Some of you have been pointing fingers at some of us who have been listening to some other people who keep saying an "alien" problem was going to develop. I shrugged it off as a border issue (illegal aliens) and closed my ears to the "crazy" talk, but I think those 'crazy" people were trying to tell us something. I don't believe in aliens from other planets, but I believe they can make it appear that way. I've seen Independence Day. And when that movie ended, the world was free and everyone was happy. I say let them bring on the aliens, and we'll let the Big Foots march out of the woods to be our Storm Troopers.
My first thought this morning was "They're rewarding all those evil-doers for holding their line." I can't wait until those who have oppressed, those who have lied to us, those who have controlled us, who committed treason against the people in a country where the people are supposed to be free, all of this done against the people of this great nation--I can't wait for them to pay." I HATE betrayal, and I will delight when their betrayal puts an end to them. Yeah, it's morning. I'm not a morning person. But more than ever, I'm as mad as hell.
They can have my Telegram account. It is worthless. You can't tell who is who and who really has the important news.
Whether or not you believe Simon Parkes, there is always truth that can be gleaned and backed up with things we are learning for all sources. I've been listening to videos on NESARA and GESARA. Seems to me both Charlie Ward and Simon are on the right track in that regard. I don't even follow Praying Medic and X22 without skepticism. I agree with much of what they say, but sometimes, I have to back off and really look into details for myself. That's called logical thinking. Listen to others and discern fact from fiction. And the name calling some are doing is really a problem with every aspect of society and with this forum. The art of speech has broken down into curt, ugly responses. Why not try to be a little civil? Or is that a little too hard for some self-centered know-it-alls?
He sure is doing his best to red pill folks, isn't he? My favorite Q line, "These people are stupid" comes to mind almost hourly these days.
But they won't expel the American-hating, Islamist terrorists? They are truly unbelievable. Dear Lord, give us back our Republic, please.
This is shoddy reporting. Anyone in the U.S. can own stocks. That looks like a schedule for his taxes. Someone would have to link him to a direct knowledge, and the amounts are paltry. I'm not saying he isn't crooked. I'm saying the reporter is using innuendo and not journalism. Give us facts.
No, I didn't think that. I thought the moderators would be doing a quicker job, and I did forget to block (my fault). However, it would be nice if some people would learn to have a hospitable, civilized conversation. You may not see a person face-to-face, but you can respond as a human being one to another, especially if that person didn't say anything to attack you. It takes the same amount and some times fewer words to have a polite conversation. But I do appreciate the information. Thank you very much.
I've deported one person several times this morning. I wish I understood the logistics of it since it doesn't seem to deport them. But the button is there. Whether it is working or not, I have no idea.
I think we can all have differing opinions. Proof for me would be a valid source and to see the handcuffs.
Oh, and the gang-up-on-'em-even-though-we-have-no reason mentality doesn't just seem to be only an Antifa or a BLM problem. One person types a negative response and how many add to it without knowing a thing about what's going on. Please: Think. For. Yourselves.
I am always appalled at how the art of sarcasm has been lost on most people. Are we becoming Sheldon Coopers? Do you need a "sarcasm" sign for when someone is basically using what is happening to tell you what shouldn't be happening? Instead, the "F" word and name calling is the first thing you type. Context is important gang. Humor via sarcasm is a great way of dealing with issues. Rubio isn't saying these things as if he's on board. He's telling you, via sarcasm, that we're on a slippery slope. That slope is made more dangerous because, through written text, we have lost the ability to see the nugget that is sarcasm. I began to notice this lack of ability to see sarcasm on Facebook. I had to start labeling links to Babylon Bee as "sarcasm." At that point, I knew we might be doomed to live a boring, drab life where comedy is dead. And for those of us who use humor to get through the bad times, that's a great loss.
Such as he was walking out with this hands clasped behind his back. Some people do walk that way. His wife could have had his arm. Yes, it could have been an arrest, but it is only speculation. It's not like the camera angle showed handcuffs on the man, and I can't find a reputable source that shows he was arrested. And by reputable, I don't mean MSM. The sites that I see that show his arrest are amateur at best. I do believe that is Abigail Perlman Blunt walking beside him and not an arresting officer.
On Sunday morning around 2:00 a.m., the report came in that the lights were out at the WH. I went to the D.C. cams. All cams except the WH were "out of service." The WH cam was not pointing to the WH but at the top of the Washington Monument. I'd been following this off and on all day because of the guard on the portico. So, I know the lights were out or at least the camera feed cut to all the cams but the one that was not looking in the direction it had the way it had been pointing all day. I awoke on Sunday morning to the news that something had happened at the WH around 3:00 a.m. I watched the video. All the cams were working again. It appeared that several police or other law enforcement vehicles were parked in front of the WH. An ambulance left the WH followed by all those vehicles with red and blue lights flashing. Off behind the WH on the highway, there was clearly some police or enforcement activity. Lights were flashing at different places on the highway. Then the poster of a later video claimed he watched this going on from 3:00 a.m to 6:00 a.m. and that fireworks went off at 6:00 a.m. I didn't believe the poster at first, but when I went to show the video I'd watched earlier, I noticed something peculiar before the cam was cut off. A bright night flared like a firework and then the stream was cut. I went back. Definitely the start of those fireworks. The poster was correct. Something happened very early Sunday morning, but not a word has been leaked. Those who speculate on Alt-MSM are saying arrests were made, but I keep asking this important question: how are they containing the reports of these arrests from others who will or should be arrested?
Someone else has indicated his arrest, however, a man walking with his hands behind his back and a woman holding his arm as they leave, especially as others who attended the inauguration walk out, does have other explanations.
I do not care to hear anything that this nut job has to say. He isn't even as close to the someone who is hearing from a boyfriend who works as an assistant to a staffer a floor away from POTUS. It concerned me that DJT every entertained him. Sorry. There's something about him that just raises all the bells and alarms within my internal system. Perhaps it is that his job is to make us all seem like the nutcase he truly is. And if you can decode his message, and it turns out to be a real thing, I'll definitely apologize. Some don't like Simon Parkes, but I like this guy even less.
The answer to the question is LINCOLN.
You're misquoting. Go back and listen.
This whole thing blows apart our Constitution. Even the AP gets it. They understand that nothing is right about what's going on here. I am absolutely sick to my stomach. If our military does not step in and put a stop to these frauds in office, we are going to go beyond a point of no return. Congress has no precedence whatsoever. Trump's Law and Order sounds very important now, doesn't it? The Constitution is our law, but these people do not care. If they are willing to forego the Constitution, to allow a very impartial person to preside over a sham impeachment (the first against a president and now a second one against something that is not Constitutional--a private citizen). How do you think Leahy will rule if they attempt to bring in evidence of voting fraud even though that fraud was the reason the patriots (who were framed, by the way), were in D.C. on January 6 for a PEACEFUL protest. The evidence will again go unseen. It's time--it's past time for the military to get involved. https://townhall.com/columnists/briandarling/2021/01/15/the-unconstitutionality-of-a-senate-impeachment-trial-of-donald-j-trump-postpresidency-n2583213
Better picture: http://watchesinmovies.info/img/f/AngelsAndDemons_Mickey.jpg More Explanation: https://movies.stackexchange.com/questions/10159/what-is-the-story-behind-robert-langdons-mickey-mouse-watch Just a coincidence?
Antwon: Did you see Mr. Pompeo's Scripture for today. Now that's a God-incidence. Thanks again for the reminder to trust in God.
Yes. I have been following him closely. He had finished some chemo and had another scare. Praying for him. We can disagree with others and still be civilized. I think the World According to Twitter taught us to forget about that. I just haven't been able to listen to him because of the single focus, and I think many are just afraid to mention anything for fear of being ostracized. That, to me, seems hypocritical to what they do.
What strikes me is the utter silence on behalf of some of the Alt-MSM like Bongino, et al., who still have their tentacles in MSM either via contracts or a failure to want to leave the teat they suckle. I like Bongino and Levin, but they're hiding from some important truths. Dan seems to live inside the bubble of "poor Parler and look what they've done to me" and playing big, bad boy. He's going to mess up whoever messes with him. He has a myopic, self-centered view of what is affecting him. I grew tired of it after three days solid of that. While I do care about those things, Dan is missing the bigger picture. Americans are living in information darkness unless they are truly seeking out information, and though we are engaged, how many still have not or do not want to know what is truly happening? Dan interviewed Flynn, but he danced around the issue.
The practice of putting up this crap as if it is real is a very dangerous practice. I can't even dig deep enough to pull up the hatred I have for this kind of "trick." There are enough dangerous truths out there that we do not need to make up things.