4
MyDaughtersDaddy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks for asking -- I was clueless about this as well. It's not enough of a reason to watch TV so I'll continue on as normal.

2
MyDaughtersDaddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

This place is still up! I knew it was better than all those meanies... I did notice AWS was down -- that is probably causing lots of pain.

1
MyDaughtersDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fauci said, “So that’s the one thing I want to make sure that our viewers realize that we’ve done well in the sense of getting 55% of the population fully vaccinated and 64% with at least one dose.”

I found that curious, because the CDC and Joe Biden said that they reached 70% with at least one dose back on August 2, one month after Biden’s goal of July 4. So did we go back and lose six percent unvaccinated, and/or has no one increased the amount of vaccinations since August? Because that’s surely what it looks like. What’s going on with that number?

"Have that many of the 'vaccinated' perished?", is the question that popped into my head after reading this.

by PepeSee
1
MyDaughtersDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

How that manifesto ever inspired anyone is beyond me. Have you tried to read that crap?

18
MyDaughtersDaddy 18 points ago +18 / -0

Go after the target which will have the most impact. Once the media is out of the way, the doctors, politicians and other evil-doers will have no place to hide.

8
MyDaughtersDaddy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Population: Total:990,837

20,000 of 100,000 ballots are suspect if every man, woman and child was eligible to vote.... I'd say they are approaching 35-40% fraud when you remove children and otherwise non-eligible voters.

2
MyDaughtersDaddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh dear, what if my tax return never gets to the US?

IRS shouldn't be that concerned as I have only seen the first covid relief payment arrive here so I know the government isn't too bothered by things being slow.

1
MyDaughtersDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw an ad post on FB the other day from Hannity and it was advertising a Microsoft Azure or something like that (I haven't used anything from MS for 25 years so I don't really know what that is). Therefore, we know he is taking 'dark' money and he wouldn't care if they did.

by BQnita
2
MyDaughtersDaddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think its on the to-do list for Harris. I'm sure she will get to it after she finally makes it to the trouble spots on the border. Maybe she has a trip scheduled to Miami or Orlando -- that is close enough to Cuba, isn't it?

by 369Q
1
MyDaughtersDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've always wanted to try to reproduce some of Dr. Emoto's experiment, but have never gotten around to it.

by 369Q
1
MyDaughtersDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe this is from a dream of mine, but I think there was an experiment where they used two sensors (one per slit) and the photons always passed through the slit for which they first examined (observed) the data. It was some experiment where they were trying to show that it required a conscious observer before the outcome would manifest.

2
MyDaughtersDaddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

with a flourish that would not be past Nancy Pelosi or a psychopathic narcissist.

I propose an edit to make this say "or any other psychopathic narcissist."

1
MyDaughtersDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's about a far as I could stand to read the article without dressing up like a fly fisherman.

4
MyDaughtersDaddy 4 points ago +4 / -0

The sheer numbers of people vaccinated - nearly 95% of those over 60 and 84% of those under 60 - mean that statistically, double-vaccinated people will still be a significant proportion of hospital patients.

This is true if the vaccine is completely ineffective. With a working vaccine shouldn't the number be near zero?

1
MyDaughtersDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are three Q posts saying "Keep your eye on the ball".

1
MyDaughtersDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Especially the case if the pilot has been jabbed... then it applies to non-vaxxed as well.

8
MyDaughtersDaddy 8 points ago +8 / -0

I have always believed it was a creation of the Rothschild's. Don't know which reports to the other.

1
MyDaughtersDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I assume they verified that the duplicate ballots matched what a reasonable person's interpretation of the original ballot would be. If the original no longer exists, then the duplicate is not valid. The reason for making a duplicate in the first place is that the original has a flaw which prevents it to be machine-counted, as I understand it. If they duplicated ballots which could have been scanned correctly, then that is another problem.

1
MyDaughtersDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

They wouldn't be stupid enough to store a manipulated image. Imagine if three weeks after the scan that a particular abnormality is discovered. If the pure scan is stored you can go back and look at it. If a processed image was stored, then the data which they need to look at might no longer be available.

If one is doing image processing/detection, then they would always want to use the best, full representation of the data as input to the algorithm. The auditors were not the corner-cutting type, they were the type that would do things correctly even if it took more time.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›