1
Sneffels 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently you haven't been following along. This was not Stew's research that was brought to light.

1
Sneffels 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's not physical?! Why do people who don't know what the Bible has to say comment about things covered in the Bible?

Isaiah 14:16 talking about Lucifer: They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;

2
Sneffels 2 points ago +2 / -0

I reread the campaign and realized I addressed you as JB, who I see now is the one who started the campaign and that is not you.

I'm glad to see the KJV is one of the finalists. Obviously, it's your choice what you go with, but I would urge you to go with the King James for the reasons that follow. Sadly, I wasn't aware of all of the actual differences until not too many years ago between it and the new (age) versions, which includes the New King James. As I mentioned earlier, they aren't always subtle and often say completely different or opposite things. Then, I believe only the KJV doesn't have a copyright, which I think requires a 10% difference in content. $$$ When a copyright is in place as it relates to the Bible, you legally cannot copy a certain amount of text without providing a credit. Why then are publishers trying to take credit for God's word? When a publisher, like has been done with the NASB, has multiple releases, what are they actually doing it for? $$$

Now for just some example verses that don't say the same thing. I'm not sure if you've ever studied this aspect, but it is rather eye-opening if not. This really needs to be taught in our churches, but since they're virtually all 501c3s (another full important topic) and tied to the government and Baal at the hip, it's no wonder we find our country in the state it's in, though only a little while longer, all glory be to God.

Genesis 1:1: It usually only takes 5 words for newer versions, like the NASB, to start going in a different direction using heavens (plural), which is technically not correct. Might seem like small potatoes at first glance, but God did not separate the heavens until verse 6. KJV correctly uses the singular heaven.

Genesis 1:5: KJV says the first day, which is very concrete; all others say one day, which leaves room for the long periods of time argument when talking about how old the earth is. Quite problematic.

2 Samuel 21:19: KJV says Elhanan killed Goliath's brother, but the NASB says Elhanan killed Goliath. Wait, what?! I thought David killed Goliath. I thought everyone including those who don't think the Bible is real know that David killed Goliath. Different manuscripts.

Isaiah 14:12: KJV calls Lucifer son of the morning, yet the NASB and others refer to him as the morning star. Sounds Masonic to me.

Hosea 11:12 KJV indicates Judah rules with God, yet NASB says Judah is unruly against God. One cannot say that these say the same thing.

Ephesians 3:9: KJV says Jesus created all things from the very beginning, yet NASB and all the rest leaves out Jesus so not to offend and also omits the definite time point of the beginning.

Revelation 13:16: KJV says the mark will be in the right hand or foreheads; new versions say on. What do we know about how the current injections work and the patents and technology within? Undoubtedly, the real mark will be done in similar vein (pun intended!) when the time comes.

There are many other issues, like the number of times Jesus, hell, repent, and so forth are omitted in the new versions.

I was just about to hit the send button on a donation and was doing a bit more research. I don't see a church at that address, or at least a traditional church building. And actually, Google and Bing go to 2 different spots. Are you guys doing a home church, or what is the name of it, if I may?

2
Sneffels 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only thing I see there is reference to the New Testament Recovery Version, whatever that is. Stay away if that's all that offers. You can't have the fulfillment without the promise, or the sacrifice without the historical foundation, and so forth.

It would be a shame to only have half of the story without knowing or hearing the scientific truth of how the world came to be, along with fantastic stories of dinosaurs living with man, the rising and falling of kingdoms and people, and many supernatural events that many modern phrases and figures of speech reference, and all the rest. One needs the full meal deal for the instruction manual to this life and eternal life.

2
Sneffels 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's quite the story, JB, and a very admirable mission on many fronts. Blessings to you and your family, and I pray that your dad will come to know Jesus, the one true living God. I am willing to chip in a decent chunk, but am curious which version you plan to go with first. I have my preference and and hoping you are aware that not all versions are equal, and in many passages, say the opposite things.

6
Sneffels 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fantastic! Thanks for the link! That had a handful more than I had bookmarked.

1
Sneffels 1 point ago +1 / -0

A little graphic I just got done putting together for my LifeLog page update.

https://files.catbox.moe/i8kzz1.jpg

2
Sneffels 2 points ago +3 / -1

A very ignorant post, as is the case with most who say similar things about Lin. No evidence, just accusations. Lin has brought forward actual evidence against Sidney (not Sydney) and Mike. And with Mike, there are more than a few concerning items going against him. I used to be pro-Flynn, but have moved to the undecided camp. For starters, why don't you search out the phone call Lin recorded with him. You might learn a thing or two.

2
Sneffels 2 points ago +2 / -0

Someone else beat you to this, but yes, this was really pathetic by Hoft. I was glad to see him being called out in their comments section. They will run propaganda pieces every now and again, so always be on guard with them (and everyone else). This one was pretty blatant though.

3
Sneffels 3 points ago +3 / -0

TGP will definitely have some propaganda every now and again and Hoft had a real pathetic piece with this one. They still go with the lamestream narrative of 9/11 and ran another piece related to that yesterday. Definitely keep your eyes open with them and everyone else.

1
Sneffels 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair points now that you expounded a bit, and I certainly realize the need for cash and food. But gold is still very good. Similar to wheat and many other commodities, gold has gone up ~$200 in the last two weeks. One can buy a lot of wheat or bread with that margin alone. Not that this is any kind of time to be selling.

9
Sneffels 9 points ago +9 / -0

Gold and silver have been around since the very beginning. Genesis 2 and 13, respectively. They are God's intended money. They are not considered precious for nothing and they aren't going anywhere. I would advise being more careful with Rothschild debt notes.

3
Sneffels 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your deflection is palpable. Tell us, what is the name of god/God? The fact that secrecy is the name of the game for Masons tells us all we need to know.

For everyone else, this is a pretty rich and detailed 5-hour account of this horrid Luciferian order, covering their own documents, rituals, symbolism and the like: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yhv9ZMby68Ig/

4
Sneffels 4 points ago +7 / -3

A little projection here by Hendey. Freemasons are the largest church of Satan there is. It is a Luciferian sex order through and through with deception playing a big role, including to their own in the lower degrees. This guy provided the CNN version and sounds like he is a Mason. It would do him good to do a little research on their cute little club. Jesus and Freemasonry are not compatible. Lucifer/Satan is not god, and one does not have to ponder the name of the living God, and this guy even glossed right over it.

1
Sneffels 1 point ago +2 / -1

Clay has addressed these points many times, but because you and others don't actually listen to him and do further research as to how these images came to be, you come across as lazy. On the surface, they look horrible, but there is far more to the story.

8
Sneffels 8 points ago +8 / -0

Did you guys even process what you watched? This "whistleblower" was afraid they diluted the poison. She is fully complicit in administering these to kids to begin with, not to mention complicit in sheer willful ignorance with this and other vaccines in general.

view more: ‹ Prev