4
LockHerUp17 4 points ago +5 / -1

This is something that is present in a lot of pagan rituals. Intention is everything, and one way to show intent is to use symbols out in the open.

Another tie in is how vampires historically have had a rule that they need permission to enter your house. These people drink the blood of children, putting them right there with vampires.

by BQnita
1
LockHerUp17 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it was like 2 years ago where Trump released a video on twitter saying to declassify all the obama docs and hillary emails and then even said: "Yup it's happening". Balls are still blue from that day.

7
LockHerUp17 7 points ago +8 / -1

What's "too far" (and frankly, VERY telling) is how many articles the media has released "debunking" this as a wrinkle. Right over the target

14
LockHerUp17 14 points ago +14 / -0

I wouldn't put it past them to stage a fake North Korea threat or something that makes Biden look dangerous for America. Then military comes in?

by Evspra
3
LockHerUp17 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah that's fair, they seem hella sus now after having read everything

by Evspra
1
LockHerUp17 1 point ago +1 / -0

So the DOD clearance they have alleged to have, is fake? Idk, seems like this might be a bit premature.

4
LockHerUp17 4 points ago +4 / -0

Smartmantic had a tweet from around 2017 about securing elections in Myanmar

14
LockHerUp17 14 points ago +14 / -0

ALT TECH ALT RIGHT XTREME SOCIAL MEDIA BANNED GROUPS WHITE SUPREMACISTS

4
LockHerUp17 4 points ago +6 / -2

I took this plus the following post that said there are bad actors lurking in the group to mean 2 possibilities:

  1. Anons have date fagged correct dates, and without trying to directly draw attention to this potential problem, GEORGE news is nudging anons to stop date fagging.

  2. Bad actors in the group are date fagging incorrect dates to mess with anons and demoralize the group (not as likely IMO)

2
LockHerUp17 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's reading shit like this that makes me so happy I am not married to someone that needs red pilling. I'd fucking lose it.

2
LockHerUp17 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like this. Just another wormhole for people to find Q and the plan "on their own". Makes sense why George News would link to Kim Clement as well.

7
LockHerUp17 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah, honestly this guy posts spicy pics with Q stuff with red arrows all over it all the time, but he's an absolute idiot. Also how was Biden replaced in 2019 when visually, the last time we saw "old Joe" was August of 2017?

1
LockHerUp17 1 point ago +1 / -0

When the Talmud was written? Idk by historians and archeologists who date these things. I am not trying to spread any fake news, I am just saying that historians trace the Talmud back when Babylonians invaded Jerusalem. Before that, Judaism was word of mouth

1
LockHerUp17 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's annoying that many things will probably never be fully declassed and revealed go give us peace of mind but I hope it will get to a point where it won't matter

9
LockHerUp17 9 points ago +9 / -0

I am willing to swear I saw flurries when Hunter came out "live". If anyone else wants to chime in. I'm local but not in DC and it was snowing at the same time too.

2
LockHerUp17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Post 3585

Project LOOKING GLASS? Going Forward in Order to Look Back.

Q

Doesn't sound like an aircraft to me.

4
LockHerUp17 4 points ago +4 / -0

3585

Project LOOKING GLASS? Going Forward in Order to Look Back. Q

https://www.bitchute.com/video/x89kaiHX36vR/

10
LockHerUp17 10 points ago +11 / -1

Project Looking Glass was directly brought up by Q. It is (allegedly) a very advanced machine that is essentially a reverse engineered pineal gland. When used, it shows the operator the most likely future series of events at the given time.

Crazy, but the crazier thing is that I first heard about Looking Glass technology 8 years ago from David Wilcock

11
LockHerUp17 11 points ago +11 / -0

Because this guy literally said "i don't even know what I'm signing". She has to make sure he goes through with this shit.

1
LockHerUp17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never said I agreed with other anons, just made a comment showing others what I've read anons say about the Q statement on it

1
LockHerUp17 1 point ago +2 / -1

Anons are relentless. The reasonings I've seen thus far are both that he was asked about JFK Jr (wouldn't be jr anymore bc his father is dead), and the classic "disinformation is necessary".

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›