What's your opinion of drunk driving laws? That analogy occurred to me the other day. You could say, if you want to get drunk and drive home, you should have the freedom to do so. But the drunk driving laws are there to protect OTHERS, not the person involved. The same logic is currently being used for masks, rightly or wrongly. So you aren't being asked to wear a mask for your own benefit, but for the benefit of others (just like you are asked to not dive drunk for the benefit of others). IF they were effective in that regard, would you then support a mask mandate?
There's masks for the masses, and there's masks for the medical profession. Ask any doctor about wearing masks in a hospital ... that has been going on for decades and they have never complained (and they are ... doctors ... ). This idea that masks have no value to anyone anywhere is a dangerous extension of a core idea.
Scam alert - did you read the page linked in the article? "we are welcoming the public to join as a founding member with an annual $100 USD fee we want to create FAFTACOINS. This capital will be used to help FREEDOM FLIGHTS to move our members safely."
Edit To Add - I think this is a scam also because I'm pretty sure all major US airports are Federally regulated and one airline simply could not go it alone like this. Maybe if they operated out of private airfields ... but I strongly doubt it.
We need to take REAL trafficking seriously. Fantasizing about temporary living spaces for migrant kids is not 'taking it serious', it's taking your eye off the goal. I mean, if they put the kids up in the Ritz Carlton and fed them caviar, you'd say it was so that Tom Hanks could fly in and enjoy himself; if they gave the children $1,000 spending money you'd say it was so they could get fat and be more 'tasty'. Common sense needs to prevail here. This is being done to virtue-signal to the base, that's all.
My real concern here is that some poor truck driver is going to get held up at gun-point while driving one of these temporary residences on the freeway by some crazed person who is convinced there are Children inside. We need to focus on the real issues.
They have to be robust enough to be moved around, since they are intended for reuse. But they are just like mobile offices, mobile homes, etc. You don't have to be a handshake to challenge the notion these are for trafficking of children.
Methadone is NOT heroin; it is a substitute that is not claimed to be 'the same'. It's designed to give you 'some' of the feelings of heroin while also allowing you to gradually get off of the habit. Synthetic adrenochrome is, however, pure. Synthetic, in this case, simply means synthesized in a lab.
As the other poster said, there's absolutely no evidence to support the fantasy that there is a unique quality of 'adrenochrome' extracted from children. The fact that person 'a' said something, person 'b' referred to 'a' as a source, and person 'c' then says 'I've seen plenty of "Evidence" (from a and b) does not constitute rational scientific examination.
God exists. They cannot prove or disprove it. It's called faith. Anyone claiming to "KNOW" that God doesn't exist is a total fraud.
Using pure logic and reason, the opposite also can be said - 'Anyone claiming to 'KNOW' that God exists is a total fraud'. I don't argue that, but from a purely logical perspective, both arguments have equal value.
What's Mr Potato Head done now?