3
merf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fight fight fight is EVERYWHERE in Q. Very common phrase. 2190 he does the fist gesture too. Great connections!

u/#q2190

4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

After a day's review I suspect pretty strongly that it was a staged white hat op...

Massive security failure was necessary.

Shot fired across the field of view to an area where people wouldn't be filming in a position,

Position of shot was perfect for Trump to use a blood packet.

Tiny female Secret Service agent positioned perfectly for cameraman to take a heroic picture of Trump after the shooting.

Witness seeded to do the BBC interview to set the narrative that it was a security failure (this will be used to awaken people that SS/FBI can be corrupt, treasonous and that prior shooting may not have been lone gunmen).

Press had no narrative to run with for hours (seems they are going with attempted assassination finally). No programming was prepared so media was likely not in on it. You must recall how ridiculous the initial headlines were.

Victims coincidentally seem to be tied to Ronny Jackson (yes, the Ronny Jackson that was Trump's doctor). Just the type of people you would want involved who could keep a secret w/respect to the deaths & injuries during the event.


When it first happened someone suggested this to me and I was too emotionally hot to consider it, but after careful review I think any frosty anon would come to the conclusion that this was white-hat orchestrated, esp. w/a Q proof this solid...

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Possible. I think it'll become more clear as we see how the various players react to & benefit from the news.

Hopefully provides a relief valve for the Americans who have succumbed to hate programming after nearly ten years...

The "medical emergency" and "no water" comms that were being dropped throughout the day were interesting.. Not sure if they were typical political rhetoric or indications of needing info (no water/no information).

https://twitter.com/harryjsisson/status/1812234403835191803

https://twitter.com/SassiestMinx/status/1812244092346130940

https://twitter.com/MacFarlaneNews/status/1812207859918381478

6
merf 6 points ago +6 / -0

Interesting that he used the term "legacy media". I've seen a handful of folks use and I enjoy it myself.

The assets are flipping so quickly I can't even track who's pushing what at this point...

18
merf 18 points ago +18 / -0

It's a good metric to check for and these seem like positive indications.

I don't think the journals fixing themselves would be the endgame the white hats are looking for though. Their mechanisms are clearly antithetical to science, and way too many "scientists" exhibit a casting couch level of desperation when it comes to getting published.

There needs to be a public exposure and fallout of the journal and grant systems, with AGs working across state lines to bring those involved to trial.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't vouch for it one way or the other but some ideas to consider from Ellie Phillips.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcMTcm6wIIU

1
merf 1 point ago +1 / -0

I enjoy the blue anon version of the left because they're exercising skepticism and independent thinking. They're quite fun to engage with if one accepts their ridiculous assumptions.

There is strong loyalty to Joe right now because there was zero narrative offramp programming (if anything there was a hyperabundance of programming to hold the line w/Joe).

Put down your coffee before you read this and enjoy a hearty chuckle frens:

https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=19109630

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xVQ5GXHhl58g2cE35g11llVAUuCQ8Tqa4suUlUEq0DA/edit

I've saved a PDF if they pull it down. This was my favorite line:

Fear of racism/sexism is playing an outsized role not supported by the data..

^ i.e. The racism/sexism that we've been scaring you about and bullying our political opponents with doesn't exist. 🤣🤣🤣

13
merf 13 points ago +13 / -0

This is a great review fren. The parallels to the scamdemic are eerie (problem/solution) and it's easy to imagine Hillary in Trump's place declaring that a nationwide vaccine mandate are required to re-open the country after multiple years of lockdowns...

We truly were saved by Trump and the white hats and a small swath of Patriots in the population and not nearly enough fully appreciate that.

And another parallel are the 2008 bailouts where prosecution of fraud was never even considered--only bailouts. The rhetoric is the same here in 1933: the fraud of the banks is not considered--only stealing from the people to keep them open.

===

Why did the War Powers under Trading with the Enemy act had to be expanded to peacetime as part of Emergency Banking Act ?

Were war powers needed to perform the confiscations and create the obligations? i.e. Would the entity collapse if the war powers were removed?

===

My question: is this same war power extended into peace time what Trump is using to confiscate property from persons involved in child trafficking?

3
merf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some controls like saline or intravenous vitamin C would have been great to have as a baseline for understanding the significance of whatever it was we were seeing.

It's not at all surprising that squirting a pile of something into blood changes it...

3
merf 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Chinese Chechnya."

Interesting that they were apparently able to monitor and avoid what I suppose we had nurtured in Chechnya?

by raxlore
5
merf 5 points ago +5 / -0

Campaign is announcing an ad blitz coming up shortly.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4755829-biden-campaign-ad-blitz-voter-outreach/

Spending the money before the big donors can demand a refund. 🤣🤣

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

All good fren, she has a big enough presence and reputation that it was worth sharing.

4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's weird that everyone backs the claim that the guy has a lifelong stutter as I've never actually heard him stutter once.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was a TikTok video a while back showing military members being asked why they joined and citizenship benefits came up an awful lot. Forms N-400 & N-426 and you're golden.

We know that these higher level degrees can essentially be bought. Million dollar donation and sufficient test scores and you're in.

It's a grand slam for the cabal. They get staff for their military invasions. USA is weakened through infiltration and disloyalty. Citizens pay for it all and confidence in our institutions is destroyed.

7
merf 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's my understanding, though refunds seem like a plausible workaround that might work. There would have to be a willingness on the part of the campaign to refund the money. Folks in Biden's circle wouldn't want that (absent some guarantees that they'd continue to be taken care of).

https://democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1002

The Democrat lifers are rightfully restless and distrustful about all this. They've cancelled NYT, MSNBC, and other "right" wing outlets over this (seriously). Not sure exactly where they plan to go though because all of their safe spaces have gone anti-Biden overnight.

And even among those die-hards who are maintaining a positive spin on Biden, the fundraising dried up:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219095960

This definitely puts the process for the 2024 steal in a strange spot.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does make one wonder. Diamonds?

Blocked or injunction allowed in:

  • Texas: Amawi v. Pflugerville Independent School District (2021)

  • Kansas: Koontz v. Watson (2018)

  • Abby Martin v. Georgia Southern University (2021)

Allowed (but challenged) in:

  • Arkansas Times LP v. Waldrip (2021)

The trend seems pretty solidly in favor of it being made illegal... Might not get to the SC. I'd hold your ground if you're feeling like your arm is twisted on this.

1
merf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Within the Q posts is there not a catalogue of ostensive definitions--gradually built up and improved over multiple years--which we now utilize and apply to current and historical events?

Isn't my post just imitating the classic Q timestamp & date conventions and applying them to a communication from an agency (Secret Service) that is known to be linked to Q?

Am I not just a sort of child mimicking my parents (Q & the anons) and trying to speak their language--sometimes succeeding and sometimes failing?

Bear in mind, I am just a few years old when it comms to this. I have to practice to get better.

4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's also completely irrelevant to the office she's seeking.

I would probably buy in if she were running for Sheriff or Governor or even a legislative position, but this kind of directionless bombast isn't necessary for SoS.

Her job would be to run the election and keep records and she seems completely oblivious to that..

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you follow any of their personal links you'll see their full last name is Gomez Noriega.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›