Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

253
Interesting and fascinating theory about why the justices are getting military protection. (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 4 years ago by b472113 4 years ago by b472113 +253 / -0
73 comments download share
73 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (73)
sorted by:
▲ 71 ▼
– GA-Peach-Patriot 71 points 4 years ago +71 / -0

I want to believe, I really do. But, what is this source? Why should it be believed or deemed reliable? Not picking at you, OP...just wondering aloud.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 38 ▼
– b472113 [S] 38 points 4 years ago +38 / -0

No source, obviously hopium +++.

As noted, just an idea.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– CQVFEFE 19 points 4 years ago +19 / -0

Nopium ;)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Murphy71 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

More like copium.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– jcab93 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Guess I'll just continue to mopium 😞

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ChronicMetamorphosis 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

We were expecting dank nugs, but all we got is schwag.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Fren_Downunder 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Shittium

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– crashdaddy 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0

According to Forbes, they threw out the last case about a year ago. That's not to say there can't be new ones, but I haven't found any.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– merf 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Yeah it feels like there would have to be a case.

Are there any historical examples of the court taking a case in secret?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– merf 18 points 4 years ago +18 / -0

Well shit, guess that would have been worth a search before a post. 😅

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/22/supreme-court-will-let-possible-mueller-company-file-papers-in-secret.html

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Red_Pill_Pusher_Man 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

Interdasting! I wonder whatever happened to the case that Mike Lindell was trying to get before the SCOTUS?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– InmatesRunTheAsylum 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

I was just going to ask about this. Glad that I kept reading.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– crashdaddy 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

According to this thing, they've done so recently. Interesting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– S11houette 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

Absolutely. And you aren't going to hear about them....

There is a requirement in the constitution that all people have to right to a public trial. They can wave that right if they choose.

But other cases have no requirement of being public. In fact, the court might find that keeping the details of a case secret may be necessary for the case to get a fair hearing or to protect national secrets.

Election fraud would likely fall under both categories. The sources and methods used to catch foreign governments in the act are likely sensitive.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– Perrin 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

I disagree. Who would be getting sued? You don't have to know who did the thing for the thing to be true and provable. Seems they would have the power to address the issue outside of litigation. My 2 cents. For instance no one sued to overturn roe they just decided to end it. As far as I can tell anyway.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– S11houette 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

My popcorn has been hot for years.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Cuttinmuffins 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Mine's stale and now it's to expensive to buy more.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– crazycloud2 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I planted some, along with my regular corn this year.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Pandas4trump2020 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

It would be on their docket. It's not therefore this is fake and ghey.

Its almost like i remember someone saying "Military is the only way"...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– queue-anon 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

I can’t stand when people post things like this and they talk as if they are fact. Then they have the audacity to put that sly emoji as if they are so clever. I mostly see this type of garbage on telegram channels by people who want to famefag

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– Iknowstuff 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Agreed

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DarQ2light 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Plausible as f***

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– BirchTBarlow 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

I'll believe it when I see it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– 2ndenthusiast 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Would be fuckin cool. u/#q2283 u/#q1155

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

It's not "The only way is the Supreme Court."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– DragonBallz 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Dang! If this is true, cue the space alien invasion distraction...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– WeAreThePlan 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

I've been waiting for that. I vote for the space aliens to be striped green and pink.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Perrin 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Is attractive too much to ask too? I would rather not vomit when looking at them

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– WeAreThePlan 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

That sounds like someone who has seen too many photos of Cankles lately in the news.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Snowgirl1965 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

But polka dots are so much more flattering.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– WeAreThePlan 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

True. I could go for polka dots. Deep State, are you listening? We could go for polka dotted fake space aliens.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Snowgirl1965 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

😆😆😆

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ATLAS_ONE 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

If this happens I will eat my head.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– GreenLivesMatter 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Would be Ultra RAD

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MICHIGANisRED 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

All that's missing is an exact datefag

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– bpsays 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

It is also missing that Trump will send out the emergency broadcast and tweet about the storm before SCOTUS announces. cue epic movie outro music

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– JeremyBearimy 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

No source... Just words. This just agitates people. Q didn't say this. No facts to support. Just words.

"Within the next several weeks..."

Bull Shit

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– HoppyHap 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

The court has been running shadow docket cases that receive very limited briefings and are rarely, if ever, argued before the justices for quite sometime. However, I do think because of the riots that would occur the change over would never be public. I would think a shadow government plan would be implemented.

Nothing surprises me any longer and beer is good and people are crazy.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– IceK1ng 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Where is it reported they have mil protection?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Perrin 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Gov Youngkin declared their protection order but I thought that was police not mil

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– NooneFor2024II 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Oh, so they are worthy of protection but we are not. Got it.

"Rules for we, not for thee"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– chicagotrauma 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

From that keyboard to God's eyes

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Sunnywindows 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Maybe not true but I sure enjoyed reading it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– boataholic 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

That would mean "the Supreme Court is the only way". So nope.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– VoatAnon1984 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Datttttttttttteeeeeeeeeee FAGGINGGGGG!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Sadness 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Not quite. It is secret agenda fagging.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– spaceforceltc 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

The only reason I can see this happening is so that they can give Trump a 2 year term and make him inelligible to run again in 2024. And he will be too busy in these two years cleaning up Brandon's mess that he won't be able to do anything else.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Sadness 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Yes, I agree. Those dynamics will change on Jan 20, 2023. But that is after the data collection period is shut down, i.e. September 2022, when the statutory 22 months of preserving election data is over. This happens two months before the midterms. So t get the full juicy sauce, investigators will keep that window open as long as possible.

We have it all, but would you not like to go for max bust?

So, on that basis, I imagine we will first see a red wave come midterms. Then more info drops, and then a major event early in 2023.

Now I'm date fagging.

See what you made me do.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SgtPepper29 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I would have turned this movie off years ago...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– rherrell 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Elections are run by the states, until a state presents a case to the SC they can't do a damn thing.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AngelTrumpet 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

The Left SCJ would leak it rather than have the left sent to oblivion

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Perrin 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Unless it was under seal. And under penalty of death.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AngelTrumpet 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Is there a precedent where the SCOTUS was held under the penalty of death? I'd love to be wrong and this to play out. Getting weary and wanting a normal world RSN.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Katrina241 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

They'll wait until the schools are out for summer. Can't have the Liberal Insane blowing up any more kids.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Rooks 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Ok, so we should go back and watch the Thomas and Robert's statements about the leak and see if it is vague enough to allow this. I very much doubt they would lie on record about the case upon which they are working.... more likely they would leave it vague, but that is not what I remember them saying.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Petiteputnam1 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Lmaooo I'll have what you're smoking

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– BoomerNuc 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Yeah, we will see. I for one do not think this is the case but would be happy to be wrong

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– JakeCAnon 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Complete BS

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DavoutNey 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

There is no case currently on the docket that would purport to do anything close to this.

Bullshit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– American_Nostalgic 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

This is stretch considering the Supreme Court rejected every case put in front of them, so what are they ruling on? Which cases did the Supreme Court docket???

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– MisprisionIsEvil 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

If devolution is true, it's possible the court is being told what to do. We simply don't know what's actually happening.

We're at the mercy of liars. Even the good guys are liars. They just don't call it that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Striker1 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Ooohhhh, such a great guess! Something is going to happen— so why not that!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– R3tro 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

2…… moar…….weeeeeeeeeeeeeekkkkkkssssssss

permalink save report block reply
View 1 more comment

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy