You asked an open ended question, that actually has a direct answer (rare these days). Might I suggest making sure those you are using your energy on, walk away asking more of themselves, than feeling superior after such a query?
Perhaps this might have a better format maybe?
Even if the other side loses, what has really been won? Innocents still died, you still choose a side, and is anyone any the better for it? (The "you" in this is just a placeholder, not directed at you fren)
An inflated ego is harder to breach from hence forth on, after all. Anyone who can give that answer might also just brush you off, which is fine as we aren't the arbiters of fate, but I digress.
I get where you were headed with it, and do concur. Just suggestions from a very quiet observer in this whole ordeal.
Because in order for someone to win... There must be loss. That's how it works.
Don't celebrate the loss; bad karma/juju for that kind of thing is long documented, that's reasonable. But the question posited first is a tad naive, no offense.
I think it's good for the kids to experience the plight of the planet!
shots rings out
Roll em up!
Billy... and the boingers.
BY... raised BY.
To be honest people who harp of video games need to observe that, that is getting upset at the tool. It's a device... if the child is raised to understand the values of things, it stays a device. So let's fix the home front before we go attacking things that are inanimate? Seems like a waste of time, as they don't have any way to feel the guilt people placed upon them, versus the accountability of users that should be attuned too.
I do agree people need to get outside and touch grass, but let me finish the level real quick. (Hah)
I'm living proof btw. I study spiritual, mental, and physical. Animal and mineral... just to add some Sullivan.
Not all who play games are dithers. Depends on the ground the seed sprouts from, and who tends to it while growing.
I'm guessing, Mississippi is majority clay and sandy loam type land, and because of that it's almost impossible to build underground shelters attached to houses.
The ground shifts to much, and as such, detaches any sub structures from their anchoring. Can find this in tornado alley states too.
Which is why you won't see anything but slabs there.
Could be totally wrong, but that's my take.
Looked it up. It's Clash of the titans not Wrath.
Calibos
Originally Acrisius.
Anyone in the know, you've just added a layer to your meme.
Acrisius was twisted by the "gods" into Calibos, after doing what he was told to do, by them. Seduced by power. Fitting.
Are you for sure this isn't the main antagonist of Wrath of the Titans? The original with Harryhausen claymation? Both Jason and Wrath had the same level of production, given the times, and as such, the same effects.
Not important in the grand scheme, just curious.
Top kek fren!
Just as you aren't accepting of his. Ironic isn't it? And now you'll jump to defend that it isn't the case, that we are blind or just "not seeing it the way you see the evidence point" right? Realise its a two way road, this finger pointing. Totally productive at creating nothing, and infighting.
Also for all the hype you put on her stage name of "rockefeller", took 5 seconds to see her full name of Nova Leigh Paholek. I get it, this is the same old idea that its got connotations of evil, so it must BE evil right? Ever think that's just what young kids looking to rebel against their parents, for shock value, have done for millennia?
Think the goth, or grunge, or metal music movements, and accordingly their iconography, are new? I mean the instruments are newer versions I suppose...
The kind of "shock and awe" style you are getting offended by, is the why it is used in that way. It's meant to create a reaction, grab attention, and so on. Seems to be effective no?
Got any other names you want to call me, and anyone else who doesn't see things as you do?
Conspiracies are real, often enough. You wouldn't be on here if there wasn't something compelling to the whole thing. Not all are valid or logical, true, but this one is a lil to sus to rule it out entirely. Especially the location.
I never said or agreed that this was a hit, yet you've decided to attack a swath of people who do by calling names. Grow up.
Can a satellite see the hair on your arm from space? Does geo location exist? Is he a sherriff in a hotly contested part of this whole ordeal? Do we not carry around things on such devices as vehicles, phones, and the like, that can ID us?
Is he really that hard to single out as a target?
Not hard to see where the logic in your argument falls flat.
If you look at it up close, it's two hands overlapped. The nails give it away. The women on the right has black or darker nail polish. The thumb is the left woman's left hand, with white polish. So there's 4 fingers but no thumb, then directly above, supporting the side, is the thumb and lacking fingers.
I don't see anything "generated" here honestly, just a bad angle.
I'll be honest, I wish I was wise.
You made me stop and think. I need to do it more often here. Thank you! Be well fren!