Listen to yourself, you are using my religious texts. thats my domain not yours, But when I say your view is flawed, talking about MY OWN RELIGION, it's like it goes right over your head and you can't see how someone who is way outside of context and deep thought of the subject making claims which are rooted in shallow understanding, could possibly be wrong about the premise. Let alone, that your world view STILL doesn't actually make any of your arguments against Christianity valid. You try to maintain something as immoral when you admit nothing is truelly immoral and it's all opinion.
What is evil? stop stealing religious words to try and justify your position. You can't say anything is moral and actually have a ground to stand on, to you everything is subjective, its just your opinion. Where as I have an objective grounding for saying If something is evil or not.
God can kill, and it's perfectly moral. We cannot kill, we don't have the power over life and death, we are not the creators of all creation. When God kills, what does that mean from a Christian perspective? It means he moved them from the material realm to the next. He can do that, we cannot prematurely to that.
- also in a world of subjective morality, murder rape, genocide, etc isn't actually wrong. Is just currently considered wrong to the opinion of you and those around you. So it's odd that you think God would have to be subject to your opinion.
Haha. Okay, I will answer each of your (already asked and answered) poor arguments, later when i have time to do ao.
- but first, the very idea that God could be immoral showed a flawed perception of the nature of God.
- your "morality" is admittedly not objective, so in your world view, Hitler didn't do anything objectively wrong, it just wrong to you, in the current age of society. If someone were to steal an infant, rape them, eat them alive, and shit on the remains it would not be objectively bad, in fact, in your world view. It's possible that it could be subjectively good and right.
- in a world without objective morality everything is permissible.
You have no moral standing, many of the worst mass genocide leaders were athiest. People are sinners theists and atheists alike. Your argument is not valid. Atheists can be moral just like theists. The point is you have no real moral grounds. Morality is merely an opinion in your view.
Your title a little This is misleading. They didn't ask "who anonymous is" they asked "do you know who anonymous is" so his answer changes in a material way