When future proves past I'm not sure that is the correct interpretation

Would citizen arrests work?

He didn't say never just not in this case. He didn't want the jury to have too much data to digest. It isn't needed anyway. Durham was going for bonus points.

That is exactly my point

Why do you assume he's talking about Trump?

Oh white hats you're awesome

Are they trying to set precident for attorney client privilege for the upcoming durham slaughter?

That isn't a friend

Which goal was that cause he's neither impeached nor is his term over?

It's not military it says "fbi" right on the shirts

And a siren they can turn on if the teacher gets off track

I won't be the only one. Meet you at the bar when it's over

Unless it was under seal. And under penalty of death.

Gov Youngkin declared their protection order but I thought that was police not mil

Is attractive too much to ask too? I would rather not vomit when looking at them

I disagree. Who would be getting sued? You don't have to know who did the thing for the thing to be true and provable. Seems they would have the power to address the issue outside of litigation. My 2 cents. For instance no one sued to overturn roe they just decided to end it. As far as I can tell anyway.

My point is that at least we know it's not too late...yet

They may have preexisting morbidity already. This would only be strange if they kept it on when at home. But it would be even weirder to follow them home to fund out.

Dead

This happened?

I hope hebtells them to kick rocks

The same logic applies to assuming guilt if someone pleads the 5th

Why not both?

What does it mean to modulate the immune system?

She's one person with no authority on her own to make the military do shit. Get a grip