What they're describing (everyone being mixed-race, looking and thinking the same) is the globalists' dream.
It goes all the way back to Nimrod, who built the Tower of Babel as part of a plan to keep humanity from following God's command to split up and spread out over the Earth. Nimrod wanted everyone to live in the same massive tower-city and worship him.
God created different languages in order to foil this plan and cause the creation of separate nations spread out across the globe so that no one man or government could ever rule everyone again. The globalists, based on their plans and behaviors, seem to be followers of a Babylonian mystery religion based on Nimrod's ideology.
For all the lip-service they pay to diversity, their ultimate end goal is the end of diversity; a boring, homogenized version of humanity who all look, act, and think the same.
From the ancient historian Josephus:
"Now the plain in which they first dwelt was called Shinar. God also commanded them to send colonies abroad, for the thorough peopling of the earth, that they might not raise seditions among themselves, but might cultivate a great part of the earth, and enjoy its fruits after a plentiful manner. But they were so ill instructed that they did not obey God; for which reason they fell into calamities, and were made sensible, by experience, of what sin they had been guilty: for when they flourished with a numerous youth, God admonished them again to send out colonies; but they, imagining the prosperity they enjoyed was not derived from the favor of God, but supposing that their own power was the proper cause of the plentiful condition they were in, did not obey him. Nay, they added to this their disobedience to the Divine will, the suspicion that they were therefore ordered to send out separate colonies, that, being divided asunder, they might the more easily be Oppressed.
Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it was through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to be able to reach! and that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers!
Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them divers languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion."
Wow, I don’t know if I’ve ever seen an audience listening to a performance like that at any concert in my lifetime (The Seekers). A completely different vibe, carriage, and appearance to anything I can recall having seen. It’s as if everyone was my grandfather’s father.
It's also sort of uncanny to watch them here (in the early years of their career, performing the song that was their first big hit):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZf41UudAbI
...and then here (in their 2013 farewell tour):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrLTe1_9zso
It's the same people, but nearly a half-century apart in time, and it's possible to watch and listen to them in one period of their lives right after the other in the span of a few minutes. And one of them (Judith Durham - no relation to John Durham) is dead now, as of two years ago.
I've been reading a science fiction story recently that made an interesting point that recordings (records, movies, etc) of people from years ago are sort of like ghosts. They live on long past the physical life of the actual person. We take it all for granted these days, but the phonograph wasn't invented until 137 years ago. Before that, if you didn't hear someone's voice live and in person, you never heard it at all.
That Patsy Cline comment got me thinking, and I checked, and sure enough…
Buddy Holly:
I'm inclined to believe that those crashes were probably accidental. It would have been extremely hard to plan a crash for assassination purposes, since in each case, the musicians who wound up dead made a quick last-minute decision to fly rather than ride in a car or bus. As that bit about Patsy Cline that you quoted notes, she could have driven with her husband but decided to fly instead. It would have been really hard to make arrangements to crash the plane in order to kill her on such short notice.
It was a similar situation on "the day the music died." No one knew in advance which musicians would be on the plane, since there wasn't room for all of them and they had to decide which ones would fly and which ones would go on the bus. Two of them even flipped a coin to decide which one of them would go on the plane. The way the whole thing went down would have been extremely difficult to plan, especially for the purposes of taking out any particular person.
Someone else pointed out a guy named a guy named Ricky Nelson.
Ricky Nelson was a big star in his day. He started out on his parents' television show "Ozzie and Harriet" in the 1950s, and became an actor and singer. He was one of the biggest "teenage heartthrob" singers, probably second only to Elvis Presley. He was in various movies, including the John Wayne classic "Rio Bravo".
The crash that he died in was a rather weird one, apparently caused by a faulty heater that caused a fire in the cabin, which in turn caused the passengers to run to the front of the plane to flee the fire. It's somewhat more suspicious than the other two crashes, since there could have been time to plan a sabotage of the heater (because the flight was much less "spur of the moment" than the other two doomed flights), and both pilots survived and had conflicting stories of what happened. There's no real "smoking gun" to prove that it was intentional, though.
When it comes to crashes that I would be downright surprised if they weren't deliberate assassinations, the JFK, Jr. crash is the first one that comes to mind.
Why do most self-proclaimed or falsely labeled “constitutional scholars” quote the Federalist Papers and ignore the anti-Federalist Papers?
Because the Constitution was created entirely due to the victory of the Federalists over the Anti-Federalists. Before the Federalists won and instituted Federalism, we had the Articles of Confederation instead. The Constitution is inherently Federalist. The only way to return to Anti-Federalism would be to abolish the Constitution and either return to the Articles of Confederation or draft up a new document.
Will take a look at the others
If you like 1950s-1960s rock and roll or rockabilly, I'd especially recommend checking out all of the Millwinders' songs on Bandcamp (they're all available to sample for free). Several are country, some are rock and roll, etc. They used a variety of styles, but all classic ones.
Check this guy out. Not really a “country” singer per se, but he has some country styled songs as a Russian living in the NE US.
He's good, although I like the second song a lot less than the first. The sound of that first song (with the harmonies) reminds me a bit of the Seekers.
Here’s a couple.
Ah, I see what you mean. I ran a reverse image search on the second one and found this quote from her about drag queens:
“First of all, it takes a lot of courage. I mean, fashion in itself takes courage. You’re taking on a lot. And then the makeup, the ability to put their own makeup on and do such a beautiful job. I’ve learned a lot from drag queens. I watched their tutorials because no, I’ve never seen such transformation in some of these talents that their faces go through. Just through creative makeup. It’s very impressive and their fashion, I don’t know, I’m very inspired by it … I think we need this inspiration; we need drag queens to share their talent with us.”
From what I can tell, she didn't start using drag queen-inspired fashion or openly praising the LGBT movement until she was older. I saw some online comments from people saying she might have started doing it in order to pander to the Powers that Be when she was making her comeback post-Lyme disease (which had put her out of commission, career-wise, for 15 years).
In 2018, she made a comment in a Guardian interview that if she was American rather than Canadian, she would have voted for Trump:
"I would have voted for him because, even though he was offensive, he seemed honest. Do you want straight or polite? Not that you shouldn’t be able to have both. If I were voting, I just don’t want bullshit. I would have voted for a feeling that it was transparent. And politics has a reputation of not being that, right?"
But after she received backlash for the comment, she backtracked and apologized.
One interesting thing I noticed in that second article is that she was apparently sexually abused by her stepfather when she was growing up.
By the way, if you're interested in some fairly recent country music that's authentic and classic, I'd recommend checking out the Millwinders (a "rockabilly" band that played 1950-1960s-style rock and roll, country, and rhythm and blues music - they worked in a variety of styles). Sadly, the band split up around 2017 or 2018, but they have two great albums on Bandcamp.
Here's the music video for one of their country songs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lcuCGASaoo
Here's the Bandcamp page (which includes the ability to listen to the track for free) of my favorite country song by them:
https://millwinders.bandcamp.com/track/in-time-she-will
And here's the lead singer on most of their songs, Sarah Butler, performing a Patsy Cline cover with another band:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27R7HI4S54M
Here's another example of real country music from recent years from a band called The Delorean Sisters (the band are somewhat modern-looking, but their musical style is classic):
The way she dresses in basically drag
Do you mean the top hat and tuxedo outfit? If so, she wears that to perform her song "Man! I Feel like a Woman," and strips it off to reveal a feminine outfit underneath as the song goes on. It's a routine borrowed from old-time burlesque, and in her case is meant as a play on words of the song's title.
they also seem to look weirder as time goes on, and that was applying to her.
Some of that might be because she got messed up pretty badly from Lyme disease. Plus, like a lot of aging celebrities, she got plastic surgery as she got older.
Reasons listed above but she was also always a clear infiltrator on country music, even from the point it was already infiltrated in the 90s.
Yeah, I wouldn't really consider her to be a real country musician. More like pop with a slightly country twang. "Countrypolitan" music in the 1970s sort of paved the way for that sort of thing.
I was trying to see if Shania Twain was in there, but shockingly not. She should be. Money down on that bet.
What makes you think so? Everything about her has always looked extremely female to me (facial structure, body type, height, movements, etc).
And there are multiple photos of her pregnant.
I'm sorry it took me so long to respond, but I was away for the last few days.
And she was the first person in my awareness that took her own life after a traumatic event she went through.
She's been through a lot (she was raped, her brother was murdered, she had bouts of depression, was institutionalized 17 times, and tried to kill herself in 1984), but she survived, got through it, and is still alive at age 86.
What a special post. Thank you fren
You're welcome.
But as I said Marvel is heads and shoulders past DC with Agents of SHIELD being rather chock full of good stuff including a positive spirit and sense of hope that DC doesn't manage even when they deliberately try...
Marvel has gone downhill over the last few years, though. The first two MCU phases were overseen by Marvel CEO Ike Perlmutter, who is a friend, neighbor, and major financial supporter of Donald Trump. He was ousted from his position of control over the MCU in 2015 by Kevin Feige and Bob Iger, as he was an obstacle to their plans to insert their preferred leftist politics into the MCU. Not coincidentally, the MCU freefalled in terms of quality a couple of years later, then in profits a few years after that.
For a few years after being ousted from control over the movies in 2015, Perlmutter still had control over the television side of Marvel (including "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D."), but now has no control over any of Marvel.
Have you ever heard the Connie Francis song "God Save America"? It's about a second American Civil War, and the lyrics feel very timely.
It was recorded in 1970, but the recording was lost and never released. Decades later, a copy of the original tape recording was found. Music and sound effects were recorded for it, and it was finally released in 2019. It crackles in places because of damage to the surviving tape, but is a fascinating song.
Here's the song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5fePnVdm6s
Here's the story behind it:
https://www.facebook.com/100044438949402/posts/2117573428329195/
Never understood why he was so popular with conservatives.
Probably mostly because of his debates with woke college students. He was seen as an intellectual with a skill for "owning the libs".
Then he lost a lot of his cred when he became a never-Trumper.
He lost me earlier than that when I listened to a discussion between him and someone else where they were bashing Ron Paul with the dumbest justifications. For example, one of their criticisms of him was that he invests in gold.
I'd recommend reading this detailed breakdown of the occult symbolism associated with "Donda".
Have you looked into Ivermectin and Fenbendazole? Although they are anti-parasitic, they have shown potential in treating other issues. Ivermectin is useful against at least some virus (including the Coronavirus) and Fenbendazole has allegedly been successfully used in conjunction with zinc and other supplements to cure some cancers.
Mainstream country isn't, but there's still good independent country music being made. Here's a post I made with more details:
There's still real country music being made. You just have to look harder for it because it comes mostly from small-time independent musicians, not the mainstream.
One of the best places to find good new music is Bandcamp, which is a website where independent musicians can put their music for people to buy, usually with the option to listen to it for free first.
That's where I found bands like the Millwinders (a "rockabilly" band that played 1950-1960s-style rock and roll, country, and rhythm and blues music - they worked in a variety of styles). Sadly, the band split up around 2017 or 2018, but they have two great albums on Bandcamp.
Here's the music video for one of their country songs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lcuCGASaoo
Here's the Bandcamp page (which includes the ability to listen to the track for free) of my favorite country song by them:
https://millwinders.bandcamp.com/track/in-time-she-will
And here's their lead singer, Sarah Butler, performing a Patsy Cline cover with another band:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27R7HI4S54M
Here's another example of real country music from recent years from a band called The Delorean Sisters (the band are very modern-looking, but their musical style is classic):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXCLV0G_j_o
Also, here's a song by rockabilly band The Unkool Hillbillies that may amuse you (it's about how bad rap is):
Cabal do not have few years. Their days of reckoning can be counted in weeks at thus point.
If the 2020 election saga taught me anything, it's that it's next to impossible to predict the timing of these things, at least from the outside where we are.
Timing screams to me that this is a WH op for so many reasons.
I'm not so sure, but I hope you're right.
Seriously, if you have anything to prove that he has not rescued any children I would be the first to watch it.
The question is not whether he saved any children at all (which seems to be a recorded fact not in dispute). The question is whether he has actually devoted his life to saving many children (as he claims) and uses the money donated to him for that purpose to the best of his ability, or only has saved a few children (or pretended to in staged events) for appearances' sake and spends the vast majority of the donated money on things other than saving children.
Also to add, to be honest, SOF is not even as aggressive or comprehensive as I would have loved to see - but the funny thing is that it is really powerful for the normies who never even knew about the systemic pedophilia problem. I am sure it has paved the way for much more powerful and deeper movies/documentaries/disclosures that are to come.
What if it's a ploy by the Deep State, though? Here's a possible scenario that I can't stop considering ever since discovering the suspicious aspects of Tim Ballard:
Imagine that you're the Deep State and want to discredit Pizzagate and other such movements to expose large-scale and elite child trafficking. You find out that Tim Ballard is running a fraudulent operation, pretending to be rescuing large numbers of children when in fact he is saving few if any, and spending massive amounts of donated money on himself and his family.
He gets a movie made about himself to promote his organization and sells it to 20th Century Fox. You come up with a plan that involves this movie. But the timing isn't right yet. You want to release it at the right moment. You use Disney's buyout of Fox as a way to shelve the movie until the right time. You have Disney sit on the movie for years. You could have Disney keep it from ever being released if you wanted, but that's not your plan. Instead, you wait until the time is right, then let the filmmakers buy back the rights and get the movie distributed through Angel Studios.
When the movie releases, you have your people in the mainstream media attack the movie, associate it with Q and Pizzagate, etc, knowing full well that this will only make it more popular and make many people vociferously defend and support it. Through this method, you link the idea of mass child trafficking being a real thing and the movie together in the public mind. You cause the supporters of the movie to see its success as a major win, and to mentally and emotionally see any lack of belief in Ballard as a lack of belief that child trafficking is truly happening on a mass scale.
Then you wait a few more years, until the right moment for maximum psychological impact (perhaps right before evidence on some elite pedos is set to come out), and have Tim Ballard and possibly some of his associates arrested for crimes they are genuinely guilty of. You make a large public spectacle of the trial, and don't introduce any damning evidence until late in the game. You want Ballard's supporters to believe he is innocent and being railroaded for as long as you can. You want them to be very vocal about it for everyone to see.
Then you finally deliver the finishing blow: you introduce irrefutable evidence that Ballard is a fraud. He is convicted both in a court of law and the court of public opinion. Suddenly, everyone who ever supported him or his movie looks gullible to those on the outside, and the morale of those who did support Ballard and/or the movie is dealt a large blow. The "victory" they gained with "Sound of Freedom" becomes utterly pyrrhic. You bring out the mainstream media to loudly gloat "I told you so!" The entire movement to expose child trafficking to the public is set back decades.
But there IS a lot of evidence of Tim Ballard being, at the very least, a fraud. It looks much like the Eliza Bleu situation, but on a much larger scale.
I used to be a supporter of Operation Underground Railroad and promoted "Sound of Freedom" to everyone I could when it was coming out, but when I started actually looking into Tim Ballard, my intuition started ringing "alarm bells". There were so many warning signs and suspicious things, including his Clinton Administration connections, the fact that many of his stories contradict all available evidence of the events in question, and his connections to the upper echelons of the leadership of the Mormon church (which has been involved in human trafficking since its inception).
Then I discovered the investigative reporter Lynn Kenneth Packer (who exposed Paul H. Dunn as a fraud years ago). He made a series of videos on his YouTube channel alleging that Tim Ballard is a fraud who made up or embellished most of his stories, misused donated funds to make himself and his family rich, etc.
Now allegations are one thing - but Packer actually brings the receipts. He has shown some very damning evidence, including police reports that prove Ballard to have been lying on multiple occasions. Unlike the mainstream media, Packer is also fair - when he comes across an allegation about Ballard that doesn't have the evidence to back it up, he makes it clear that the claim is unfounded.
I would love it if Packer is wrong and Ballard is a genuine hero, but the preponderance of evidence points strongly in the other direction.
Here's Packer's YouTube channel:
Its the only movie to have ever featured adrenochrome. When it was mentioned, adrenachrome was 100% unknown to the public.
It was in the book years before that. In the book, Thompson claims to have taken adrenochrome and described the effects of it. For years, people noticed that the effects he described are exactly the same as the effects of DMT. Years later, Thompson said that it was actually DMT that he took, and that he made up the idea of it being adrenochrome and the idea that adrenochrome must be harvested from a living person in order to embellish the story.
Possibly. Either that, or a "reverse beard" situation.