1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

This, and even more importantly, they still have faith in their false god because he has gotten them this far and given them this much power already. Even when faced with seemingly sure defeat, they will still have faith in the hand of their false god. It's their only reasonable option at this point.

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course they do, and they'll be extremely angry to find out that God still owns it in the end and will do with them as He wishes.

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +2 / -0

They still do. They think they "sold" it, but it was never theirs to sell. God owns their soul and will ultimately decide their fate. They WISH they could have sold their soul to be owned by Satan instead.

6
SirCamembert 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thanks for noting this. We even reuse Greek letters because the amount of different variables in all of the different fields is vast. It’s not even a coincidence at all that Q is used as a variable multiple times for various fields of study, it’s an absolute inevitability. A-Z, Alpha-Omega, each and every single character, upper case and lower case, has multiple and different uses in every cryptic representation.

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your comment is actually the cop out on not acknowledging Q's statement that disinfo is necessary.

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Chill out with the accusations, seriously.

Did you forget disinfo is necessary? Has Q been right on every single person hes said anything about all of the time?

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

That doesn't sound convincing at all. A Mossad agent put a photo of them together in his book? That's it? Are we gonna damn Trump for his photoshoots with others now too?

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you know Q also said disinfo is necessary? I was talking about proof not other claims.

5
SirCamembert 5 points ago +12 / -7

A lot of people will state that AJ is Mossad as if its an undeniable and verifiable fact but every single time I've asked anyone claiming such for proof, they never give it, they just start saying that AJ never calls out Jews therefore he is Mossad.

So, are you gonna back up your claims?

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +3 / -1

That’s not true at all, I wouldn’t be able to do my my most basic daily tasks for work without specifically a smart phone where I can use maps and gps and search addresses using cellular data, while also being able to easily search businesses to call if needed

I would be without a job without a smart phone. Not even just a normal cell phone. There are so many remote work jobs that would not be possible without a smart phone.

0
SirCamembert 0 points ago +2 / -2

iPhone is hard because it’s Apples flagship and it is miles ahead in design sophistication compared to any other phone. They have the best engineers in the world implementing cutting edge technology continuously into the iPhone. It’s a marvel how innovative it has been and how much it has led the design of every other competitor. It would be such a shame to need to boycott such a fine product because their company has other interests in mind.

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s not what was said whatsoever...

Omnidirectional has shorter range than directional. The earth is round. Put it all together.

0
SirCamembert 0 points ago +1 / -1

Confused? You didn’t understand my point that you were responding to someone who was upset with the vagueness with even more vagueness in a belittling manner? Are you seriously pretending to be a victim right now?

And what do you mean by “I never replied”? Replied to deleted comments? What do you mean?

2
SirCamembert 2 points ago +3 / -1

I’m not interested in changing anyone’s mind anymore. They deserve hell. I’m interested in upholding justice despite what anyone else says.

My interests are no longer aligning with “the plan”.

0
SirCamembert 0 points ago +1 / -1

What the literal fuck are you going on about..? You must be absolutely insane to think all of that. You clearly have personal issues because you’re responding with absolute nonsense. You’re an embarrassment.

Why don’t you point to where an edit hurt you instead of crying about it and trying to convince yourself I made them after you replied (even though the logs prove I didn’t as literally anyone can check)? Do that or show me an edit that was made after your replied. You won’t.

Better make your next response worthwhile because I’m about to give up on you, especially since we’ve long since hit the end of the reply chain length.

0
SirCamembert 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yea so you can clearly see that each and every one of my edits were before any of your replies so that’s a stupid argument on your part. Every single time I have edited a comment of mine with you, you still hadn’t replied to it, so I’m not buying that bullshit. How would an edit ever hurt you anyway? Are you not confident in your argument? Maybe don’t spend your entire time on here and give some time for someone to reply if you’re trying to respond within seconds?

I don’t give a fuck what you think is excessive. I click send then proofread because it’s easier to not scroll through a tiny dialogue menu. Sometimes I’ll think to add more if I see you haven’t replied yet. I’ll continue to do it too. But you’ll cling to any stupid thing to argue against and deflect from the original argument.

You’re a seriously pathetic person. Still a waste of time. You’re just out to destroy a perceived enemy. Let’s see how much you attack me for editing this comment faggot.

1
SirCamembert 1 point ago +2 / -1

Went back and edited? Lol.. I’m guessing you went back to actually get what I was saying and realize how dumb you are now. I often add more right after posting. You just never caught the edits I assume. I don’t expect people to respond on here within minutes to not see my edits.

-2
SirCamembert -2 points ago +1 / -3

"Doctors don't have to be accredited" lol that's absurdly hilarious and you clearly have absolutely no idea what titles mean or why they were ever made.

You seriously think I'm living in a fantasy world because I'm able to acknowledge why the world uses titles and their meanings.

You're infantile and a waste of time.

https://www.reluctantgourmet.com/difference-cook-chef/#:~:text=Although%20there%20is%20no%20single,are%20typically%20considered%20a%20chef.

"Although there is no single professional organization that determines exactly who is a chef and who is a cook, most agree that the difference lies in education and experience.

If you have a culinary degree and/or trained under a notable chef and have moved up the ranks, you are typically considered a chef. If you simply dabble in the kitchen at home or are just starting out at the bottom of the restaurant totem pole, you are almost always considered a cook."

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›