?

What does it mean if Q+ is asking this question?

view more: Next ›