I think that his choice of Halloween costume could potentially indicate something about him, but that ultimately his fruits are what matter and are the most important indicator of what kind of person he is.
And I think that restoring free speech to Twitter is some extremely good fruit.
I also think that certain people will grasp at any straw they can to paint him as evil, regardless of what he does going forward. No nuance allowed; "he's bad cause 'x'".
100%.
Having kids sit in school for 8 hours a day for the vast majority of their time on this Earth before 18 isn't "education", it's a crime against humanity. And it only exists to make docile widget factory workers who are highly skilled at sitting in the factory all day and making widgets. Or more recently an office.
Almost all of the information outside of basic math and reading/writing is useless anyway. You're not meant to remember it, and I'd wager that most people forget most of it. What's really being taught is sitting still for extended periods of time and focusing on the tasks handed down to you by your superior.
In contrast, a real education would be going out and gaining experience in the world as well as a comparatively far smaller homeschooling program. Any kid that does that will turn out as a far better member of society than one who sat in even a good school all day for most of his life.
Depends.
Share prices go through the roof when you get that BlackRock money pumped in.
It says a lot that the anti-Trump talking points in other countries are asserting that an establishment clown would be better since they won't put their own country first, and will instead put the rest of the world first, which would of course be beneficial to these other countries.
Then they'll spend a 10-minute segment prattling on about how virtuous they are for fighting against climate change to save humanity, all the while pretending that they didn't just go from "who cares what happens to those stupid Americans?" to "you're a bad and uncompassionate person if you don't eat ze bugs!"
Nobody votes for the vice president, they vote for the president.
And the president-to-be consistently brings up abortion in the context of not banning it, and in the context of bringing it back to the states so the voters can decide instead of the federal government.
On top of this, most people don't consider abortion to be a major issue in America, by a lot. People are voting on immigration and the economy.
You're getting worked up over a non-issue. If Trump loses, it isn't because he said murdering kids is ok if you do it in the case of rape or incest, it's because the Dems fucking cheated again.
100%.
Deepstate goons would love to execute innocent people for "trafficking" their own children. Two birds, one stone. They get total control of your kids, and they get to kill you.
The hellish prison is in your mind, fren.
There's plenty of beauty to be found on God's green Earth, and God still thinks we are worth existing.
They sustain it because ignorance is bliss. I can't see any other possibility than that they truly don't see the delusions and contradictions that are innate to just about everything they believe.
Bad look.
Trump should do every debate Kameltoe is willing to do, and let her be the one to pick and choose where, when, and how she'll be transparent with the American people.
Show the middle ground types who for some reason still flip-flop between elections which candidate is the one who actually cares.
We need old-fashioned news because most people don't have faith in any of those things.
Too many people still just blindly believe whatever the establishment tells them. They either need to choose a new shepherd, or their current shepherd needs to be usurped and made to tell the truth.
And the latter is the easier of the two, I'd say, since if they could easily choose to follow the people telling the truth, they wouldn't be sheep in the first place.
Satan almost undoubtedly does not require his minions to always tell us the truth of what they are going to do. Satan lies like we breathe, and I see no reason to believe that their supposed requirement to tell us what they do is anything other than a lie itself.
And it'd be a great one. If we believe they have to tell us what they're going to do, they can easily misdirect us when we instantly believe whatever they tell us.
You know, I've never thought about it before, but "the Satanists have to tell the truth about their plans, this is their real plan right here they already told us all!" seems like the most nonsensical shit ever. What piece of evidence could possibly exist to suggest that this is true, outside of something that is itself highly suspect as a result of coming from someone who was at some point in the hive of untrustworthy Satanists?
This is the real news kek
Yes, dying changes nothing about a person's actions, which is why not speaking ill of the dead has nothing to do with what they did when they were alive.
It's awfully easy to make someone out to have been "an asshole or a POS in life" when they aren't there to defend themselves. And it serves no purpose, other than to make you feel better, since the value in talking about horrible people from the past is in understanding their actions and what they did. Calling them names doesn't inform anyone about the history of that person, it just makes them emotionally charged against someone they never knew, and makes you pissed off all over again because you keep resurfacing the same emotional reaction to some dead guy from decades ago.
You can say "John Smith did this and that" without also adding "and that's why John Smith was a massive asshole!".
Now, maybe John Smith was a massive asshole, and we just can't help but point it out sometimes, but that doesn't magically make it the right way to behave, or the right thing to say in a given scenario.
Does the illegality of murder belong to the states?
An unborn baby is either a person and killing him/her is murder, or an unborn baby isn't a person and can be killed up to birth. I suppose one could define personhood as "heartbeat", but that's contrived.
Wherever you define personhood, it's murder to kill a person born or unborn, and I don't see the value in allowing states to legalize murder.
rational middle ground
Doesn't exist.
There does exist a position that one must take to win currently, but it isn't rational.
Also, this whole take is weird considering that Trump constantly says he supports exceptions and that he ultimately is leaving it up to the states anyway, which have both basically become the de facto party platform. So what GOP are you talking about? It's not 2022 anymore kek
I'm the opposite, I guess. I could see 10 posts a day of Trump calling these people losers, among all the rest of the "Trumpiness", and I'd never get tired.
Nothing puts me in the mood to vote like a good Trump post.
No one created anything except God. Satan only twists things, and his followers do the same. Evil collapses in on itself continually; it can't build anything,
For a secular example, just take a look at Hollywood. They didn't make any of the shit they pump out. Instead, they bought up all the good franchises so they could destroy them with garbage adaptations. When they make an "original", it's still just a mishmash of ideas that worked before, and for them it's a total flop because they hate the ideas and twist them to be as perverted as they are.
The same is true of the left more generally. They create nothing, and instead only destroy or twist that which already was. They take over systems that already existed and use them against their purpose for control. They infiltrate groups that were already established and seek to impose their will until the original purpose is lost and all that's left is unrecognizable.
So no, evil couldn't create something like Christianity, only God could do that.
So justice is dead?
The musings of Man are naturally second to the word of God. If a Christian would put the former above the latter, I'd suggest that they don't truly value the word of God as highly as they say they do.
Basically, if God says free speech is bad, then free speech is bad. Luckily for us, however, God doesn't say this ;)
100% agreed on that, fren.
This is a good point, as it establishes that this isn't widespread among common people. What I'd argue, however, is that It doesn't need to be widespread for their plan to work, since their plan evidently seems to rely mostly on media, Hollywood, etc. to get white people to hate themselves out of existence.
This is also why it's not "divide and conquer" as the above post claimed. There's no fighting because many, if not most, white people agree whenever they are denigrated for their race. A ridiculously large number of white people aren't divided on race, but they're in agreement; in agreement that white people are inferior.
And what do you think would happen if any of the white dudes on the Bears' coaching staff took to X to start posting about anti-white racism? I'd wager half the other coaches would call him racist, and he'd ultimately be fired.
Ultimately, white people will breed themselves out of existence if they take no pride in their race, and continue to believe the anti-white drivel that the media peddles. It'll happen either through not having kids as a result of complete self-loathing, or as a result of mixed race couples turning all of the future generations some shade of brown.
And personally, I don't want any race to stop existing as distinct and unique groups, each with the own cultures and histories. The only way to achieve this is to reject both race hatred and excessive egalitarianism.
Sure, but if he wants to do business, which I'm sure he does, he does have to follow European law. This is the nature of the threat by the EU here. And aside from having X blocked, they could simply have him arrested for breaking their laws, which effectively bans him from going to any EU country.
Now, the thing is, they're a bunch of pussies who will almost certainly do nothing, lest they risk pissing off their social media addled citizens, so in this case Elon made the perfect choice. I guess I'm just a little autistic and felt like pointing this out.
Though I suppose it brings up an interesting question here on globalism. Obviously they want to be able to create their homogenous, global society, which is why they want to control companies like this, but then again, it's hardly globalism, because it's different countries with different rules, and it's the company that decides to venture into these different country's markets. So what is the alternative? Proper globalism would be One Law to Rule Them All, which is no good, but if a company could do business overseas with impunity that would certainly constitute a form of globalism, since it would mean that American companies could act with impunity worldwide while only being beholden to America, who has a vested interest in its companies being the best and most successful. So thinking about it, it would seem to me that what we have right now is as far from a globalist system as it could get, at least regarding the way companies operate overseas.
If it was a boring, uninteresting, rambling conversation then why did all these idiots feel the need to pump out hit pieces as quickly as they could?
Being proud of something doesn't mean destroying anything else. As an example, two people can each run a business and be very proud of theirs, without looking to destroy each other's. There's room for two, and the core behavior is the same no matter what you apply it to. Jealousy, envy, and/or fear are the things that could possibly lead someone to take action against another.
"Pride vs unity" is a false choice created by the people who want to kill whitey. It's not that they believe or don't believe in racial pride, it's simply that killing all whites is easier when you make everyone else proud of their race, and then stoke race hatred exclusively against white people. They are practical.
And I'm not going to bend over and pretend that the KKK or whatever bullshit from the past invalidates today's observable reality. I'm not going to pretend that being "ahead" of most minority groups (which is hardly the case anymore) means anything when the most influential minority group (tribe) in the country is the one most passionate about their utter disdain and hatred for white people, and the one with the most power over our society and culture to enact their wicked designs.
Would make sense to need more for a cancer protocol versus a covid/flu protocol.
That does seem like an awful lot more though, to be fair.