Why did we even fight WWII? The US should have stayed out of it.
The US was attacked on our own soil. Should we have just rolled over and ignored all the Americans killed at Pearl Harbor and the Philippines? Also, if we had stayed out of WW2, we wouldn't be the powerhouse that we are today. The massive jump in manufacturing capacity and the dollar being made the world reserve currency were all outcomes of WW2.
If government leaders want to fight overseas, let them and their families don fatigues.
But we aren't fighting overseas. There aren't any American soldiers fighting on the ground in Ukraine.
Most of all, we need transparency in ALL agencies that would survive a purge.
Sure, but I still don't see how we could fund this on alcohol taxes and tariffs. I think the interstate system alone costs more than the government could bring in on those.
I'll respond to both of your comments here.
I certainly believe people are suffering from auto-immune diseases. Nearly everyone I know has one or several of them! Which I believe are from previous vaccinations (childhood and adult, flu shots, boosters, covid, etc), from toxic exposure (chemicals, fertilizer, improper sewage treatment, etc), and from poor nutrition (either from poverty or harmful additives added to our food supply).
Then why aren't doctors diagnosing them with AIDS if they have HIV antibodies?
Like Mag said in this thread, look into Polio, Spanish Flu, Covid. Were these caused by viruses or toxins? (Vaccinations, BTW, are injections of toxins.)
What doesn't make sense to me is that these things happened quite quickly. There were only two known vaccinations at the time of the Spanish Flu, one for Smallpox and one for Typhoid fever. Neither one of these were widespread throughout the population. If the "disease" was caused by these, you would expect it to only affect countries and places with high vaccination rates. However, it hit everywhere, and it did so rapidly. Massive numbers of people weren't being vaccinated, so how could this be caused by vaccines? I think questioning is good, but trying to attribute all these things to vaccines seems dubious. Even during Covid, 99% of people were already vaccinated and had been since childhood. Why did everything change so quickly then if it wasn't a virus? I got sick with what they called Covid and I haven't been that sick in more than a decade at least.
Are you sure a HIV test could be given without a medical questionnaire being submitted? I can't get any test or procedure done without that paperwork.
You can get an anonymous test in the mail. I think they still do ask questions, but there is no way to verify since they don't require an ID. If they were making up results, it would be super easy to find out, and I think we would already see people showing us just that.
Faulty tests. Just like the Covid tests. HIV antibodies can be in the body for several reasons. If the test detects them, then they look at the person's life to see if it's a positive or false-positive. Being gay, an IV user, had blood transfusion, exposed to someone with aids, then they say Positive. Being pregnant, having other auto-immune diseases, not being exposed, then, that's a False-Positive.
That makes no sense, though. How can there be "HIV antibodies" if HIV is fake? And how are tests consistent. I've seen people go to multiple doctors and be independently tested, and they are very consistent, even when personal history isn't given. Your whole comment just doesn't make sense. On one hand you say they're faking it, but on the other you're saying that people have real autoimmune disorders, so which is it? Also, I've known of people who decide not to treat their AIDS or take any drugs, but instead try a good diet and exercise, and they die horrifically. How do you explain that?
The income tax came in well before FDR, when the Republicans were in charge because the federal government couldn't function on taxes on alcohol and tobbaco. The expansion of the federal government led to the greatest economic surge this country has ever seen. We couldn't have fought WW2 without it. And where will these job cuts come from? Even if you wiped out the entire Department of Justice, that would only be about 3% of the federal work force. The largest federal government departments are the DoD (37%) and the VA (11%). It would be hard to make cuts without basically destroying the military and screwing over veterans. How would we pay for all those? And why should a bunch of California billionaires get all their money tax-free?
Here we go again with gutting the military. Do you realize that 37% of federal employees work for the DoD? Another 11% work for Veteran Affairs. So, yeah, you can fire 95% of them, if you don't mind hamstringing the military and screwing over those who have already fought and sacrificed for our country. Not to mention other federal positions, like postal workers, weathermen, and several other small departments that keep things like GPS or the highway system working.
I have a hard time believing anyone that deep in the CIA could be telling the truth. At that level, they've weeded all dissenters out. If anyone does slip through, then they're eliminated once it is realized that they could spill the beans. This is a classic DS psyops campaign.
How else do we get taxes though? Believe me, I'm all for reform, but who is going to pay for things like national defense? Libertarians want to gut the military even more than the Democrats. How is President Trump going to enact revenge if we hamstring all the government departments that are going to help him?
That doesn't make sense though. I knew a guy who had AIDS. He worked as a paramedic and was stuck by a needle. He had a second and third independent opinions, and they all came to the same conclusion. How could they do that if AIDS doesn't exist? How could they know which patients to test positive and which to test negative?
I'm not sure you understand how being undercover works. He has to look the part. So he'll vote to support some of the elites agendas, like supporting investments into infrastructure and green energy. He'll remain undercover until the big day, the storm. When that happens, everyone will then be revealed.
Even so, I think the white hats have a lot of operatives within the Deep State. He's an actor, he's playing a role. Do you think everyone on our side is blatantly open about it? Do you think that we don't have any secret operatives undercover, perfectly positioned for the day when the storm comes?
And all the European nations just accepted the vaccines and killed millions of their own populations as well? The reason this is called the Spanish Flu because Spain was the first to publically declare the numbers of those who were dying. They weren't getting box loads of these vaccines during the middle of the war, so what caused that?