I love tea, so I took it quite literally at first.
Also today I learned the difference between "spilling the tea" (to gossip, not necessarily a secret) vs "spilling the beans" (to tell people secret information)
Wow he really made them all go AFUERA!
Welcome back!
I bring this up to my son often: growing even 1 bowl of rice is NOT EASY.
Farmers work very hard to bring that rice to us. It's very, very easy to take it for granted because it looks so plentiful.
Some examples:
Time-lapse of growing rice (turn on subtitles)
A Better Tomorrow 2 - "rice is just like my mother and father. don't f with my family"
♫Crème Fraîche... Cafeteria Fraîche ♫
"the San Francisco woman"
Great.
It was stolen near Noe and Market
Was it really stolen? Or was it towed away and she didn't want to pay for the fine?
From the article:
As for her critics, she sneered at them. “Look at these good, Christian ‘victim advocates’ celebrating my kids losing their belongings at Christmas,” she fired at the haters in general.
Oh no you didn't!
Man, thought it was Hillsborough, California for a second. It's where wealthy people live. Median house price is around $5 mil.
It's likely one of the references listed in this paper:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK234368/
(Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines: A Report of the Committee to Review the Adverse Consequences of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines)
On the basis of the studies at hand, about 10 percent of SIDS deaths that occur within 1 month after DPT vaccination occur within 3 days of vaccination. If half of these, 5 percent, were caused by DPT, there would be only an even chance of detecting it in the pooled analysis. In his paper prepared for the committee, Walker (1990) estimated that about 20 percent of the 5,000 annual U.S. SIDS deaths occur within 2 weeks of immunization, so perhaps 40 percent, or 2,000, occur within 1 month. A 5 percent increase in this number, 100 cases per year, could go undetected in the data available.
It didn't specifically say which "studies," or maybe I'm not looking hard enough. Maybe the one by Walker in 1987? It has a link to that paper there.
They're all funny until it reaches "what my children think I do," then it's just sad.
It's a specific vaccine - the MMR (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella). One shot at 12 months and another shot at 4 years old.
Effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine in autism spectrum disorders - NIH article
Dr. Hulda Clark had this to say in her work "The Cure for All Diseases":
Lead accumulation is always seen in children with autism.
Her solution was inconclusive, but includes a herbal cleanse, change in diet that excludes heavy metal (like eggs and bacon), and dental work.
If you look at the other comments from blacksmith and bubble_bursts, the common denominator is that heavy metal, in particular mercury, is the primary cause of autism. Children are unable to produce enough glutathione to fight that heavy metal.
Which is why I believe NAC has a positive effect, despite the paper being from NIH. NAC can also cross the blood brain barrier, which vaccines can also do and cause neurological damage.
For the young ones, this infertility chart best shows why it gets exponentially difficult to get pregnant after around age 35:
https://nycivf.com/female-factor-infertility/
Of course the Cabal knows about this, so they design the economy to make early family planning difficult. "getting an education first," "getting a management position to get more money," "women empowerment" are some of the resulting decisions. By the time we want to start a family, our age may very well go above 35 years old, and we may have to resort to IVF, which is around $30k each and the process isn't exactly fun - lots of needles to the buttocks, for one.
If the family decides to pop children early, the chance of the family being dependent on government welfare is pretty high. The children may not be able to get a quality education or quality food intake.
Hopefully in the future we may see more regulations that encourage early family planning.
Everything he does just oozes AMERICA!
Happy Thanksgiving!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH I saw the video, I repressed it, and i don't want to remember! (It's on the 2nd to lower left corner of the picture)
That's what's so evil about the jab. It took over 3 YEARS for it to take effect. And when you look back you're gonna have doubts on whether or not it was the jab. The research, too - which kind of research? The NIH "I need sauce" kind of research, or the autist "BS meter" research? The former won't do you much good.
It's like the stock market really. "Yeeeeah if I buy Apple stock in 1980 or Bitcoin in 2016 I'll be a trillionaire."
But the story almost sounds like he faked the stroke to avoid extradiction.
Maggie Nixon, I believe. Q drops 1206-1226. I believe she survived and assumed another name. She has a blog but I don't recall the name, it was a while ago.
Full transcript: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/75521
It is veeeery long. TL;DR - The West is super duper bad. We just want peace and nationalism, like many other nations. It's almost here.
Highlighted parts:
New powers are rising. Nations are becoming more and more aware of their interests, their value, uniqueness and identity, and are increasingly insistent on pursuing the goals of development and justice.
There comes, in a way, the moment of truth. The former world arrangement is irreversibly passing away, actually it has already passed away, and a serious, irreconcilable struggle is unfolding for the development of a new world order. It is irreconcilable, above all, because this is not even a fight for power or geopolitical influence. It is a clash of the very principles that will underlie the relations of countries and peoples at the next historical stage. Its outcome will determine whether we will be able, through joint efforts, to build a world that will allow all nations to develop and resolve emerging contradictions based on mutual respect for cultures and civilisations, without coercion and use of force. And finally, whether the human society will be able to retain its ethical humanistic principles, and whether an individual will be able to remain human.
Traditional democracy and the rule of the people are being set against an abstract notion of freedom, for the sake of which, as some argue, democratic procedures, elections, majority opinion, freedom of speech, and an unbiased media can be disregarded or sacrificed.
Meanwhile, the former hegemons, who have been accustomed to ruling the world since colonial times, are increasingly astonished that their commands are no longer heeded. Efforts to cling to their diminishing power through force result only in widespread instability and more tensions, leading to casualties and destruction. However, these efforts fail to achieve the desired outcome of maintaining absolute, unchallenged power.
Instead of recognising the futility of their ambitions and the objective nature of change, certain Western elites seem poised to go to any lengths to thwart the development of a new international system that aligns with the interests of the global majority.
unlike our counterparts, Russia does not view Western civilisation as an adversary, nor does it pose the question of ”us or them.“ I reiterate: ”You're either with us or against us“ is not part of our vocabulary. We have no desire to teach anyone or impose our worldview upon anyone.
the new world is characterised by a combination or parallel existence of two seemingly incompatible elements: a rapidly growing conflict potential and the fragmentation of the political, economic and legal spheres, on the one hand, and the continued close interconnection of the global space as a whole, on the other hand.
I mentioned this some time ago, and I will now touch on it briefly, without mentioning any names. In the mid-1990s and even in the late 1990s, a US politician remarked that, from that point on, they would treat Russia not as a defeated adversary but as a blunt tool in their own hands. That was the principle they were guided by. They lacked a broad outlook and overall cultural and political awareness; they failed to comprehend the situation and understand Russia. By distorting the results of the Cold War to suit their interests and reshaping the world according to their ideas, the West displayed flagrant and unprecedented geopolitical greed. These are the real origins of the conflicts in our historical era, beginning with the tragedies in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, and now Ukraine and the Middle East.
I wonder who that was. GH Bush?
Both Russia and the vast majority of nations are committed to bolstering the spirit of international advancement and the aspirations for lasting peace that have been central to development since the mid-20th century.
During my address at last year’s Valdai Forum, I ventured to delineate six principles which, in our estimation, ought to underpin relations as we embark upon a new phase of historical progression.
-
Firstly, openness to interaction stands as the paramount value cherished by the overwhelming majority of nations and peoples.
-
Secondly, we have consistently underscored the diversity of the world as a prerequisite for its sustainability.
-
Thirdly, we have said more than once that the new world can develop successfully only through the broadest inclusion.
-
Next, the key principle of security for all without exception is that the security of one nation cannot be ensured at the expense of others’ security.
Eastern philosophy, as many here are deeply familiar with – perhaps even more so than I am – takes a fundamentally different approach. It seeks harmony of interests, aiming for everyone to achieve their essential goals without compromising the interests of others, the principle of “I win, and you win too.”
- My fifth point is about justice for all.
- My sixth point is that we keep emphasising that sovereign equality is an imperative for any lasting international framework.
The modern world tolerates neither arrogance nor wanton disregard for others being different. To build normal relationships, above all, one needs to listen to the other party and try to understand their logic and cultural background, rather than expecting them to think and act the way you think they should based on your beliefs about them.
It should be remembered that everyone is equal, meaning that everyone is entitled to have their own vision, which is no better or worse than others – it is just different, and everyone needs to sincerely respect that.
Everyone should be clear that putting pressure on us is useless, but we are always prepared to sit down and talk based on consideration of our mutual legitimate interests in their entirety.
And that's just 1/10th of it, LOL. I couldn't finish. Can we bring Kamala to read that transcript? The meltdown will be for the ages.
P.S. Trump talked about nationalism and mutual respect also, I believe it was during the Twitter interview with Elon. So we can rest easy about that Zionism thread in GAW a few days ago, since Putin in this speech basically laid it all out about this "new global order."
Having a good time is more important than preserving your bloodline. Can't even say sorry to their ancestors when they die because they won't be going to heaven with that mindset.
It doesn't, but "stop it, get some help" may just work.
I drink seed oil too! Except it's black, lol
https://greatawakening.win/p/15HI62nu6C/excellent-black-seed-oil-article/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rSnsK3Ko/dr-kek--the-amazing-benefits-of/c/
We're memelords, so the proper response is "yes."
I remember back in 2020 at Donald.win, people made rumors that Trump would start a new party called Lion Party or something similar, and within a day or two the Trump campaign had to shut that rumor down with an official statement. That and they wanted Ted Cruz as VP, I think.